A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Powering JSF: One Engine Is Enough.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 11th 08, 01:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Richard Casady
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default Powering JSF: One Engine Is Enough.

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 01:10:46 -0600, Ian MacLure wrote:

Indeed.
And then there are the folks, who refer to what might rate
as an FFG only by courtesy, as a "battleship".


They are simply taking ' battleship' to mean 'ship for battle'.
Warship in other words. Not as important to get it right, now that all
the proper BB have gone.

Casady
  #2  
Old February 12th 08, 04:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Gernot Hassenpflug[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Powering JSF: One Engine Is Enough.

Ian MacLure writes:

"dott.Piergiorgio" wrote in
:

Ed Rasimus ha scritto:

And, don't even get started on the one engine versus two engine
aircraft business. Single engine fighters have been doing quite nicely
for decades....ooops, make that more than a century.


More a century, yes, for *aircrafts* ; for *fighters* I guess we're
still 5-7 years prior of a century of Fighters.... (depend on one's
interpretation of what bird was the first Fighter...)


Uh Dottore, thats "aircraft" not "aircrafts". Plural same as
singular. Like "moose" and "moose".


Not to worry Dottore, my best friend, and Israeli, constantly says
"sheeps" for the plural of "sheep" which is absolutely hilarious: "See
any sheeps today?" As we're often referring to the ridiculous attire
of Japanese girls for wedding receptions, where the slightly shorter
than Western legs attached to a sinking bottom are poking out from
under a fluffed-up dress, and similarly puffed-up hairstyles decorate
the top. You get the idea!
--
BOFH excuse #402:

Secretary sent chain letter to all 5000 employees.
  #3  
Old February 12th 08, 08:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
dott.Piergiorgio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 56
Default Powering JSF: One Engine Is Enough.

Gernot Hassenpflug ha scritto:


Not to worry Dottore, my best friend, and Israeli, constantly says
"sheeps" for the plural of "sheep" which is absolutely hilarious: "See
any sheeps today?" As we're often referring to the ridiculous attire
of Japanese girls for wedding receptions, where the slightly shorter
than Western legs attached to a sinking bottom are poking out from
under a fluffed-up dress, and similarly puffed-up hairstyles decorate
the top. You get the idea!


Aside that I refer to J-Girls as "Foemina Japonicus" (subtly pointing
that they're a different stock of women) I roughly agree about japanese
girl's dressing; I think that is because of the tendency of Japanese
legs to being not exactly straight; but I disagree about sinking
bottoms; I take this for what in this part of Italy we call "culi bassi"
that is, bottoms whose are low; In my experience with Japanese girls,
both in pics and in RL, I think the standard definition I give for their
asses is "flat" ("Culo piatto"), that is, aren't bulging from the back.

I guess that this stem from the Latin vs. German POV on female Aesthetic

Best regards from Italy,
Dott. Piergiorgio.
  #4  
Old February 9th 08, 01:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.military, rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Jack Linthicum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default Powering JSF: One Engine Is Enough.

On Feb 8, 7:30 pm, "dott.Piergiorgio"
wrote:
Ed Rasimus ha scritto:

And, don't even get started on the one engine versus two engine
aircraft business. Single engine fighters have been doing quite nicely
for decades....ooops, make that more than a century.


More a century, yes, for *aircrafts* ; for *fighters* I guess we're
still 5-7 years prior of a century of Fighters.... (depend on one's
interpretation of what bird was the first Fighter...)

Best regards from Italy,
Dott. Piergiorgio.


Morane-Saulnier, Roland Garros used a set of steel wedges to deflect
the rounds that hit the propeller. He eventually shot down, by a
rifleman, and landed behind the German lines. The Germans looked at
the idea and rejected it, turned the problem over to Anthony Fokker
who had been working on the problem of forward-firing machine guns and
came up with synchronized firing using an interrupter cam.

The EI and EII generally used a single Spandau MG with 500 rounds, the
EIII eventually added a second gun.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWmorane.htm
  #5  
Old February 10th 08, 12:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.military, rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Gordon[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default Powering JSF: One Engine Is Enough.

On Feb 9, 7:38*am, Jack Linthicum wrote:
On Feb 8, 7:30 pm, "dott.Piergiorgio"

wrote:
Ed Rasimus ha scritto:


And, don't even get started on the one engine versus two engine
aircraft business. Single engine fighters have been doing quite nicely
for decades....ooops, make that more than a century.


More a century, yes, for *aircrafts* ; for *fighters* I guess we're
still 5-7 years prior of a century of Fighters.... (depend on one's
interpretation of what bird was the first Fighter...)


Best regards from Italy,
Dott. Piergiorgio.


Morane-Saulnier, Roland Garros used a set of steel wedges to deflect
the rounds that hit the propeller. He eventually shot down, by a
rifleman, and landed behind the German lines.


The mythology that we are taught here in America is that he was
blipping his motor during an attack on a railway station and he
couldn't get the engine to 'un-blip. What followed, I imagine, was a
pregnant silence, then a blast of French vitriol, and ultimately a
hand-delivered war prize. Fokker's reply resulted in the most radical
advance in air warfare to date. I may have the details convoluted; I
suffer from "too many books read", with too many variations between
them - and you can never tell which version is really giving the right
story.

Gordon
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Engine-out procedures and eccentric forces on engine pylons Mxsmanic Piloting 18 May 26th 07 01:03 AM
Westland Wyvern Prototype - RR Eagle Engine - Rolls Royce Eagle 24cyl Liq Cooled Engine.jpg Ramapo Aviation Photos 0 April 17th 07 09:14 PM
Saturn V F-1 Engine Testing at F-1 Engine Test Stand 6866986.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 1 April 11th 07 04:48 PM
F-1 Engine for the Saturn V S-IC (first) stage depicts the complexity of the engine 6413912.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 0 April 9th 07 01:38 PM
1710 allison v-12 engine WWII p 38 engine Holger Stephan Home Built 9 August 21st 03 08:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.