A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Silent Flight: PV Powered Blimps



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 14th 07, 04:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Stubby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 117
Default Silent Flight: PV Powered Blimps

Jim Logajan wrote:
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
The solar cells to power it would consume a lot of its payload.


In the text "Airship Technology" Edited by Khoury and Gillett, Chapter 16,
"Solar Power" deals with design issues of solar powered airship proposals.

Using thin-film PV arrays and brushless DC motors, it states that:
"Potentially, the solar power system could weigh less than 10% of the gross
lift of the 22 tonne airship and would then be competitive in weight with
the conventional airship."


And if something other than silicon solar cells are used, the efficiency
can be much high. In 1981 I heard a talk by one John Fan who was
launching a company to make galium arsinide cells. I believe he could
get 10% conversion efficiency rather than 1 to 2% for Si .
  #2  
Old January 14th 07, 05:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Don Tuite
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 319
Default Silent Flight: PV Powered Blimps

On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:10:25 -0500, Stubby
wrote:

Jim Logajan wrote:
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
The solar cells to power it would consume a lot of its payload.


In the text "Airship Technology" Edited by Khoury and Gillett, Chapter 16,
"Solar Power" deals with design issues of solar powered airship proposals.

Using thin-film PV arrays and brushless DC motors, it states that:
"Potentially, the solar power system could weigh less than 10% of the gross
lift of the 22 tonne airship and would then be competitive in weight with
the conventional airship."


And if something other than silicon solar cells are used, the efficiency
can be much high. In 1981 I heard a talk by one John Fan who was
launching a company to make galium arsinide cells. I believe he could
get 10% conversion efficiency rather than 1 to 2% for Si .


We're up to about 18% for 3-bandgap Si, although SunPower's getting
21% with special wafers that have a long enough minority-carrier
lifetime to allow the collection grid to be placed on the backside of
the wafer. Amorphous panels produced using a web-printing process
seem to be getting around 15%, enough for one of the oil companies to
be using them to power one of their oilfields on the patch down by
Bakersfield.

Don
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 03:26 PM
flying low...military video gatt Piloting 60 January 8th 07 02:43 AM
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft Mike Rotorcraft 3 September 27th 06 05:44 PM
NTSB: USAF included? Larry Dighera Piloting 10 September 11th 05 11:33 AM
Solar Powered Round The World Flight Planned For 2009 Larry Dighera Soaring 7 March 14th 05 08:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.