![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big John writes:
You must have some experience with a drinking problem? I don't use recreational or illicit drugs at all. I can rinse my mouth out with a mouth wash that contains alcohol and I then cannot pass the 'breathalizer' test. So? You won't fail a blood test. If I don't fly (legally) drunk (test does not evaluate your ability to make correct decisions and act accordingly) what is it of interest what I do on my time off if I meet the 12 hours from bottle to stick. Twelve hours should be sufficient for most purposes. It would be better not to drink at all, but I realize how addicted some people are to the drug. You need personal experience (with the use of alcohol which I have) to comment on the stupid original posting. Drinkers often try to rationalize their reckless use of the drug, a behavior that is common to substance abusers in general. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:18:55 +0100, Mxsmanic
wrote: Big John writes: You must have some experience with a drinking problem? I don't use recreational or illicit drugs at all. I can rinse my mouth out with a mouth wash that contains alcohol and I then cannot pass the 'breathalizer' test. So? You won't fail a blood test. If I don't fly (legally) drunk (test does not evaluate your ability to make correct decisions and act accordingly) what is it of interest what I do on my time off if I meet the 12 hours from bottle to stick. Twelve hours should be sufficient for most purposes. It would be better not to drink at all, but I realize how addicted some people are to the drug. You need personal experience (with the use of alcohol which I have) to comment on the stupid original posting. Drinkers often try to rationalize their reckless use of the drug, a behavior that is common to substance abusers in general. Again nothing but idiot remarks. Please get with it. Since you apparently don't fly yiu don't know the rules thuddddddddddddddddddd. You keep talking about drugs. What drugs are you talking about? Big John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... And people who are willing to drive drunk are generally willing to fly drunk as well. I disagree. I know hundreds of pilots, but not a single one who will fly after drinking. I know plenty if people who will drive after drinking. I mistrust your sample. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nobody writes:
I disagree. I know hundreds of pilots, but not a single one who will fly after drinking. How many of them have been cited for driving while intoxicated? I know plenty if people who will drive after drinking. I mistrust your sample. How many pilots do you know who will drive after drinking but won't fly? In general, if a drinker manages to rationalize driving under the influence, it's not really any different to rationalize flying under the influence. Even airline pilots are caught at this. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... nobody writes: I disagree. I know hundreds of pilots, but not a single one who will fly after drinking. How many of them have been cited for driving while intoxicated? None. How many pilots do you know who will drive after drinking but won't fly? I can think of at least ten In general, if a drinker manages to rationalize driving under the influence, it's not really any different to rationalize flying under the influence. As I said, I mistrust your sample. I socialize with pilots and non-pilots. How many pilots do you socialize with? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... nobody writes: I disagree. I know hundreds of pilots, but not a single one who will fly after drinking. How many of them have been cited for driving while intoxicated? I know plenty if people who will drive after drinking. I mistrust your sample. How many pilots do you know who will drive after drinking but won't fly? Quite a few. In general, if a drinker manages to rationalize driving under the influence, it's not really any different to rationalize flying under the influence. Wrong. Loss of judgment due to addiction is incremental, not a binary state. Even airline pilots are caught at this. Almost always only after they have reached an advanced stage in their addiction. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: nobody writes: I disagree. I know hundreds of pilots, but not a single one who will fly after drinking. How many of them have been cited for driving while intoxicated? I know plenty if people who will drive after drinking. I mistrust your sample. How many pilots do you know who will drive after drinking but won't fly? Dozens. Bertie |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:20:10 +0100, Mxsmanic
wrote: nobody writes: I disagree. I know hundreds of pilots, but not a single one who will fly after drinking. How many of them have been cited for driving while intoxicated? I know plenty if people who will drive after drinking. I mistrust your sample. How many pilots do you know who will drive after drinking but won't fly? In general, if a drinker manages to rationalize driving under the influence, it's not really any different to rationalize flying under the influence. Even airline pilots are caught at this. I'm getting to feel more like Bertie. Your not only a closet idiot but a big A** hole. I'm gone. Have a bad day. I can't waste my more time with A** holes. Big John |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wolfgang Schwanke writes:
I know a couple. They will happily drive their car after having a glass of beer, but the same people would never think of flying a plane after the same beer. Why do they make the distinction? Car accidents are much more common than airplane accidents, and typically 50% involve alcohol. How do they justify driving under the influence of the drug? And if they think it's okay, how can one be sure that they won't make the same mistake when flying? Apparently many other people think they're different. Yes. That's why so many people die in vehicular accidents after consuming alcohol. They always think they are special. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Some Other Guy" wrote in message ... Big John wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:24:42 -0800 (PST), javawizard wrote: A newspaper reporter discovered that 41 commercial airline pilots in Minnesota have had their car drivers' licenses revoked due to drunken driving, yet they are still flying jumbo jets. - from the Transportation section of www.odd-info.com What does a car drivers license have to do with flying a jet transport? In Ontario, Canada, they can technically charge you with drunk driving and suspend your driver's license if you are over the limit on a sailboat or even a bicycle. What does a bicycle or sailboat have to do with a motor vehicle? Beats me. You're "drinking" record. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An Unexpected Treat | Jay Beckman | Piloting | 14 | March 13th 07 03:01 PM |
Glider in an unexpected place... | Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe | Soaring | 3 | September 15th 06 03:56 AM |
Headset: Unexpected safety bonus | Vaughn | Owning | 16 | January 18th 06 02:27 AM |
ATTN: Commercial or military pilots- Boy Scout needs a favor | [email protected] | Piloting | 1 | March 18th 05 03:49 AM |
Did commercial glider pilots used to give instruction? | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 7 | December 19th 03 07:51 AM |