A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Let's Get Real Here.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 28th 07, 05:29 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Let's Get Real Here.


"Bret Ludwig" wrote

Thanks to the Miracle of Moment we can use a small weight at the very
tail to put forward CG in balance with low amounts of total mass. Most
airplanes are way longer from the CG back than from the CG front.


Except for the little fact that the plane is not certified to carry around a
counterweight in the tailcone.
--
Jim in NC


  #2  
Old August 26th 07, 05:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default Let's Get Real Here.

On Aug 25, 6:43 pm, Bret Ludwig wrote:
Can two 300 pounders fly this thing?


A lot of them not for too long. Considering that obesity and heart
attacks.

  #3  
Old August 27th 07, 01:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Bret Ludwig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 138
Default Let's Get Real Here.

On Aug 25, 11:36 pm, wrote:
On Aug 25, 6:43 pm, Bret Ludwig wrote:

Can two 300 pounders fly this thing?


A lot of them not for too long. Considering that obesity and heart
attacks.


Many fat people-really fat-live surprisingly long lives. Marlon
Brando was morbidly obese for 35 of his 80 years at least-the last
ones-and Al Goldstein is not dead yet. Yes, it shortens lifespan, but
moderately fat people can live sometimes what would be pretty much the
normal lifespan. And since when they go, they generally drop over
clean and die rather than lingering like Ronald reagan, which costs
millions of dollars in health care sometimes. That's why prison
systems feed cons all they want and give them their own cell if they
are over a certain weight. What better way to keep them immobile and
reduce overall costs?

  #4  
Old August 26th 07, 04:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Let's Get Real Here.


"Bret Ludwig" wrote

3. The average person who can afford an airplane in America now
weighs upwards of 250 lbs and some top 300. Can two 300 pounders fly
this thing? I know CFIs who tell me they are starting Denny the
Dentist in Skylanes now because they are too fat to be comfortable in
the Skyhawk.


If they weigh that much, they need to go on an immediate diet, forget sport
planes, or take up mud bog racing instead of flying.

Get real. The person that weighs 250 pounds, is obese, unless they are very
tall. They need to worry about losing weight before they die, instead of
flying airplanes that are too small for them.
--
Jim in NC


  #5  
Old August 27th 07, 01:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Bret Ludwig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 138
Default Let's Get Real Here.

On Aug 25, 10:16 pm, "Morgans" wrote:
"Bret Ludwig" wrote

3. The average person who can afford an airplane in America now
weighs upwards of 250 lbs and some top 300. Can two 300 pounders fly
this thing? I know CFIs who tell me they are starting Denny the
Dentist in Skylanes now because they are too fat to be comfortable in
the Skyhawk.


If they weigh that much, they need to go on an immediate diet, forget sport
planes, or take up mud bog racing instead of flying.

Get real. The person that weighs 250 pounds, is obese, unless they are very
tall. They need to worry about losing weight before they die, instead of
flying airplanes that are too small for them.
--


Some people this heavy are not obese as muscular and huge, such as
football players. With exceptions such as "Refrigerator" Perry,
football players are not fat. Yet they weigh a lot. There are 6'4" 300
lb body builders who are considered "Greek Adonis" and not "fat".
Airplanes should be designed to comfortably accomodate NFL offensive
linesmen.

  #6  
Old August 27th 07, 01:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Let's Get Real Here.


"Bret Ludwig" wrote

Some people this heavy are not obese as muscular and huge, such as
football players. With exceptions such as "Refrigerator" Perry,
football players are not fat. Yet they weigh a lot. There are 6'4" 300
lb body builders who are considered "Greek Adonis" and not "fat".
Airplanes should be designed to comfortably accomodate NFL offensive
linesmen.


At what expense? Make all trainers capable of hauling weight as a T-34? I
thought you wanted to see less expensive planes?

I don't want to pay to haul around offensive linemen. Even then, your
argument is weak. You and I both know damn well that you are talking mainly
about the obese average height lard ass.

A NFL player can afford to go rent (or buy) a fleet of warbirds, or other
4-6 passenger planes. Let them. I can not.
--
Jim in NC


  #7  
Old August 27th 07, 03:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Dan[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 465
Default Let's Get Real Here.

Morgans wrote:
"Bret Ludwig" wrote
Some people this heavy are not obese as muscular and huge, such as
football players. With exceptions such as "Refrigerator" Perry,
football players are not fat. Yet they weigh a lot. There are 6'4" 300
lb body builders who are considered "Greek Adonis" and not "fat".
Airplanes should be designed to comfortably accomodate NFL offensive
linesmen.


At what expense? Make all trainers capable of hauling weight as a T-34? I
thought you wanted to see less expensive planes?

I don't want to pay to haul around offensive linemen. Even then, your
argument is weak. You and I both know damn well that you are talking mainly
about the obese average height lard ass.

A NFL player can afford to go rent (or buy) a fleet of warbirds, or other
4-6 passenger planes. Let them. I can not.


Don't let anyone accuse you have a sensitive side.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #8  
Old August 28th 07, 01:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Let's Get Real Here.


"Dan" wrote in message
...
Morgans wrote:
"Bret Ludwig" wrote
Some people this heavy are not obese as muscular and huge, such as
football players. With exceptions such as "Refrigerator" Perry,
football players are not fat. Yet they weigh a lot. There are 6'4" 300
lb body builders who are considered "Greek Adonis" and not "fat".
Airplanes should be designed to comfortably accomodate NFL offensive
linesmen.


At what expense? Make all trainers capable of hauling weight as a T-34?

I
thought you wanted to see less expensive planes?

I don't want to pay to haul around offensive linemen. Even then, your
argument is weak. You and I both know damn well that you are talking

mainly
about the obese average height lard ass.

A NFL player can afford to go rent (or buy) a fleet of warbirds, or

other
4-6 passenger planes. Let them. I can not.


Don't let anyone accuse you have a sensitive side.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


IMHO, the weight limits on Light Sport are the totally unreasonable
determination of a bunch of desk jockeys. At the very least, they should
have accomodated the weights of two seat basic trainers commonly made and
used in the United States. The cost to build and maintain an aircraft of
750KG gross weigth would not be substantially more than for a 600KG
aircraft--and would very likely be less. In attition, it would have put
more companies and craftsmen back to work here in the USA.

Peter
Grrrrr.....


  #9  
Old August 28th 07, 05:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Bret Ludwig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 138
Default Let's Get Real Here.

On Aug 26, 7:36 pm, "Morgans" wrote:
"Bret Ludwig" wrote



Some people this heavy are not obese as muscular and huge, such as
football players. With exceptions such as "Refrigerator" Perry,
football players are not fat. Yet they weigh a lot. There are 6'4" 300
lb body builders who are considered "Greek Adonis" and not "fat".
Airplanes should be designed to comfortably accomodate NFL offensive
linesmen.


At what expense? Make all trainers capable of hauling weight as a T-34? I
thought you wanted to see less expensive planes?



Key to cost reduction is volume.

The T-34 is the airplane people WANT. Study Trade-A-Plane.

And it isn't even a particularly good airplane.

Study too why MOTORCYCLING is very successful with huge market growth
in the last 50 years and GA is not. Despite being even more
dangerous. Let me know what you think it is. Hint: The Usual Reason
is horse**** and I can prove it.


  #10  
Old August 28th 07, 03:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Let's Get Real Here.


The T-34 is the airplane people WANT. Study Trade-A-Plane.

And it isn't even a particularly good airplane.

Study too why MOTORCYCLING is very successful with huge market growth
in the last 50 years and GA is not. Despite being even more
dangerous. Let me know what you think it is. Hint: The Usual Reason
is horse**** and I can prove it.


I'm too damned lazy to study it, but just assumed it was ecause you can can
drive your motorcycle to the nearest bar, blip the throttle a cople of
times, and strut inside...

Peter


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is this for real!?!?!? Casey Wilson Piloting 4 May 13th 06 08:40 PM
FS: Real Bicycle Seats for Real People! [email protected] Aviation Marketplace 0 February 22nd 06 10:24 PM
Real or CGI? Flyingmonk Piloting 3 February 10th 06 12:30 AM
Real-time real world air traffic in flight sims Marty Ross Simulators 6 September 1st 03 04:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.