![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "FLAV8R" wrote in message ... That would depend on what has the greater resistance, the air in front of the plane or the belt on the treadmill. No, it would not depend on that at all. Both of those effects are creating a resistance in the same direction, and thus are additive. Which one is greater is irrelevant. The only relevant question is whether they combined exceed the thrust from the engines. They don't even come close to doing that, and so the engines can easily push the airplane forward to a high enough speed for flight. [...] You can equate it to an airboat in a river. Will the river push the airboat down stream or will the propulsion of the engine move it forward? It's similar, yes. Except that the drag due to friction from the treadmill is miniscule, whereas hydrodynamic drag is significant. Pete As pictured, the runway is much to short, which is just as well since the uprights of the treadmill would impinge on the wings. bfg Actually, I agree that the drag from the treadmill is trivial. Therefore, if sufficient distance was provided to accellerate to an appropriate airspeed, the only problem would be the maximum speed rating of the tires. Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ray" wrote in message ... Looks like airplane treadmill problem, regularly a spark for flame wars on R.A.P., has made it into the mainstream. http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/ Let the arguing begin! - Ray It is a trick question. The obvious assumption being that the plane will not move, therefore no airflow over the wings. The plane, however WILL move down the runway. The propeller or the jets will pull or push on the air and move the plane. The wheels are not providing the moving force, the reaction of the thrust mechanism against the air is. One of two things would happen before the plane took off though, the bearings in the planes wheels would burn up or the motor driving the treadmill would burn up. The control system is in an infinite feedback loop. The plane would move due to the forces described above and the treadmill would try to speed up, so the wheels would move faster, then the treadmill would move faster etc etc etc...... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ray" wrote in message ... Looks like airplane treadmill problem, regularly a spark for flame wars on R.A.P., has made it into the mainstream. http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/ Let the arguing begin! It is truly amazing how many clueless people have commented on the problem. MX should go hang out there. He would look like a rocket scientist. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ray" wrote in message ... Looks like airplane treadmill problem, regularly a spark for flame wars on R.A.P., has made it into the mainstream. http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/ Let the arguing begin! - Ray This looks like a job for the MythBusters!!! -------------------------------------- DW |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Darkwing" theducksmailATyahoo.com wrote in message
... This looks like a job for the MythBusters!!! *Yawn* That would be a boring show. Either they'd have to fill 19 minutes with the construction of the treadmill itself, or they'd have the airplane taking off in the first 30 seconds, leaving them with 19 minutes of filler at the end. You don't need MythBusters. You just need a little knowledge of physics and some common sense. Pete |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Darkwing" theducksmailATyahoo.com wrote in message ... This looks like a job for the MythBusters!!! *Yawn* That would be a boring show. Either they'd have to fill 19 minutes with the construction of the treadmill itself, or they'd have the airplane taking off in the first 30 seconds, leaving them with 19 minutes of filler at the end. You don't need MythBusters. You just need a little knowledge of physics and some common sense. Pete Okay Mr. Cynical, I sent an email off to the Mythbusters explaining this whole thing and a link to the Google Groups thread so we'll see if they pick it up and show it on the program. --------------------------- DW |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote: Okay Mr. Cynical, I sent an email off to the Mythbusters explaining this whole thing and a link to the Google Groups thread so we'll see if they pick it up and show it on the program. doubt it. It's not a myth. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/
If we take the statement, "The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels, moving in the opposite direction", to mean that the plane can not move forward, because some how the conveyor is moving so fast the wheel friction becomes great enough that the engine thrust can not over come it. Obviously this isn't going to happen, but if it were, I think we can all agree that the conveyor would be moving extremely fast, several hundred MPH if not thousands of MPH. Now consider a 150 foot wide, 10,000 foot long conveyor moving at that speed. Would that not cause enough air to move with it that there would be enough air speed for the plane to lift off? Of course once that happened, the wheels would quickly stop, as would the conveyor and the air. Then with no forward ground speed, the plane would probably fall because it could not accelerate as fast as the "head wind" was dying. How's that for an interesting twist? -- Chris W KE5GIX "Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm" Gift Giving Made Easy Get the gifts you want & give the gifts they want One stop wish list for any gift, from anywhere, for any occasion! http://thewishzone.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ray" wrote in message ... Looks like airplane treadmill problem, regularly a spark for flame wars on R.A.P., has made it into the mainstream. http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/ Let the arguing begin! - Ray You're standing on the conveyor wearing a pair of roller skates. The rope you are holding is attached to the rear bumper of a truck. The truck is on the ground and begins to move away from you. As you begin to move forward the conveyor begins to turn backwards to match the wheel's speed. (Here's another point... as long as the wheels are rolling and not sliding the conveyor is "matching the wheel's speed". Just depends on the observer's reference frame whether the conveyor is moving or even needs to move to meet the conditions of the problem.) Eventually the truck will pull you off the end of the conveyor. Just substitute a propeller coupled to the atmosphere for the truck's wheels coupled to the ground. The conveyor is irrelevant. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, how about this one. Everyone knows pilots love a tailwind.
You have a giant fan mounted on a truck positioned behind the airplane. The fan blows air towards the airplane, helping it to accelerate down the runway (literally blowing it down the runway) while the truck follows, keeping up with the airplane. Pretty soon the plane will be thundering down the runway and the pilot pulls back on the yoke. Does the pilot have to wait until the airplane's speed down the runway is twice Vr before he can take off? Jose -- "There are 3 secrets to the perfect landing. Unfortunately, nobody knows what they are." - (mike). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | April 1st 04 08:27 AM |