A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ATC Controllers Pay For Their Errors



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 10th 07, 07:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kloudy via AviationKB.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 376
Default ATC Controllers Pay For Their Errors

Kloudy wrote:

I think you mena seppuku


I think I mena...

uh.. "mean". ; )

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200709/1

  #12  
Old September 10th 07, 10:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default ATC Controllers Pay For Their Errors

On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:22:12 -0400, The Visitor
wrote in
:

Remember this one?
http://tinyurl.com/yt3526


"a maintenance manager working for the company at Haneda committed
suicide to "apologize" for the accident."


520 Deaths for the want of a row of rivets:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Airlines_Flight_123
The subsequent repair performed by Boeing was flawed. Boeing's
procedures called for a doubler plate with two rows of rivets to
cover up the damaged bulkhead, but the engineers fixing the
aircraft used two doubler plates with only one row of rivets. This
reduced the part's resistance to metal fatigue by 70%. According
to the FAA, the one "doubler plate" which was specified for the
job, (the FAA calls it a "splice plate" - essentially a patch),
was surprisingly cut into two pieces parallel to the stress crack
it was intended to reinforce, "to make it fit".[3] This negated
the effectiveness of one of the two rows of rivets. During the
investigation Boeing calculated that this incorrect installation
would fail after approximately 10,000 pressurizations; the
aircraft accomplished 12,319 take-offs between the installation of
the new plate and the final accident.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DFW ATC identifying Operational Errors As Pilot Errors? Larry Dighera Piloting 8 July 18th 07 10:49 PM
OLC errors ! Mal[_3_] Soaring 0 April 17th 07 12:33 PM
Count the errors here... Kingfish Piloting 12 December 15th 06 10:39 PM
NE-2 and NE-4 chart errors Matt Whiting Instrument Flight Rules 10 September 6th 05 06:56 PM
TE errors f.blair Soaring 7 March 9th 05 08:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.