![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Aircraft normally wait for thunderstorms to pass before taking off. No aircraft is safe in a thunderstorm. Yep. Our plane which was bound for Melbourne had to divert to sydney, because there were t-storms in Melbourne. Very bloody annoying as it didn't have enough petrol and so had to refuel (while we muttered on the plane) in Sydney and then continue on to Melbourne. -- Don't try to email me; I'm using the spammer du jour's email addy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ups.com... http://www.thenewstribune.com/886/story/55281.html Reading the story says "there were thunderstorms", and it says they took off "during a storm". It doesn't say they took off during a thunderstorm. It crashed 90 miles from the airport. That doesn't sound like a problem during takeoff to me. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Foley wrote in message ...
wrote in message oups.com... http://www.thenewstribune.com/886/story/55281.html Reading the story says "there were thunderstorms", and it says they took off "during a storm". It doesn't say they took off during a thunderstorm. It crashed 90 miles from the airport. That doesn't sound like a problem during takeoff to me. That initial claim was apperently due to some mixed up satellite signal. The plane actually crashed only 12 miles away. Engine failures or lightning are certainly possibilities. And I'm surprised that a terrorist bomb hasn't been mentioned...so far, since witnesses claimed hearing an explosion. - Rick |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... http://www.thenewstribune.com/886/story/55281.html It had waited an hour because of the rain, and so one would think that the severe part of the thunderstorm had moved out of the flight path. So under those qualifications, yes, they take off and land with thunderstorms in the area, all of the time. Take a look at this page, and scroll down to the file called "FedEx Diversions" to see how planes will zoom in close to and around thunderstorms. -- Jim in NC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans writes:
So under those qualifications, yes, they take off and land with thunderstorms in the area, all of the time. "Thunderstorms in the area" and "into thunderstorms" are two different things. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 6, 10:26 am, "Morgans" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com...http://www.thenewstribune.com/886/story/55281.html It had waited an hour because of the rain, and so one would think that the severe part of the thunderstorm had moved out of the flight path. So under those qualifications, yes, they take off and land with thunderstorms in the area, all of the time. Take a look at this page, and scroll down to the file called "FedEx Diversions" to see how planes will zoom in close to and around thunderstorms. I had this idea that that is why all heavies have doppler radar to avoid the CU's |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
george wrote in
ups.com: On May 6, 10:26 am, "Morgans" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... http://ww w.thenewstribune.com/886/story/55281.html It had waited an hour because of the rain, and so one would think that the severe part of the thunderstorm had moved out of the flight path. So under those qualifications, yes, they take off and land with thunderstorms in the area, all of the time. Take a look at this page, and scroll down to the file called "FedEx Diversions" to see how planes will zoom in close to and around thunderstorms. I had this idea that that is why all heavies have doppler radar to avoid the CU's No, they don't. Some heavies have it, but not all by any stretch. Bertie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 5, 3:48 pm, wrote:
http://www.thenewstribune.com/886/story/55281.html Yes, but the pilots aren't. ![]() -- Gene Seibel Tales of Flight - http://pad39a.com/gene/tales.html Because I fly, I envy no one. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New GNS 530 getting very hot - Is this normal ? | Roy N5804F | Owning | 3 | September 2nd 06 04:39 AM |
Air France Flt 358 vs. thunderstorms | [email protected] | Piloting | 11 | August 4th 05 03:34 AM |
Lycoming O-540, "normal" CHT/EGT??? | USA | Owning | 3 | August 1st 05 08:00 AM |
Is ear-popping normal | Piloting | 9 | April 24th 04 11:25 PM | |
Normal EGT - Very Low CHT | markjen | Owning | 7 | March 4th 04 01:54 PM |