Should We Bomb Syria and Iran?

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:20:24 -0500, "tscottme"
wrote:

Alan Minyard wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:16:18 -0500, "tscottme"
wrote:

There are numerous examples of Israel pulling back or helping the
"palestinians" only to have that be taken as a sign of weakness and
increased terrorism followed. For Pete's sake the Israelis equipped
the
PA police, they pulled out of Lebanon behind UN mandated lines, left
the
West Bank until attacks forced them to return.

Israel is only further along the same path the US has just started on
fighting terrorism.

There already is a palestinian state, it's called Jordan. The
Hashemites should pick up their toys and return to the Arabian
peninsula.

Israel is not a proponent of peace. They, like the Palestinians, seek
the utter destruction of their "enemies". The settlements in
Palestinian territory illustrate this. "Let he who is without sin cast
the first stone".

Al Minyard

Is that why Israel left Lebanon, behind a UN approved border, equipped
the Palestinian Authority, due to Oslo, and fenced and remained out of
Gaza because they are seeking to destroy the people that murder them?
Israel offered a very large proportion of the land the "palestinians"
demanded and the response was not a counter-offer, not an argument, but
another war. Why the "palestinians" haven't been expelled to Jordan
where they belong is funny. Jordan is 70+ percent of Palestine, it's
populated by 60+ percent "palestinians" and the Hashemites are an
occupying Arabian tribe, yet they only want the land of the Jews. Look
at the map of Palestine that Arafat's group wants, it's all of the area,
except for Jordan, since Jordan kicked their ass and doesn't wilt to
charges of "bias".

You don't know what you are talking about and assume that issuing equal
blame for both sides makes you sound fair and impartial.

I know quite well what I am talking about. Theocracies are evil,
always have been, always will be.

Al Minyard

On 13 Oct 2003 23:24:51 -0700, Kenneth Williams wrote:
President Bush said that in addition to striking terorists directly
that the US would also target those who harbor terrorists.

I think it is clear that both Syria and Iran harbor terrorists and
export terror in the region- especially in Israel, with Hamas and
Islamic Jihad and even in Iraq against our own troops.

Shouldn't we, like our Israeli friends, bomb Syria and Iran in
pre-emptive or retaliatory strikes? I wouldn't like a widening of the
war in the region but under these circumstances won't we eventually be
forced to do something drastic?

What is the general concensus here at RAM?

I think we should bomb your house, and then nuke you until you are
radioactive cinders.

I personally think Iran is the worst of the two and should be bombed
if Tehran does not cooperate with the nuclear inspectors on its covert
nuclear weapons program. The US can't afford to have a nuclear-armed
Iran sitting right next door when the US is trying to rebuild Iraq and
allowing democracy in that region.

Ha ha ha. And if the majority of the people in rebuilt Iraq wanted
to have nuclear weapons, would the USA let them? No of course not,
the only people in the middle east to be allowed nukes are Israel
and not the racially inferior (according to the USA) Arabs. And if
you support that policy, then you are a filthy contemptable racist
too.

On the subject of democracy, Iran's president is the guy who got the
most votes, something that can't be said for the USA. But I suppose
thatc doesn't fit in with Bush's idea of democracy, which seems more
about subservience to US corporate interests.

--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(My real email address would be if you added 275
to it and reversed the last two letters).

"phil hunt" wrote in message


On the subject of democracy, Iran's president is the guy who got the
most votes, something that can't be said for the USA. But I suppose
thatc doesn't fit in with Bush's idea of democracy, which seems more
about subservience to US corporate interests.

Incorrect. Also, the United States is a representative republic, not a
"democracy". They are very similar but not the same at all.

--
http://www.delversdungeon.dragonsfoot.org
Remove the X's in my email address to respond.
"Damn you Silvey, and your endless fortunes." - Stephen Weir
I hate furries.