![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MB" == Matt Barrow writes:
MB And call your local DMV or Post Office. Why? Answering the phone is not their primary job or method of service, but it is for LockMart FSS. -- Too bad you can't just grab a tree by the very tip-top and bend it clear over the ground and then let her fly, because I bet you'd be amazed at all the stuff that comes flying out. - Jack Handey |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-05-13, Don Poitras wrote:
My first experience trying to get a clearance on the ground via Lockheed today. ... Tried the GCO, but no one answered. Plane behind me on taxiway is asking whether I'm trying GCO. "Yeah, but they're not answering. I had the same issue.. tried to get ahold of Kankakee in the Chicago area around 2am, and go no answer after making multiple attempts on all the frequencies in the area. It's a little unnerving to fly VFR at night w/out flight following. Is Lockheed now in charge of all FSS's? -- PM instructions: do a C4esar Ciph3r on my address; retain punctuation. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Justin Gombos wrote:
On 2007-05-13, Don Poitras wrote: My first experience trying to get a clearance on the ground via Lockheed today. ... Tried the GCO, but no one answered. Plane behind me on taxiway is asking whether I'm trying GCO. "Yeah, but they're not answering. I had the same issue.. tried to get ahold of Kankakee in the Chicago area around 2am, and go no answer after making multiple attempts on all the frequencies in the area. It's a little unnerving to fly VFR at night w/out flight following. Is Lockheed now in charge of all FSS's? Here's the transition schedule: http://www.afss.com/transition/ AOPA was originally very happy about all this: "And all of these enhanced services are being provided without user fees - AOPA made sure of that," Boyer said. "It is estimated that Lockheed's 10-year contract will actually save the government about $2.2 billion." Subtract .18 billion from that savings: Lockheed Martin is looking for a 10-percent increase in the fees it's being paid to take over flight services. According to a report from the Department of Transportation's Office of Inspector General, the company, which was awarded a $1.8 billion contract to assume the function, says it's owed another $177 million, mostly because the FAA didn't supply accurate labor cost information. -- PM instructions: do a C4esar Ciph3r on my address; retain punctuation. -- Don Poitras |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don Poitras" wrote in message ... Justin Gombos wrote: On 2007-05-13, Don Poitras wrote: My first experience trying to get a clearance on the ground via Lockheed today. ... Tried the GCO, but no one answered. Plane behind me on taxiway is asking whether I'm trying GCO. "Yeah, but they're not answering. I had the same issue.. tried to get ahold of Kankakee in the Chicago area around 2am, and go no answer after making multiple attempts on all the frequencies in the area. It's a little unnerving to fly VFR at night w/out flight following. Is Lockheed now in charge of all FSS's? Here's the transition schedule: http://www.afss.com/transition/ AOPA was originally very happy about all this: "And all of these enhanced services are being provided without user fees - AOPA made sure of that," Boyer said. "It is estimated that Lockheed's 10-year contract will actually save the government about $2.2 billion." Subtract .18 billion from that savings: Lockheed Martin is looking for a 10-percent increase in the fees it's being paid to take over flight services. According to a report from the Department of Transportation's Office of Inspector General, the company, which was awarded a $1.8 billion contract to assume the function, says it's owed another $177 million, mostly because the FAA didn't supply accurate labor cost information. And they didn't factor in retirements. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Justin Gombos" wrote in message news:GIr4i.18827$Qz.649@trndny09... I had the same issue.. tried to get ahold of Kankakee in the Chicago area around 2am, and go no answer after making multiple attempts on all the frequencies in the area. It's a little unnerving to fly VFR at night w/out flight following. Is Lockheed now in charge of all FSS's? Why would you call Kankakee FSS for flight following? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 30, 10:48 am, "Peter R." wrote:
Called Lockheed Martin FSS this AM for my flight briefing. Spent 20 minutes in the "we are experiencing high call volume" queue waiting for a live briefer to take my call. When one finally did, he was servicing my upstate NY state flight from Phoenix, Az. Nice enough briefer but so much for the local knowledge. Wasn't there a promise by Lockheed Martin that wait times would be one minute or less? In the four years I have been commuting by aircraft the longest I previously waited for a Buffalo FSS briefer was five minutes. -- Peter I guess everyone has different priorities. I am a VFR only pilot who uses DUATS along with other online sources. I usually check the day before to get a handle on trends. It was quite interesting today on the scanner today to hear a pilot contact several sources for weather info, each time relating his story of waiting on hold for 40 minutes and still not getting a briefing. Then he adds that this is the first time in seven years that he has flown VFR, as if it's some kind of a traumatic event. I look out the window and there's not a cloud in the sky. I check the weather and there's not a cloud in 300 miles. Do some really need a nanny holding their hand all the time? -- Gene Seibel Tales of Flight - http://pad39a.com/gene/tales.html Because I fly, I envy no one. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 May 2007 19:32:42 -0700, Gene Seibel wrote in
. com: Do some really need a nanny holding their hand all the time? Apparently the military do. They are always supposed to be on an IFR flight plan. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Twenty years! | Bob Kuykendall | Soaring | 12 | February 17th 06 05:45 PM |
Twenty Four Hour Spad Missions | W. D. Allen Sr. | Naval Aviation | 19 | February 12th 05 04:22 AM |
New and improved WX Brief | Wizard of Draws | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | September 12th 04 01:50 AM |
Awaiting Natalie's "interpretation of what he meant | Tarver Engineering | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | February 7th 04 05:07 PM |