747-400 questions

Hi Mxmanic,

You appear to miss the whole point sometimes, mate!!

Rather than standby and let you aggravate a bloke like Downloader (not
to mention many other folk here, who I also value greatly), which is deeply
offensive to me, and many other people here, how about opening up a thread
with just you and me, mate, on anything at all that tickles your fancy??

That way, whatever the outcome may be, nobody else here will be
responding to any of your posts, because it would also be a condition that
you and I both post nowhere else for the duration of the thread, mate.

What do you say - have you got the balls?

If you haven't, I would urge everyone here to simply not reply to any of
your posts, ever, so that, eventually, you would feel as though there was
something wrong with you, wouldn't you, as any normal person would?

What do you say, mate - yes or no? Quite simple.

Anything other than a simple yes or no from you should be a signal to
everyone else, and myself, to simply ignore your posts completely in the
future.

Can't be fairer than that, mate.

Regards,
John Ward

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
boB writes:

Do you know how arrogant that is????

There's nothing arrogant about it. A post filled with personal attacks
and
nothing else does not address the topic of the thread, nor does it answer
the
questions that I originally posted. Therefore it is of no use to me.

Why should anyone help you at all???

Because he knows the answers?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

John Ward wrote:

Hi Mxmanic,

You appear to miss the whole point sometimes, mate!!

Rather than standby and let you aggravate a bloke like Downloader
(not to mention many other folk here, who I also value greatly),
which is deeply offensive to me, and many other people here, how
about opening up a thread with just you and me, mate, on anything at
all that tickles your fancy??

That way, whatever the outcome may be, nobody else here will be
responding to any of your posts, because it would also be a condition
that you and I both post nowhere else for the duration of the thread,
mate.

What do you say - have you got the balls?

If you haven't, I would urge everyone here to simply not reply to
any of your posts, ever, so that, eventually, you would feel as
though there was something wrong with you, wouldn't you, as any
normal person would?

What do you say, mate - yes or no? Quite simple.

Anything other than a simple yes or no from you should be a signal
to everyone else, and myself, to simply ignore your posts completely
in the future.

Can't be fairer than that, mate.

Regards,
John Ward

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
boB writes:

Do you know how arrogant that is????

There's nothing arrogant about it. A post filled with personal
attacks and nothing else does not address the topic of the thread,
nor does it answer the questions that I originally posted.
Therefore it is of no use to me.

Why should anyone help you at all???

Because he knows the answers?

-- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Doesn't bother me anymore JW! This new newsreader I'm using has a 'Bozo
Author" button, which I can set to not even download messages from
anyone I deem to be a Bozo! Guess who's on the list!

--
Crash Lander.
I'm not always right,
But I'm never wrong.

Me?

JW
"Crash Lander" wrote in message
...
John Ward wrote:

Hi Mxmanic,

You appear to miss the whole point sometimes, mate!!

Rather than standby and let you aggravate a bloke like Downloader
(not to mention many other folk here, who I also value greatly),
which is deeply offensive to me, and many other people here, how
about opening up a thread with just you and me, mate, on anything at
all that tickles your fancy??

That way, whatever the outcome may be, nobody else here will be
responding to any of your posts, because it would also be a condition
that you and I both post nowhere else for the duration of the thread,
mate.

What do you say - have you got the balls?

If you haven't, I would urge everyone here to simply not reply to
any of your posts, ever, so that, eventually, you would feel as
though there was something wrong with you, wouldn't you, as any
normal person would?

What do you say, mate - yes or no? Quite simple.

Anything other than a simple yes or no from you should be a signal
to everyone else, and myself, to simply ignore your posts completely
in the future.

Can't be fairer than that, mate.

Regards,
John Ward

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
boB writes:

Do you know how arrogant that is????

There's nothing arrogant about it. A post filled with personal
attacks and nothing else does not address the topic of the thread,
nor does it answer the questions that I originally posted.
Therefore it is of no use to me.

Why should anyone help you at all???

Because he knows the answers?

-- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Doesn't bother me anymore JW! This new newsreader I'm using has a 'Bozo
Author" button, which I can set to not even download messages from
anyone I deem to be a Bozo! Guess who's on the list!

--
Crash Lander.
I'm not always right,
But I'm never wrong.

Hi Crash Lander,

Never bothered me either, mate, personally - just a part of life's rich
tapestry, but I could tell that it bothered others.

Regards,
John Ward


"Crash Lander" wrote in message
...
John Ward wrote:

Hi Mxmanic,

You appear to miss the whole point sometimes, mate!!

Rather than standby and let you aggravate a bloke like Downloader
(not to mention many other folk here, who I also value greatly),
which is deeply offensive to me, and many other people here, how
about opening up a thread with just you and me, mate, on anything at
all that tickles your fancy??

That way, whatever the outcome may be, nobody else here will be
responding to any of your posts, because it would also be a condition
that you and I both post nowhere else for the duration of the thread,
mate.

What do you say - have you got the balls?

If you haven't, I would urge everyone here to simply not reply to
any of your posts, ever, so that, eventually, you would feel as
though there was something wrong with you, wouldn't you, as any
normal person would?

What do you say, mate - yes or no? Quite simple.

Anything other than a simple yes or no from you should be a signal
to everyone else, and myself, to simply ignore your posts completely
in the future.

Can't be fairer than that, mate.

Regards,
John Ward

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
boB writes:

Do you know how arrogant that is????

There's nothing arrogant about it. A post filled with personal
attacks and nothing else does not address the topic of the thread,
nor does it answer the questions that I originally posted.
Therefore it is of no use to me.

Why should anyone help you at all???

Because he knows the answers?

-- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Doesn't bother me anymore JW! This new newsreader I'm using has a 'Bozo
Author" button, which I can set to not even download messages from
anyone I deem to be a Bozo! Guess who's on the list!

--
Crash Lander.
I'm not always right,
But I'm never wrong.

John Ward writes:

Rather than standby and let you aggravate a bloke like Downloader (not
to mention many other folk here, who I also value greatly), which is deeply
offensive to me, and many other people here, how about opening up a thread
with just you and me, mate, on anything at all that tickles your fancy??

Do you know the answers to my 747-400 questions?

I think I may have found the answer to one of them. Apparently I'm supposed
to start one and two after closing the isolation valve to the opposite side of
the aircraft. Then, once they are running, I can open the value and use the
air to start three and four. I suppose the alarm has something to do with not
having enough bleed air or something (although I showed 35 psi, I think). The
documentation doesn't specifically address it, though.

That way, whatever the outcome may be, nobody else here will be
responding to any of your posts, because it would also be a condition that
you and I both post nowhere else for the duration of the thread, mate.

I'm not interested in censorship, sorry.

If you haven't, I would urge everyone here to simply not reply to any of
your posts, ever, so that, eventually, you would feel as though there was
something wrong with you, wouldn't you, as any normal person would?

There are thousands of people on this newsgroup. I doubt that all of them are
going to remain silent on your command alone.

Anything other than a simple yes or no from you should be a signal to
everyone else, and myself, to simply ignore your posts completely in the
future.

If you can't answer my questions, there's no loss in that.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

That doesn't sound like a simple Yes/No Answer, to me, mate.

JW

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
John Ward writes:

Rather than standby and let you aggravate a bloke like Downloader (not
to mention many other folk here, who I also value greatly), which is
deeply
offensive to me, and many other people here, how about opening up a
thread
with just you and me, mate, on anything at all that tickles your fancy??

Do you know the answers to my 747-400 questions?

I think I may have found the answer to one of them. Apparently I'm
supposed
to start one and two after closing the isolation valve to the opposite
side of
the aircraft. Then, once they are running, I can open the value and use
the
air to start three and four. I suppose the alarm has something to do with
not
having enough bleed air or something (although I showed 35 psi, I think).
The
documentation doesn't specifically address it, though.

That way, whatever the outcome may be, nobody else here will be
responding to any of your posts, because it would also be a condition
that
you and I both post nowhere else for the duration of the thread, mate.

I'm not interested in censorship, sorry.

If you haven't, I would urge everyone here to simply not reply to any of
your posts, ever, so that, eventually, you would feel as though there was
something wrong with you, wouldn't you, as any normal person would?

There are thousands of people on this newsgroup. I doubt that all of them
are
going to remain silent on your command alone.

Anything other than a simple yes or no from you should be a signal to
everyone else, and myself, to simply ignore your posts completely in the
future.

If you can't answer my questions, there's no loss in that.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Ahhhhh.... In other words..

You don't know the answer(s) to Mx's questions...



Dave





On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:05:59 GMT, "Not4wood"
wrote:

Again, I'll have to explain things to MXS:

Side note: Way too many of the members of this great Usenet group agmfs
have put you in there kill files and wont see this. I am crossposting this
for the benefit of the RL Pilots who we have heard that you have ****ed off
as well. I never intentionally cross post until now where I feel I have to
inform the RL counterpart to this group about the latest events..

You've calm down lately and that is a good thing. Sorry to have to tell you
this but you have annoyed way too many people with your arrogant quotes and
self righteous attitude. Believing yourself to be an expert and tell people
that you know something when you dont is arrogant. When you dont do
something in RL and then become an expert because you see it printed by
somebody else and take credit for it. Now, thats arrogant. When, this
group starts to hear your ****ing people off in the RL Pilots Group because
you feel a need to try to be on there level of knowledge, skill and
experience. By arguing with them the things you've picked up in here and
making the mistake that this is real life and then going back to them and
arguing the point. Thats NOT arrogant. Thats just plain stupid. The Real
Life Pilots who fly RL planes see that you do nothing, learn nothing and
experience nothing but feel you have to tell them who are the real
experienced people in the skies what they should know and do. That is
ARROGANT!

First, there are plenty of 747 Virtual Pilots here and good ones to I might
add. The problem is you have ****ed off too many of them and NO ONE wants
to help you. Get it, you've come to that point in time that now of all
things you need this group to help you after you ****ed off just about
everyone.

Now do you understand? Some of us have warned you including me. Now the
truth hurts, but you will probably rationalize your grave mistake so you
wont fully understand the implications of what you've done. Good luck to
you, where ever you go.

Pushes his chair back, and stands. Waits for a second and then bows. Now
turns and walks off into the Sunset to get his first cup of Jo this morning.

Not4wood




"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
.. .
BT writes:

That's how it is in real airplanes.

Good; I like realism. But is there any technique to finding the right
throttle setting? The 747 seems particularly prone to this (as compared
to a
737).

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

"Not4wood" wrote:

First, there are plenty of 747 Virtual Pilots here and good ones to I might
add. The problem is you have ****ed off too many of them and NO ONE wants
to help you. Get it, you've come to that point in time that now of all
things you need this group to help you after you ****ed off just about
everyone.

Well said!
I happen to care enough about this hobby (and the PMDG products I fly)
that I went
out and purchased and downloaded all the necessary manuals to help me
fly these
machines. I even bought the real FMC manual for the big Boeings.
So I know how to solve his problem.

But...I ain't gonna. Not this time.
He always knows better any way. He always has advice, which is the
exact same
advice and answer somone else conviently posted a minute sonner than
him, and
he presumes to know everything like he's flown and done everything
IRL.

Nope. This is the first time I'm declining to help someone here and
I'm not
feeling the least bit bad about myself!


Marcel

Marcel Kuijper writes:

Well said!
I happen to care enough about this hobby (and the PMDG products I fly)
that I went
out and purchased and downloaded all the necessary manuals to help me
fly these
machines. I even bought the real FMC manual for the big Boeings.
So I know how to solve his problem.

No, you don't.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Hi Studmuffin,

Well said yourself, mate!

Regards,
John Ward
"Marcel Kuijper" wrote in message
oups.com...
"Not4wood" wrote:

First, there are plenty of 747 Virtual Pilots here and good ones to I
might
add. The problem is you have ****ed off too many of them and NO ONE
wants
to help you. Get it, you've come to that point in time that now of all
things you need this group to help you after you ****ed off just about
everyone.

Well said!
I happen to care enough about this hobby (and the PMDG products I fly)
that I went
out and purchased and downloaded all the necessary manuals to help me
fly these
machines. I even bought the real FMC manual for the big Boeings.
So I know how to solve his problem.

But...I ain't gonna. Not this time.
He always knows better any way. He always has advice, which is the
exact same
advice and answer somone else conviently posted a minute sonner than
him, and
he presumes to know everything like he's flown and done everything
IRL.

Nope. This is the first time I'm declining to help someone here and
I'm not
feeling the least bit bad about myself!


Marcel