![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I fly a small airplane (a Cessna 150) that is well maintained. I fly
over forests in good weather and typically during the day. My biggest fear is the engine quits over the forest and I have no place to make a deadstick landing except the tops of large trees. I drive a moderate motorcycle (a Honda Nighthawk 750) at moderate speeds through my small town and through the surrounding forests. My biggest fears are either that I will slide on a patch of dirt on the road and crash or someone will hit me with their car through inattention. I've been asked several times which of these things is more dangerous. Can anyone provide some statistics on this? -Thanks -Charles Talleyrand |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 Aug 2006 16:52:30 -0700, "Charles Talleyrand"
wrote: I fly a small airplane (a Cessna 150) that is well maintained. I fly over forests in good weather and typically during the day. My biggest fear is the engine quits over the forest and I have no place to make a deadstick landing except the tops of large trees. I drive a moderate motorcycle (a Honda Nighthawk 750) at moderate speeds through my small town and through the surrounding forests. My biggest fears are either that I will slide on a patch of dirt on the road and crash or someone will hit me with their car through inattention. I've been asked several times which of these things is more dangerous. Can anyone provide some statistics on this? -Thanks -Charles Talleyrand I don't have the URL, but I just recently read an article on this. I recall that it said that flying a plane, especially a small private one, definitely places you at greater risk of landing on the top of a large tree in the middle of a forest, and riding a motorcycle puts you in greater danger of sliding on dirt or getting in a car accident. HTH. -- Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!! http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/ Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me 'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.' 'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.' HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's Free demo now available online http://pmilligan.net/palm/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message ups.com... I fly a small airplane (a Cessna 150) that is well maintained. I fly over forests in good weather and typically during the day. My biggest fear is the engine quits over the forest and I have no place to make a deadstick landing except the tops of large trees. I drive a moderate motorcycle (a Honda Nighthawk 750) at moderate speeds through my small town and through the surrounding forests. My biggest fears are either that I will slide on a patch of dirt on the road and crash or someone will hit me with their car through inattention. I've been asked several times which of these things is more dangerous. Can anyone provide some statistics on this? -Thanks -Charles Talleyrand Sorry, I don't have any stats. But when I started a new job and applied for life insurance the form specifically asked if I flew in private airplanes, raced motorcycles and a variety of other "dangerous" activities. I think scuba diving was on the list also. The application did not ask about street riding a motorcycle. That tells me those activities will affect your life insurance premium. Therefore I deduce that flying is more dangerous than riding. Bryan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been asked several times which of these things is more dangerous.
Can anyone provide some statistics on this? You can get any answer you want, and it will be correct, depending on how you define "risk" and "danger" and "use" and such. Generally, flying an airplane and riding a motorcycle have some different purposes and some similar ones. That's the key. Let's say (for example) that you do both for pure entertainment, and the benefit is x hours of joy. Then you are interested in risk of {whatever} per hour. But if you do both purely for transportation, then the benefit is "getting there". The risk is per mile (since "there" doesn't move), but for flying, you need to add the risk of {whatever} during your trip to the airport. There are other reasons to engage in activities, and the key to getting the right answer is to ask the right question - to actually identify the issue in question. That is often harder than finding the answer. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I fly a small airplane (a Cessna 150.....
I drive a moderate motorcycle ...... I've been asked several times which of these things is more dangerous. Can anyone provide some statistics on this? -Thanks -Charles Talleyrand Sorry, I don't have any stats. But when I started a new job and applied for life insurance the form specifically asked if I flew in private airplanes..... The application did not ask about street riding a motorcycle. That tells me those activities will affect your life insurance premium. Therefore I deduce that flying is more dangerous than riding. Bryan Reasonable deduction. But way back in the late 1940s, when I began taking fly lessons, I was advised it would increase my life insurance premiums. Some time later, but still way back in the '40s, I was advised that the company would no longer increase the premium for pilots. My premium was not affected when I went to Navy flight training in 1949 or flew in the Marines for several years. Half a century has passed since then, and I have never again been asked if I fly, when taking out insurance. Don't know about bike riding, I'm not brave enough to try that. vince norris |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"Charles Talleyrand" wrote: [snip] I've been asked several times which of these things is more dangerous. Another way to approach the question/answer is to consider the residual risk after taking appropriate steps to mitigate the risk. The hazards associated with an engine failure in flight can be mitigated by several steps - flying a twin, or doing the best available maintenance, etc. etc. The hazards associated with taking a left turn on a bike can be mitigated as well - even going so far as to only take right turns. In the end, the most dangerous activity is the one with the most residual risk. Although it might take considerably more effort, you can make flying safer than other activities. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 Aug 2006 16:52:30 -0700, "Charles Talleyrand"
wrote: I fly a small airplane (a Cessna 150) that is well maintained. I fly over forests in good weather and typically during the day. My biggest fear is the engine quits over the forest and I have no place to make a deadstick landing except the tops of large trees. I drive a moderate motorcycle (a Honda Nighthawk 750) at moderate speeds through my small town and through the surrounding forests. My biggest fears are either that I will slide on a patch of dirt on the road and crash or someone will hit me with their car through inattention. I've been asked several times which of these things is more dangerous. Can anyone provide some statistics on this? Per mile, per hour, per year? What kind of gear do you wear? We know you do a BFR every other year; when was the last time you took the MSF experienced rider course? How old are you? Here's the NHTSA's "Recent Trends in Fatal Motorcycle Crashes: An Update," from June of this year: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd...006/810606.pdf And here's the 2005 Nall Report on General Aviation accidents.: http://www.aopa.org/asf/publications/05nall.pdf My guess is that personal factors even out and the risk for any one of us is about the same. And an awful lot of GA ;pilots are/have been bikers. I wish there were statistics on how many. Don |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another way to approach the question/answer is to consider the residual
risk after taking appropriate steps to mitigate the risk. The hazards associated with an engine failure in flight can be mitigated by several steps - flying a twin... Careful, mitigating one risk breeds another. Sometimes the new risk is easy to spot, sometimes not. But this is one of those things that makes statistics like this very difficult to make meaningful. Jos -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"vincent p. norris" wrote:
Half a century has passed since then, and I have never again been asked if I fly, when taking out insurance. Oh, they still ask. -- Peter |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
"vincent p. norris" wrote: Half a century has passed since then, and I have never again been asked if I fly, when taking out insurance. Oh, they still ask. I dread the day when insurance becomes compulsory. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Safety Concerns Ground 45 Air Force Academy Planes | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 15th 04 10:09 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |