![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F. Baum wrote:
I had heard this could happen on the 150/152 when they are overstressed, but I never heard of it on the bigger Cessnas. Always wondered how common this is, any other RAP fans had this happen? When I was a 172 owner, I had a Cessna service letter or service bulletin in my file about the importance of windshield maintenance. It stated that the 172 could not maintain altitude with the windshield out. Soon after reading that, one of my fellow 172 owners at the airport proved it. He managed to hit a turkey buzzard and took out the right side and part of the left side of the windshield. He told me that the best he could do was 1200 fpm down, with full power applied. As I recall, he ended up landing (so to speak) on the access road to a state park campground. He arrested some of the descent rate by yanking back on the yoke at the last second, but the plane destroyed itself when it ran through a low rock wall. Apparently, knocking a big hole in the front of the 172's airframe makes the fuselage act like a big, draggy parachute. I don't know if the larger Cessnas have enough reserve power to overcome the drag. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted via AviationKB.com http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200801/1 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 4, 6:41 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
I have been told that most low powered cessnas and the like will not hold altitude with the windscreen out. Open the side windows. Lessen the air dam |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|