![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Problem is, when you are taxiing in front of one of those big blind
warbirds, how would you know if they have the camera? I'd rather just make my plane more visible to them and not trust them to see me by other means. And the idea of stopping the warbird if unsure of being in the clear, if all the areas the warbird pilot can see are clear, he'll keep going. Wing walkers are mostly for taxiing in the showgrounds, once on the taxiway, they are rarely used. Then it's up to the aircraft to see and aviod each other. Which obviously has serious flaws. On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:25:15 -0700, Mark Hickey wrote: "Dudley Henriques" wrote: "Jim Logajan" wrote in message ... Dudley Henriques made the same objection when I suggested the same idea on rec.aviation.piloting. The most significant problem with the objection is that no one is proposing that the pilot stare at the screen - simply add an occasional glance at the screen to the pilot's normal visual scan. Such a device should be no more objectional than the rearview mirrors in an automobile - devices that add more to safe driving than they detract. One more objection to the objection is :-) At first glance, you might think that what you are proposing is safe and workable, but it isn't in my opinion, and for several reasons. First of all, nothing, and I repeat NOTHING, can take the place of a basic eyeball scan OUTSIDE the cockpit when taxiing an aircraft in the WW2 tailwheel fighter category. The entire concept of ground safety when taxiing these airplanes is based on the simple premise that "if you can't clear or haven't cleared the path in front of the nose for the linear distance the airplane will travel before you can clear it again, YOU STOP THE AIRPLANE! This is a cardinal rule when taxiing these airplanes and for very good reason. snip I suspect you're picturing the pilot staring continually at the video screen while taxiing... that's not at all what I'd imagine. Obviously most of your visual input is going to come from direct observation "around the nose" of the aircraft - if someone's taxiing in from the right, you want to see them before they're directly in front of you. But if you're keeping your eyes open, there's no reason to suspect that something's going to just appear in front of your airplane unspotted - so there's no reason to spend a huge amount of time fixated on the "straight ahead video view" - you'd use that like you would a rear-view mirror. It sure beats stopping the airplane every time you lose track of what might be directly ahead of you, IMHO. Mark Hickey |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 54 | August 16th 05 10:24 PM |
| Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Owning | 44 | August 7th 05 03:31 PM |
| Disappointing Oshkosh 2004 Video on Wings | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 22 | September 28th 04 03:36 PM |
| Oshkosh EAA Warbirds ??? | Paul | Restoration | 0 | July 11th 04 05:17 AM |
| Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 10:25 AM |