![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John A. Stovall wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:23:53 +0300, transputer wrote: WASHINGTON - The Pentagon (news - web sites) is setting up a stock-market style system in which investors would bet on terror attacks, assassinations and other events in the Middle East. Defense officials hope to gain intelligence and useful predictions while investors who guessed right would win profits. Interesting idea which looks like an expansion of what are called Delphi forecasting techniques. I would like to see how it works. Actually, it's the opposite. Delphi is about questioning large numbers of people who DON'T have a specific knowledge of the situation. It turns out that if you ask 1000 people (WHO DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER) how many people died of Spanish Influenza, or how many loaves of rye bread were discarded as spoiled in Germany in 1996 (No @#$%^#$#ing clue), on average, you get the right answer. The problem is that for 50 years, they have tried to apply this to the future, but it doesn't work. In regards to this specific problem, a market attracts people who are EXPERTS, so Delphi really doesn't apply. There is, however, another theory, that says markets and betting by experts can predict an answer. Naval intelligence used this technique to find the H-Bombs dropped off Spain in the 1960s and the Russian SSBN that sunk in the Pacific, later partially recovered by the Glomar Explorer (Source, Blind Man's bluff). The problem with applying it to terrorism is that it functions not to unearth data, but in aggregate to filter data out, and terrorism is a data poor, as opposed to a data rich situation. I think that it was bad idea that was driven by a philosophy that markets solve every problem. BTW, it was me on the CSPAN morning call in raising Delphi a few days ago. ![]() -- --Matthew Saroff Rules to live by: 1) To thine own self be true 2) Don't let your mouth write no checks that your butt can't cash 3) Interference in the time stream is forbidden, do not meddle in causality Check http://www.pobox.com/~msaroff, including The Bad Hair Web Page |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() To rephrase my other post, Lend Lease = US involvement in European front of WWII. But that's wrong though. Lend Lease = US involvement in *Britian's* front of WWII. Just a minor point, lend lease also went to the USSR and Free France. Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | August 11th 04 03:55 AM |