|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
February 16th 08, 01:45 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
Why so expensive (flight recorders)
On 15 Feb, 21:08, Papa3 wrote:
On Feb 15, 9:09 am, nimbusgb [Jim wrote: and can provide just as secure a record for badge flights] [Ian wrote: Not even nearly] Okay Ian - prove it. Prove that a COTS unit governed under the manual OO procedures I've laid out in the referenced link doesn't provide an equivalent level of security. Come on, I dare ya :-) http://home.netcom.com/~pappa3/files...rity_draft.pdf A cots GPS is still not as secure as an IGC logger. Your presentation appears to have merit and I'd support using it for badges. Ian 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Standalone Flight Recorders for Club Use | ContestID67 | Soaring | 8 | April 24th 07 02:27 AM |
| Amendment 9 to the Technical Specification for IGC Flight Recorders | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | July 1st 06 07:50 PM |
| IGC-approval levels for some types of Flight Recorders | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 42 | March 19th 05 06:42 PM |
| Commercial - Mounts for GPS Flight Recorders | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | March 13th 04 03:03 PM |
| Approved IGC Flight recorders | mat Redsell | Soaring | 2 | March 5th 04 04:35 PM |
Threaded Mode