![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message ...
"s.p.i." wrote in message om... "Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message ... The United States spends more on defense than the entire continent of Europe including Russia. We spend more than the entire continent of Asia including China and India. We spend more on defense than the top ten nations combined. Going to your analogy, the Germans had less equipment than their enemies, yet could win battles by better methods. The US does not face this challenge. Ten years from now its entirely plausible that some wily potential opponents in that region may well have the capacity to outmatch us in terms of Concentration Of Force fi we had to meet them near or on their home turf. Of course the US can be outnumbered at a moments notice. The Chinese could outnumber us in the Taiwan straights by tomorrow as could the Nigerians in Benin. But whatever they sieze, they could not hold. Maybe you could describe a reasonable scenerio where we cannot put more resources on the battlefield than our enemy. Iraq #1 was an almost worst case example, with a very well armed and experienced opponent about as far from the US as one can be. So, if you could offer a reasonable scenerio. This one gives the gist anyway: http://www.capitolsource.net/files/p...y_strategy.pdf |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"s.p.i." wrote in message om... "Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message ... Maybe you could describe a reasonable scenerio where we cannot put more resources on the battlefield than our enemy. Iraq #1 was an almost worst case example, with a very well armed and experienced opponent about as far from the US as one can be. So, if you could offer a reasonable scenerio. This one gives the gist anyway: http://www.capitolsource.net/files/p...y_strategy.pdf Boy what a boring read. You're arguing that the Chinese will launch 'thousands' of ballistic missiles with 'advanced conventional warheads'. I'm not really worried about scenerios involving weapons that the Chinese don't have and currently cannot even build, and that no other nation on the planet has chosen to develop. Maybe we should end this conversation. It's uninteresting. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 03:39 AM |
| rec.aviation replaced by yahoo?? | Steve | Home Built | 12 | August 24th 03 07:37 PM |
| Israel may lease Boeing 767 tankers. | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 0 | August 8th 03 01:33 AM |