A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Am I an idiot? Low experience; high performance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 29th 07, 03:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Luke Skywalker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 102
Default Am I an idiot? Low experience; high performance

On Aug 28, 6:56 pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Aug 28, 4:08 pm, Luke Skywalker wrote:

On Aug 28, 5:52 pm, wrote:


The "speed" of the airplane is largely irrelevant to safety. It is a
part of it, one has to think faster at 300 knts then at 100...but my
experience is that the same mistakes that happen at 100 knots just
happen faster at 300...


If you read Richard Collins he has long shown stasticial correlations
between accident rates and speed in owner flown GA. For instance the
Mooney has more accidents than the nearly identical (but slower)
Arrow. Richard's theory is that the more speed the plane has the more
weather systems and variety of environments you encounter. I tend to
agree with him.

The insurance cost will be "higher".


Yea, my student had a similar model Mooney to mine and he paid an
extra $4K per year for insurance.


Hello

I've read Richard Collins for a long time and who the heck am I to
disagree with him....but I do and I dont.

I do in that I think that the faster the airplane flies, the more
complex etc the more likely flaws in the decision making process are
going to be exposed...but I disagree in that I think that the flaws
are still the same wheather it is an ultralight or a B-757. It is
just the issue of when the error chain starts backing up fast enough
so that it is unrecoverable and then finally fatal.

My take is that I dont have a very good view on "MOST" of the private
pilot training programs that are out there. They are not very
"rigorized" meaning that methods and procedures are not stressed from
day 1 and drilled into students. Hence very quickly after the private
people start originating with little competence their own methods.
My first, non government but he was a product of government and
airline training programs, instructor was methodical about "inspiring"
Into me a "rhythum" of procedures and that was when we were just
flying the Cub. There was nothing that was "seat of the pants".

I dont see that in a lot of people, even when they get ready to go for
the commuter airline ranks. Now most of them will put that into the
folks or the folks leave......but my experience is that the speed
(velocity) of the plane while important pales behind getting a method
down and using it.

Robert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Complex / High Performance / Low Performance R.T. Owning 22 July 6th 04 09:04 AM
IVO pireps wanted.. high performance/high speed... Dave S Home Built 8 June 2nd 04 05:12 PM
More on High Performance Insurance Jay Honeck Owning 25 December 15th 03 04:24 AM
High performance homebuilt in the UK NigelPocock Home Built 0 August 18th 03 09:35 PM
High performance Chris Gumm Piloting 6 August 9th 03 07:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.