A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

B-58's targets in a nuclear war



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd 06, 12:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
Diamond Jim
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default B-58's targets in a nuclear war


"Dan" wrote in message
...
Diamond Jim wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Diamond Jim wrote:
"Robert" wrote in message
...
"Diamond Jim" wrote in message
m...


SNIP! SNIP!SNIP!


I'd like cites for your information. - - - - - -


I am not a damn librarian, look it up, this stuff is public knowledge,
learn to do your own searches,


snip a bunch of rude stuff.

That was uncalled for.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Thank you. Your opinion is noted and will be ignored.

I think that reply was called for. First it is easy to get the information,
its public knowledge, and the information is widely available. All he had to
do was type "Nike missiles in Okinawa" or "US nuclear weapons in Japan" into
a search engine and hit the return key.

Besides from reading his uninformed opinion, it was obvious he didn't have
the slighest clue about the subject. If he had bothered to do any resurch on
the subject he would have quickly found out he was misinformed. If someone
can't help themselves then why should I waste my time tying to help them.

BTY why should I waste my time arguing with you. The first sentence of this
reply sums everything up nicely.


  #2  
Old December 3rd 06, 03:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
Dan[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 465
Default B-58's targets in a nuclear war

Diamond Jim wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Diamond Jim wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Diamond Jim wrote:
"Robert" wrote in message
...
"Diamond Jim" wrote in message
m...
SNIP! SNIP!SNIP!


I'd like cites for your information. - - - - - -
I am not a damn librarian, look it up, this stuff is public knowledge,
learn to do your own searches,

snip a bunch of rude stuff.

That was uncalled for.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Thank you. Your opinion is noted and will be ignored.

I think that reply was called for. First it is easy to get the information,
its public knowledge, and the information is widely available. All he had to
do was type "Nike missiles in Okinawa" or "US nuclear weapons in Japan" into
a search engine and hit the return key.

Besides from reading his uninformed opinion, it was obvious he didn't have
the slighest clue about the subject. If he had bothered to do any resurch on
the subject he would have quickly found out he was misinformed. If someone
can't help themselves then why should I waste my time tying to help them.

BTY why should I waste my time arguing with you. The first sentence of this
reply sums everything up nicely.


Would it hurt you to be civil about it?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #3  
Old December 3rd 06, 03:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
Diamond Jim
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default B-58's targets in a nuclear war


"Dan" wrote in message
...
Diamond Jim wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Diamond Jim wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Diamond Jim wrote:
"Robert" wrote in message
...
"Diamond Jim" wrote in message
m...
SNIP! SNIP!SNIP!


I'd like cites for your information. - - - - - -
I am not a damn librarian, look it up, this stuff is public knowledge,
learn to do your own searches,
snip a bunch of rude stuff.

That was uncalled for.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Thank you. Your opinion is noted and will be ignored.

I think that reply was called for. First it is easy to get the
information, its public knowledge, and the information is widely
available. All he had to do was type "Nike missiles in Okinawa" or "US
nuclear weapons in Japan" into a search engine and hit the return key.

Besides from reading his uninformed opinion, it was obvious he didn't
have the slighest clue about the subject. If he had bothered to do any
resurch on the subject he would have quickly found out he was
misinformed. If someone can't help themselves then why should I waste my
time tying to help them.

BTY why should I waste my time arguing with you. The first sentence of
this reply sums everything up nicely.


Would it hurt you to be civil about it?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Your opinion is noted and will be ignored. (again)




  #4  
Old December 4th 06, 12:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
Dean A. Markley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39
Default B-58's targets in a nuclear war

Diamond Jim wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Diamond Jim wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Diamond Jim wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Diamond Jim wrote:
"Robert" wrote in message
...
"Diamond Jim" wrote in message
m...
SNIP! SNIP!SNIP!


I'd like cites for your information. - - - - - -
I am not a damn librarian, look it up, this stuff is public knowledge,
learn to do your own searches,
snip a bunch of rude stuff.

That was uncalled for.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Thank you. Your opinion is noted and will be ignored.

I think that reply was called for. First it is easy to get the
information, its public knowledge, and the information is widely
available. All he had to do was type "Nike missiles in Okinawa" or "US
nuclear weapons in Japan" into a search engine and hit the return key.

Besides from reading his uninformed opinion, it was obvious he didn't
have the slighest clue about the subject. If he had bothered to do any
resurch on the subject he would have quickly found out he was
misinformed. If someone can't help themselves then why should I waste my
time tying to help them.

BTY why should I waste my time arguing with you. The first sentence of
this reply sums everything up nicely.


Would it hurt you to be civil about it?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Your opinion is noted and will be ignored. (again)




I must agree with Dan. Would it hurt you to be civil? At the very
least it will keep you from being seen as a narrow-minded, nasty,
know-it-all.

Oh and your note is noted and ignored.

Dean
  #5  
Old December 4th 06, 04:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
Steve Hix
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 340
Default B-58's targets in a nuclear war

In article ,
"Diamond Jim" wrote:


Would it hurt you to be civil about it?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Your opinion is noted and will be ignored. (again)


A simple "no" would suffice.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
N. Korea's Nuclear Weapon Test, Possible 'dud', 1 Kiloton or less ? AirRaid Naval Aviation 0 October 9th 06 11:15 PM
Iran's nuclear program Thelasian Military Aviation 107 August 31st 04 07:35 AM
What is missile defense? An expensive fraud Bush needs Poland as a future nuclear battlefield Paul J. Adam Military Aviation 1 August 9th 04 09:29 PM
Czechoslovak nuclear weapons? Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) Matt Wiser Military Aviation 25 January 17th 04 03:18 PM
Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) Matt Wiser Military Aviation 0 December 7th 03 09:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.