![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denny" wrote in message ... I have a bad feeling about the military's intent to publically take a shot at it... dumb, dumb, dumb, and dumber - and likely to fail... So, here we go again, the laughing stock of the world... Also, totally unnecessary as the heat of reentry will set off the 'toxic' hypergolic fuel leaving nothing but scrap metal to impact... So, the desire to destroy HAS to be based in other reasons... At least the chinese were smart enough to take their shots in secret and only announce AFTER they hit it... But not our gov't and pentagon, nope, no waay, shoot their mouths off ahead of time so we can look really stupid... denny Only in your own mind... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 7:35*am, Denny wrote:
I have a bad feeling about the military's intent to publically take a shot at it... dumb, dumb, dumb, and dumber - and likely to fail... So, here we go again, the laughing stock of the world... Also, totally unnecessary as the heat of reentry will set off the 'toxic' hypergolic fuel leaving nothing but scrap metal to impact... So, the desire to destroy HAS to be based in other reasons... At least the chinese were smart enough to take their shots in secret and only announce AFTER they hit it... But not our gov't and pentagon, nope, no waay, shoot their mouths off ahead of time so we can look really stupid... denny It was a hit! No worries mate. Wil http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23265613/ Navy missile hits spy satellite Extraordinary operation requires steady seas and optimum positioning WASHINGTON - A missile launched from a Navy ship successfully struck a dying U.S. spy satellite passing 130 miles over the Pacific on Wednesday, a defense official said. Two officials said the missile was launched successfully just after 10:30 p.m. ET. One official, who is close to the process, said it hit the target. He said details on the results were not immediately known. The goal in this first-of-its-kind mission for the Navy was not just to hit the satellite but to obliterate a tank aboard the spacecraft carrying 1,000 pounds of a toxic fuel called hydrazine. U.S. officials have said the fuel would pose a potential health hazard to humans if it landed in a populated area. Although the odds of that were small even if the Pentagon had chosen not to try to shoot down the satellite, it was determined that it was worth trying to eliminate even that small chance. Officials said it might take a day or longer to know for sure if the toxic fuel was blown up. The government has organized hazardous materials teams to be flown to the site of any dangerous or otherwise sensitive debris that might land in the U.S. or elsewhere. The operation was so extraordinary, with such intense international publicity and political ramifications, that Defense Secretary Robert Gates -- not a military commander -- made the final decision to pull the trigger. The U.S. government organized hazardous materials teams, under the code name "Burnt Frost," to be flown to the site of any dangerous or otherwise sensitive debris that might land in the United States or elsewhere. High seas in the north Pacific had threatened to postpone the launch as the USS Lake Erie prepared a three-stage missile. Beyond a certain point, rough seas can interfere with the cruiser's launch procedures. The NAvy launched a SM-3 missile 130 miles to just beyond the edge of the Earth's atmosphere in an attempt to speed its non-explosive warhead directly into the satellite. Early in the day, a senior military officer said it did not look as if the weather would be good enough. That was shortly after the space shuttle Atlantis landed, removing the last safety issue for the military to begin determining the best moment for launch. The aim was not just to hit the bus-sized satellite -- which would burn up upon re-entering the atmosphere anyway -- but to obliterate a tank onboard that is carrying 1,000 pounds of hydrazine, a toxic fuel. The fuel, unused because the satellite died shortly after reaching orbit in December 2006 -- could be hazardous if it landed in a populated area. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a health bulletin saying that the health risk from satellite debris was considered to be low. "However, CDC is encouraging health officials and clinicians to review information about the health effects related to hydrazine to prepare in case their communities are affected by satellite debris." In a routine precaution, notifications have been issued worldwide to mariners and aviators to stay clear of an area in the Pacific where the satellite debris might fall. The military has calculated that the risk to aviation is so low that U.S. and international aviation officials decided not to reroute air traffic, a senior military officer said Wednesday. The shootdown, which was approved by President George W. Bush, is seen by some as blurring the lines between defending against a hostile long- range missile and targeting satellites in orbit. Much of the equipment used in the satellite shootdown was part of the Pentagon's missile defense system, a far-flung network of interceptors, radars and communications systems designed primarily to hit an incoming hostile ballistic missile fired at the United States by North Korea. The equipment, including the Navy missile, has never been used against a satellite or other such target. The three-stage Navy missile has chalked up a high rate of success in tests since 2002 -- in each case targeting a short- or medium-range missile. A hurry-up program to adapt the missile for this anti- satellite mission was completed in a matter of weeks; Navy officials say the changes will be reversed once this satellite is down. Left alone, the satellite would have been expected to hit Earth during the first week of March. About half of the 5,000-pound spacecraft would be expected to survive its blazing descent through the atmosphere and would scatter debris over several hundred miles. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:46:49 -0800 (PST), William Hung
wrote: WASHINGTON - A missile launched from a Navy ship successfully struck a dying U.S. spy satellite passing 130 miles over the Pacific on Wednesday, a defense official said. Dying? That sucker was deat a week after they launched it. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 21, 10:34*pm, Roger wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:46:49 -0800 (PST), William Hung wrote: WASHINGTON - A missile launched from a Navy ship successfully struck a dying U.S. spy satellite passing 130 miles over the Pacific on Wednesday, a defense official said. Dying? *That sucker was deat a week after they launched it. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)www.rogerhalstead.com Just saw the footage this morning on FOX. Pretty cool shot or was that file footage of some a Patriot vs Scud over Bagdad? lol Wil |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-02-20 04:35:34 -0800, Denny said:
I have a bad feeling about the military's intent to publically take a shot at it... dumb, dumb, dumb, and dumber - and likely to fail... So, here we go again, the laughing stock of the world... Also, totally unnecessary as the heat of reentry will set off the 'toxic' hypergolic fuel leaving nothing but scrap metal to impact... So, the desire to destroy HAS to be based in other reasons... At least the chinese were smart enough to take their shots in secret and only announce AFTER they hit it... But not our gov't and pentagon, nope, no waay, shoot their mouths off ahead of time so we can look really stupid... denny No, you are speaking only for yourself... -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS PRN NOTAM | Ali Ghorashi | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | February 4th 05 07:40 AM |
NOTAM | C J Campbell | Piloting | 87 | October 15th 04 06:03 PM |
What does "ORIG." mean in this NOTAM? | Dan Luke | Piloting | 2 | May 24th 04 03:35 PM |
MRB DP NOTAM | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | March 11th 04 05:19 PM |
AF/D's and NOTAM | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | January 19th 04 09:19 PM |