![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message oups.com... snip Although I agree with the dangers of accidental engine starts, what I would like to know if there really have been any cases of inadvertant engines starts when the prop is turned half a rotation with the mixture in cut-off even if the magnetos were on. All the cases I am aware of are related to hand-propping, which is not the same as turning the prop to reposition the blades. I had a friend who claimed that he had a warm engine start in his hangar when he repositioned the prop. The hanger door was closed and he had nowhere to go. Claimed his back was against the door and he held his hand on the center of the spinner to stop the aircraft from moving forward. Luckily the fuel was shutoff and it only ran for a very short time. I forget where the gas came from. He may have been spinning a tale but he really wasn't that kind of guy. Happy landings. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Private" wrote in message news:0Ft2i.188319$aG1.182030@pd7urf3no... I had a friend who claimed that he had a warm engine start in his hangar when he repositioned the prop. The hanger door was closed and he had nowhere to go. Claimed his back was against the door and he held his hand on the center of the spinner to stop the aircraft from moving forward. Luckily the fuel was shutoff and it only ran for a very short time. I forget where the gas came from. He may have been spinning a tale but he really wasn't that kind of guy. Interesting. I used to know an old timer that told the same tale. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Private" wrote in message news:0Ft2i.188319$aG1.182030@pd7urf3no... "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message oups.com... snip Although I agree with the dangers of accidental engine starts, what I would like to know if there really have been any cases of inadvertant engines starts when the prop is turned half a rotation with the mixture in cut-off even if the magnetos were on. All the cases I am aware of are related to hand-propping, which is not the same as turning the prop to reposition the blades. I had a friend who claimed that he had a warm engine start in his hangar when he repositioned the prop. The hanger door was closed and he had nowhere to go. Claimed his back was against the door and he held his hand on the center of the spinner to stop the aircraft from moving forward. Luckily the fuel was shutoff and it only ran for a very short time. I forget where the gas came from. He may have been spinning a tale but he really wasn't that kind of guy. Happy landings. I hope he was wearing gloves! Actually I have either heard or read the same story a couple of times over the years, and I really do have my doubts. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Palmer" wrote in message ink.net... Several pilots found themselves in a debate at our field yesterday. The issue is weather it is safer to move the propeller on a (parked) aircraft in the direction of usual engine rotation, or opposite usual rotation. This is assuming that the propeller needs to move for some reason. The reasonings ranged from "you should not turn an engine backwards" to "turning the engine backwards disarms the impulse coupling", to several issues in between. Any thoughts from the groups collective wisdom? This is one issue where you don't want to get bogged down in the technicalities involving vacuum pumps and impulse couplings. The bottom line on this issue is that you should NEVER.....EVER...... trust a propeller not to kill you if you turn it by hand IN EITHER DIRECTION while it's attached to the airplane. Dudley Henriques |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Dudley Henriques" wrote: "Doug Palmer" wrote in message ink.net... Several pilots found themselves in a debate at our field yesterday. The issue is weather it is safer to move the propeller on a (parked) aircraft in the direction of usual engine rotation, or opposite usual rotation. This is assuming that the propeller needs to move for some reason. The reasonings ranged from "you should not turn an engine backwards" to "turning the engine backwards disarms the impulse coupling", to several issues in between. Any thoughts from the groups collective wisdom? This is one issue where you don't want to get bogged down in the technicalities involving vacuum pumps and impulse couplings. The bottom line on this issue is that you should NEVER.....EVER...... trust a propeller not to kill you if you turn it by hand IN EITHER DIRECTION while it's attached to the airplane. Dudley Henriques Some engines (I'm thinking Rotax in particular) are highly allergic to turning the prop backwards. On a Rotax, it introduces air into the oil galleys, which can result in premature engine failure. I subscribe to the following precautions: 1. Check mag grounding prior to shutdown. 2. shut down with idle cutoff and throttle at idle. 3. If you turn the prop, do so in a way that it will not strike either you or anything (or anyone else) if it kicks off. I actually had a prop hit me from residual compression (no ignition) one time. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-05-15 07:46:15 -0700, "Dudley Henriques" said:
"Doug Palmer" wrote in message ink.net... Several pilots found themselves in a debate at our field yesterday. The issue is weather it is safer to move the propeller on a (parked) aircraft in the direction of usual engine rotation, or opposite usual rotation. This is assuming that the propeller needs to move for some reason. The reasonings ranged from "you should not turn an engine backwards" to "turning the engine backwards disarms the impulse coupling", to several issues in between. Any thoughts from the groups collective wisdom? This is one issue where you don't want to get bogged down in the technicalities involving vacuum pumps and impulse couplings. The bottom line on this issue is that you should NEVER.....EVER...... trust a propeller not to kill you if you turn it by hand IN EITHER DIRECTION while it's attached to the airplane. Dudley Henriques People will say it is technically impossible, but I think it is wishful thinking. An engine may not run backwards very well, but I have seen too many malfunctioning magnetos to believe that it could never happen. It might be improbable, but I would not bet my life on the idea that it is impossible. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Several pilots found themselves in a debate at our field yesterday.
The issue is weather it is safer to move the propeller on a (parked) aircraft in the direction of usual engine rotation, or opposite usual rotation. This is assuming that the propeller needs to move for some reason. The reasonings ranged from "you should not turn an engine backwards" to "turning the engine backwards disarms the impulse coupling", to several issues in between. Any thoughts from the groups collective wisdom? This is one issue where you don't want to get bogged down in the technicalities involving vacuum pumps and impulse couplings. The bottom line on this issue is that you should NEVER.....EVER...... trust a propeller not to kill you if you turn it by hand IN EITHER DIRECTION while it's attached to the airplane. Dudley Henriques People will say it is technically impossible, but I think it is wishful thinking. An engine may not run backwards very well, but I have seen too many malfunctioning magnetos to believe that it could never happen. It might be improbable, but I would not bet my life on the idea that it is impossible. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor It doesn't really have to "run" to hit you, it only has to "kick" once. And that is cold comfort indeed, since immediate death is far from the worst thing that can happen to a person. (rant omitted) Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message news:2007051622001427544-christophercampbell@hotmailcom... People will say it is technically impossible, but I think it is wishful thinking. An engine may not run backwards very well, but I have seen too many malfunctioning magnetos to believe that it could never happen. It might be improbable, but I would not bet my life on the idea that it is impossible. -- On a 2 cycle engine, ignition time is all it takes. Some golf carts actually work that way. The starter and ignition time is selectable by the direction indicatior on the dash. But on a 4 cycle engine, the valve timing would have you intaking through the exhaust, and exhausting through the intake. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message news:2007051622001427544-christophercampbell@hotmailcom... On 2007-05-15 07:46:15 -0700, "Dudley Henriques" said: "Doug Palmer" wrote in message ink.net... Several pilots found themselves in a debate at our field yesterday. The issue is weather it is safer to move the propeller on a (parked) aircraft in the direction of usual engine rotation, or opposite usual rotation. This is assuming that the propeller needs to move for some reason. The reasonings ranged from "you should not turn an engine backwards" to "turning the engine backwards disarms the impulse coupling", to several issues in between. Any thoughts from the groups collective wisdom? This is one issue where you don't want to get bogged down in the technicalities involving vacuum pumps and impulse couplings. The bottom line on this issue is that you should NEVER.....EVER...... trust a propeller not to kill you if you turn it by hand IN EITHER DIRECTION while it's attached to the airplane. Dudley Henriques People will say it is technically impossible, but I think it is wishful thinking. An engine may not run backwards very well, but I have seen too many malfunctioning magnetos to believe that it could never happen. It might be improbable, but I would not bet my life on the idea that it is impossible. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor Rule number one for me has always been "never give the machinery an advantage". If it CAN kill me, it just MIGHT kill me, so I treat it that way. :-))) Dudley Henriques |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 16 May 2007 22:00:14 -0700, C J Campbell
wrote: People will say it is technically impossible, but I think it is wishful thinking. An engine may not run backwards very well, During World War II (really!) I worked on a farm in Concord, Mass. There was a great steel-wheeled tractor that was started with a hand crank. One time the tractor backfired while the lad was spinning the crank, and the engine started running backwards. He jumped aboard and had a great time wheeling it around the yard, one speed forward and three in reverse. Blue skies! -- Dan Ford |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is no | gasman | Soaring | 0 | August 26th 05 06:39 PM |
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 01:11 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |