If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
and so it continues - proposed rule on renewing aircraft registration
new proposed rule in today's federal register
(watch the linewrap) http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...s.gpo.gov/2008 /E8-3822.htm It would appear that the FAA wants to make the aircraft registration certificate invalid if the registration hasn't been properly renewed in the last three years. And, of course, they want to charge a "fairer" cost for this "service." -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
and so it continues - proposed rule on renewing aircraft registration
Bob Noel wrote in
: (watch the linewrap) http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...cket.access.gp o.gov/2008 /E8-3822.htm Better yet: http://tinyurl.com/334pu6 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
and so it continues - proposed rule on renewing aircraftregistration
On Feb 28, 4:32*am, Bob Noel
wrote: new proposed rule in today's federal register (watch the linewrap) http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...edocket.access.... It would appear that the FAA wants to make the aircraft registration certificate invalid if the registration hasn't been properly renewed in the last three years. And, of course, they want to charge a "fairer" cost for this "service." -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) The next step will probably be a SMOG test. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
and so it continues - proposed rule on renewing aircraft registration
"Bob Noel" wrote new proposed rule in today's federal register It would appear that the FAA wants to make the aircraft registration certificate invalid if the registration hasn't been properly renewed in the last three years. And, of course, they want to charge a "fairer" cost for this "service." What a continuing crock of crap, driven by the "feel good" people in the gubermint. It reminds me of the trend for tighter gun control laws, and the gauntlet that law abiding citizens must run to purchase and own guns. The problem is that when nobody is allowed to have guns, only the criminals will have guns, and they will be unregistered, I guarantee. (please don't take this thread down the gun control direction; it was only used as a comparison) Same result with the attempt to get all airplane registrations current, so they will know who the terrorists and drug smugglers are, and what they are flying. Do they really think that the people trying to dodge the law will not be able to find a way to fly without current registration? Give me a break, or a brake, or something! And what's the deal with "five thousand" pages of legaleeze to publish a simple concept? I guess they think people will not bother to wade through it, to see what it is really about. -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
and so it continues - proposed rule on renewing aircraftregistration
On Feb 28, 2:54*pm, "Morgans" wrote:
"Bob Noel" wrote new proposed rule in today's federal register It would appear that the FAA wants to make the aircraft registration certificate invalid if the registration hasn't been properly renewed in the last three years. And, of course, they want to charge a "fairer" cost for this "service." *What a continuing crock of crap, driven by the "feel good" people in the gubermint. I'm sitting here watching Dr. Zhivago again. Remember that the Communist Party in Russia was started by people who wanted to do good and the best for everyone (doing the whole Robin Hood thing). Good intentitions are clearly not sufficient. -robert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
and so it continues - proposed rule on renewing aircraftregistration
I'm sitting here watching Dr. Zhivago again. Remember that the Communist Party in Russia was started by people who wanted to do good and the best for everyone (doing the whole Robin Hood thing). Good intentitions are clearly not sufficient. -robert Unfortunately, historical fact do not bear out that hollywood fantasy... Lenin, Trostky, et. al., caused and led a civil war that killed and/or starved millions - including murdering the Romanovs right down to helpless children - so they could be in power, and Stalin was a thug who murdered his way to power, and then murdered tens of millions of Russians to keep that power ... Good intentions were never an issue... denny |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
and so it continues - proposed rule on renewing aircraftregistration
On Feb 29, 4:32*am, Denny wrote:
I'm sitting here watching Dr. Zhivago again. Remember that the Communist Party in Russia was started by people who wanted to do good and the best for everyone (doing the whole Robin Hood thing). Good intentitions are clearly not sufficient. -robert Unfortunately, historical fact do not bear out that hollywood fantasy... Lenin, Trostky, et. al., caused and led a civil war that killed and/or starved millions - including murdering the Romanovs right down to helpless children - so they could be in power, and Stalin was a thug who murdered his way to power, and then murdered tens of millions of Russians to keep that power ... *Good intentions were never an issue... Absolute power always corrupts but millions of Russians didn't support the reds because they wanted Trostky to be powerful. They honestly believed in the left-wing agenda, that society should elevate the poorest on the backs of the richest and that taking property is ok in the name of the good of the masses. Those intentions were good and those people didn't know any better. I'm not sure what today's left- wingers excuse is though (perhaps they missed history). -Robert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
and so it continues - proposed rule on renewing aircraft registration
"John Godwin" wrote in message ... Bob Noel wrote in : (watch the linewrap) http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...cket.access.gp o.gov/2008 /E8-3822.htm Better yet: http://tinyurl.com/334pu6 WOW...amazing the problems a bureaucracy can breed... Tasty tidbits... With almost one-third of the aircraft on the register having a questionable registration status, it is clear that the needed accuracy and currency of aircraft registration data cannot be met with the present system of indefinite-duration Certificates that relies primarily on aircraft owners to report address changes, aircraft sales, aircraft destruction, or loss of registration eligibility. The FAA believes that limiting the duration of a Certificate would be the most effective method of increasing the accuracy of its records. Thus, the FAA, seeking to meet current and future needs, proposes in this NPRM: ..... Under 14 CFR 47.17, we currently charge $5.00 for obtaining a certificate of aircraft registration and would charge the same amount for a renewal registration under this proposal. However, the FAA is pursuing fairer, more cost-based funding for the future. One of the FAA's goals for its pending reauthorization is to match FAA funding more closely with the costs of providing services. Current FAA funding does not align with FAA's costs to provide services, and the current aircraft registration fee, which has been $5.00 since the mid-1960's, is an example of this disconnect. To move the FAA to a more cost-based organization, the Administration's proposal for FAA reauthorization, sent to Congress in February 2007, includes language that addresses registration and certification fees across the board. The House of Representatives adopted much of the Administration's proposal for these fees in H.R. 2881, which passed the House in September 2007. Once the outcome of the reauthorization legislation is known, the FAA will decide whether additional action is necessary through either further legislation or rulemaking. ..... Presently about 35% of registered aircraft are operating on potentially ineffective registrations, because the Registry has not been notified of registration changes. With the implementation of the proposed 3-year renewal, according to the analysis provided in the preliminary Regulatory Evaluation (a copy of which has been placed in the docket for this rulemaking), we estimate that the inaccuracy rate would drop to about 5.6% of the 240,000 aircraft expected to remain on the register. By comparison, a 5-year renewal interval would likely result in an error rate of about 12.5%, and a 7-year renewal interval would result in an error rate of about 21.8%. Even under the 3-year renewal interval, avoiding data degradation due to registration information changes would depend upon aircraft owners reporting all changes in a timely manner. .... The FAA recommends application be made at least 45 days before the end of the 3-month period. This scheduling, as shown by these sample dates, is necessary to manage the Registry's workload during the re-registration period. .... There are currently about 17,000 aircraft (out of over 340,000) whose status is ``sale reported.'' Of these, about 15,900 have been in the ``sale reported'' category for more than 6 months, according to the preliminary Regulatory Evaluation. In these cases, FAA has received notice of a sale from the last registered owner, but no Application has been filed, and the aircraft has not been registered to the new owner. Historically, there have been approximately 17,000 ``sale reported'' aircraft at any given time. Many of the aircraft that were originally placed in this short-term category have remained there for more than two decades. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
and so it continues - proposed rule on renewing aircraft registration
Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose...
They honestly believed in the left-wing agenda, that society should elevate the poorest on the backs of the richest and that taking property is ok in the name of the good of the masses. Those intentions were good and those people didn't know any better. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
and so it continues - proposed rule on renewing aircraft registration
"Blueskies" wrote in message ... "John Godwin" wrote in message ... Bob Noel wrote in : (watch the linewrap) http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...cket.access.gp o.gov/2008 /E8-3822.htm Better yet: http://tinyurl.com/334pu6 WOW...amazing the problems a bureaucracy can breed... We have so many 'laws' and 'regulations' in this US of A, many are non-enforceable and selectively enforced. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SSA Final Proposed Rule Changes and Site Selection Info Posted | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 0 | February 16th 05 12:42 AM |
TSA rule - registration of freelance instructors | David Brooks | Piloting | 16 | October 12th 04 06:19 PM |
FAA has temporarily withdrawn the proposed Sport Pilot rule | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 2 | March 27th 04 06:23 AM |
Proposed new flightseeing rule | C J Campbell | Piloting | 8 | November 15th 03 02:03 PM |
Proposed new flightseeing rule | C J Campbell | Home Built | 56 | November 10th 03 05:40 PM |