![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
However, if this thing works out, a 10 hour, 1000NM range electric airplane
is actually possible. What are you basing that statement on? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... However, if this thing works out, a 10 hour, 1000NM range electric airplane is actually possible. What are you basing that statement on? That there have been one hour and 100 miles flights made with the old Li-Po batteries. Even if it's half that, electrics would be viable. Bill Daniels |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That there have been one hour and 100 miles flights made with the old Li-Po
batteries. Even if it's half that, electrics would be viable. In what aircraft was that? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... That there have been one hour and 100 miles flights made with the old Li-Po batteries. Even if it's half that, electrics would be viable. In what aircraft was that? None, at present. He is talking about an airplane, if it were equipped with some new batteries that are being developed, seen in an earlier link, that could have a 10 fold increase in capacity, and with quicker recharge times, as icing on the cake. -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 23, 11:12*pm, "Morgans" wrote:
wrote in message ... That there have been one hour and 100 miles flights made with the old Li-Po batteries. Even if it's half that, electrics would be viable. In what aircraft was that? None, at present. Hmm. I don't think 10 fold would do the trick. The math shouldn't be too hard to show one way or another. P = IV. Too much ampere draw to move a plane. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 21, 10:50*am, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
Take a look at this:http://www.electronista.com/articles...owire.battery/ OK, it's just a laboratory development and needs to work it's way through all the R&D to become an actual product. *But, an order of magnetude improvement? WOW! Of course, as many 'negative experts' will point out, if this thing shorts out, your airplane goes supernova. However, if this thing works out, a 10 hour, 1000NM range electric airplane is actually possible. Bill Daniels http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8Pb_psj1A8 Wil |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Daniels wrote:
Take a look at this: http://www.electronista.com/articles...owire.battery/ OK, it's just a laboratory development and needs to work it's way through all the R&D to become an actual product. But, an order of magnetude improvement? WOW! Of course, as many 'negative experts' will point out, if this thing shorts out, your airplane goes supernova. However, if this thing works out, a 10 hour, 1000NM range electric airplane is actually possible. Bill Daniels I wonder why we haven't seen diesel/electric aircraft... surely a small round engine would allow for cleaner airflow and you can stick the diesel wherever you want to... something like the BD-5 wouldn't have transmission/driveshaft problems (though possibly a weight problem on such a small aircraft). As technology improves, replace the diesel with batteries or fuel cells while more or less retaining CG. And something like a V22, you might even be saving weight since you can drop the physical transmissions and driveshafts. rpl |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
rpl wrote: Bill Daniels wrote: Take a look at this: http://www.electronista.com/articles...owire.battery/ OK, it's just a laboratory development and needs to work it's way through all the R&D to become an actual product. But, an order of magnetude improvement? WOW! Of course, as many 'negative experts' will point out, if this thing shorts out, your airplane goes supernova. However, if this thing works out, a 10 hour, 1000NM range electric airplane is actually possible. Bill Daniels I wonder why we haven't seen diesel/electric aircraft... surely a small round engine would allow for cleaner airflow and you can stick the diesel wherever you want to... something like the BD-5 wouldn't have transmission/driveshaft problems (though possibly a weight problem on such a small aircraft). As technology improves, replace the diesel with batteries or fuel cells while more or less retaining CG. And something like a V22, you might even be saving weight since you can drop the physical transmissions and driveshafts. Because the damn Diesel-electric setup: 1. weighs too damn much 2. Adds another potential inline failure mode 3. Reduces overall fuel efficiency. -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electric maned airplane | Flyingmonk | Piloting | 26 | July 20th 06 05:43 AM |
Electric maned airplane | Flyingmonk | Home Built | 26 | July 20th 06 05:43 AM |
Electric maned airplane | Morgans | Home Built | 4 | July 19th 06 02:28 AM |
Electric RC Helicopter for $83 | NYPT Man | Home Built | 0 | October 24th 05 06:47 PM |
Electric DG | Robbie S. | Owning | 0 | March 19th 05 03:20 AM |