![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Travis Marlatte wrote:
"Ron Lee" wrote in message ... Actually the DOPs are related to satellite geometry and are unitless. It is only when you multiply the DOP by the signal/user equipment error that you get some sort of error in feet/meters. The DOPs represent a statistical confidence. They do have a unit but you're right, it's not in units of distance and it is not standardized. No, Ron is correct that the various DOPs (PDOP, VDOP, HDOP, TDOP, etc.) are unit-less measures based on the satellite geometry. They are well-defined and standardized as specified in Section 3.1.3 of the Navstar User Equipment guide: http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf It's when the DOP, typically the HDOP, is translated into a corresponding EPE (Estimated Position Error) or accuracy value that it is converted into a measure with units of distance and these measures are not standardized across manufacturers or even sometimes between models of a given manufacturer. I agree with some previous comments that the VDOP is generally somewhat larger than HDOP due to the inherent geometry of the situation. You usually have satellites on all sides of your position, but you can only get signals from satellites above you, none below, and that reduces the accuracy of the altitude calculation. An additional consideration in the OP's case is that when the unit first gets enough satellite signals to report a position it may only have enough for a '2D' calculation. With three satellite signals, the unit can only determine the exact time and two space coordinates, so it assumes the altitude based on the last value previously seen and only calculates the lat. and long. coordinates. Then when it gets one or more additional satellite signals it can switch to '3D' mode and calculate the actual altitude as well. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"peter" wrote in message
oups.com... Travis Marlatte wrote: "Ron Lee" wrote in message ... Actually the DOPs are related to satellite geometry and are unitless. It is only when you multiply the DOP by the signal/user equipment error that you get some sort of error in feet/meters. The DOPs represent a statistical confidence. They do have a unit but you're right, it's not in units of distance and it is not standardized. No, Ron is correct that the various DOPs (PDOP, VDOP, HDOP, TDOP, etc.) are unit-less measures based on the satellite geometry. They are well-defined and standardized as specified in Section 3.1.3 of the Navstar User Equipment guide: http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf I agree. I overstated my point which was only that the DOPs did not represent something as simple as an error radius around the true position. ------------------------------- Travis Lake N3094P PWK |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| For Sale: 1-34 horizontal stab/elevator | Mitch Deutsch | Soaring | 0 | November 12th 06 04:46 PM |
| Why are (some) delta wings stable without a horizontal tail? | xerj | Piloting | 13 | April 11th 06 03:38 AM |
| Horizontal Stab. rusted on stubs | Michael Horowitz | Restoration | 5 | April 8th 06 04:50 PM |
| WTB: 1-34 Horizontal Stabilizer | Jeremy Zawodny | Soaring | 1 | October 15th 04 06:12 AM |
| FA: Vaccum DG Horizontal (Mooney) | KC | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | December 29th 03 06:29 PM |