![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Montblack wrote:
("Dudley Henriques" wrote) I notice that some of my flash drives are FAT16 and some are FAT32. Their general use is on the IMac, but every now and then I need to carry a file on over to the PC. I'm not having trouble doing this. My question concerns whether or not there is any advantage in using FAT16 over 32 or visa versa? I had an odd screen pop up when I tried using a Western Digital (external) 120 G Hard Drive, as a go between, for an XP to Vista "Easy Transfer" files & settings conversion. Vista did not like the FAT 32 format of the WD Hard Drive. The "Easy Transfer" software was installed on both pc's. Anyway, I finally got frustrated and bought the kit, with (special) cable, instead. Montblack http://artfiles.art.com/images/-/M-Ryerson/Expose-Yourself-to-Art-Print-C10036661.jpeg Flash answer Thanks much. Appreciate it. -- Dudley Henriques |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote:
My question concerns whether or not there is any advantage in using FAT16 over 32 or visa versa? FAT16: Max total volume size: 2GB Number of files: 65,517 Larger allocation unit size (more "waste" for files that don't take up full allocation units). FAT32: Max volume size: 8TB Number of files: 268,435,437 Smaller allocation unit size That's it, really. Unless these memory sticks are very large (or you have an outrageous number of files on them) either file system will work just fine (as both computers are equally capable of dealing with them). I'd pick FAT32 if given the choice, and I think the Mac paranoia is probably just because Apple hasn't dealt with the FAT system for quite as long as PC OS' have (and so might have options for FAT32 formatting that are unavailable to the Mac). TheSmokingGnu |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TheSmokingGnu wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote: My question concerns whether or not there is any advantage in using FAT16 over 32 or visa versa? FAT16: Max total volume size: 2GB Number of files: 65,517 Larger allocation unit size (more "waste" for files that don't take up full allocation units). FAT32: Max volume size: 8TB Number of files: 268,435,437 Smaller allocation unit size That's it, really. Unless these memory sticks are very large (or you have an outrageous number of files on them) either file system will work just fine (as both computers are equally capable of dealing with them). I'd pick FAT32 if given the choice, and I think the Mac paranoia is probably just because Apple hasn't dealt with the FAT system for quite as long as PC OS' have (and so might have options for FAT32 formatting that are unavailable to the Mac). TheSmokingGnu Great data. Thanks. -- Dudley Henriques |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAS widget for macs | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | January 3rd 07 10:39 AM |
Flash GPS Opinions? | Mike | Soaring | 6 | March 28th 06 05:51 PM |
Updated help for ILEC SN10 pilots with Macs | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | March 23rd 06 10:36 PM |
Bendix drives. | JDupre5762 | Home Built | 6 | May 16th 04 01:23 PM |
430/530 Back Course Question... | Bill Hale | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | February 12th 04 05:04 AM |