![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Capt. Doug" wrote: Badwater Bill wrote in message The half snap on the back side of the loop was a good idea I wish I'd have thought of it. :-) The ailerons were ineffective even with the spoilers assisting. So I kicked hard rudder. At that slow airspeed, the rudder travel isn't limited. The swept wing snapped faster than Sister Mary Holysmoke can hit your knuckles with a ruler. Can you imagine making that recovery inverted? This is something I've pondered. During mach tuck, the shock waves cause the nose to pitch down despite the control inputs. If I went inverted during recovery, wouldn't the inverted nose pitch up? Then the plane would decelerate, the shockwaves would dissipate, and control would be regained. D. Sounds like it might work. If the wings stay on... (negative G limits?) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Optimal Frequency of Lessons | David B. Cole | Aerobatics | 18 | October 28th 04 01:50 AM |
| Calculating vertical time and distance in a stall turn (US Hammerhead) | Dave | Aerobatics | 3 | November 20th 03 11:48 AM |
| Oshkosh 2003 Redux | Sydney Hoeltzli | Home Built | 97 | August 14th 03 05:29 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 05:50 PM |