![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 14:56 12 June 2008, 5Z wrote:
OK, I'm sure some of you are jesting, but here's what *might* have happened: Pilot is soaring over remote Utah with some reasonably safe looking dry lakes, pastures, whatever below. Runs out of lift and decides it's time to start the engine while within easy range of one of these landing options. The engine fails to start, the location is extremely remote, so pilot makes a MAYDAY call while still in the landing pattern to ensure someone will come get him if problems arise. If he had a transponder or SPOT, he might activate these before landing, again in case something bad happens. When I fly my ASH-26E, I'm always planning to land it somewhere safely, but it's a welcome relief when the engine starts. It's just plain stupid to not be preparing to land as one is starting the engine - just in case. So if you were flying a pure glider, and facing the prospect of landing in a remote, but reasonably safe looking dry lake, pasture, whatever, would you send out a Mayday message before even landing? Jim Beckman |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 12, 7:56*am, 5Z wrote:
OK, I'm sure some of you are jesting, but here's what *might* have happened... I think we can be fairly sure he wasn't tightening the iris on his camera after a console lockup. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Jun, 15:56, 5Z wrote:
Pilot is soaring over remote Utah with some reasonably safe looking dry lakes, pastures, whatever below. Runs out of lift and decides it's time to start the engine while within easy range of one of these landing options. The engine fails to start, the location is extremely remote, so pilot makes a MAYDAY call while still in the landing pattern to ensure someone will come get him if problems arise. That would be a gross misuse - an abuse - of the MAYDAY call. You are NOT supposed to use it on the off chance that something might go wrong later. Ian |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Jun., 10:33, Ian wrote:
On 12 Jun, 15:56, 5Z wrote: Pilot is soaring over remote Utah with some reasonably safe looking dry lakes, pastures, whatever below. *Runs out of lift and decides it's time to start the engine while within easy range of one of these landing options. *The engine fails to start, the location is extremely remote, so pilot makes a MAYDAY call while still in the landing pattern to ensure someone will come get him if problems arise. That would be a gross misuse - an abuse - of the MAYDAY call. You are NOT supposed to use it on the off chance that something might go wrong later. Ian On the discussion Pan-Pan vs. Mayday: As I learned it (and is content of German PPL exams), Mayday means declaring an emergency for your OWN plane, whereas Pan-Pan means you noticed an emergency on someone else. An engine failure on your plane would in this sense be a Mayday, an observed car crash or a broken glider on the ground would be a Pan- Pan. Somehow I get confused because Wikipedia states it different: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-pan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayday_(distress_signal) They refer to the lower/higher order of the emergency situation. Can anyone clarify that? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 10:20 19 June 2008, Jonas Eberle wrote:
On 19 Jun., 10:33, Ian wrote: On 12 Jun, 15:56, 5Z wrote: Pilot is soaring over remote Utah with some reasonably safe looking dry lakes, pastures, whatever below. =A0Runs out of lift and decides it's time to start the engine while within easy range of one of these landing options. =A0The engine fails to start, the location is extremel= y remote, so pilot makes a MAYDAY call while still in the landing pattern to ensure someone will come get him if problems arise. That would be a gross misuse - an abuse - of the MAYDAY call. You are NOT supposed to use it on the off chance that something might go wrong later. Ian On the discussion Pan-Pan vs. Mayday: As I learned it (and is content of German PPL exams), Mayday means declaring an emergency for your OWN plane, whereas Pan-Pan means you noticed an emergency on someone else. An engine failure on your plane would in this sense be a Mayday, an observed car crash or a broken glider on the ground would be a Pan- Pan. Somehow I get confused because Wikipedia states it different: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-pan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayday_(distress_signal) They refer to the lower/higher order of the emergency situation. Can anyone clarify that? MAYDAY means emergency while PAN PAN means Possible Assistance Needed. John. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Jun, 11:20, Jonas Eberle wrote:
Somehow I get confused because Wikipedia states it different:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-pan...istress_signal) They refer to the lower/higher order of the emergency situation. Can anyone clarify that? Mayday originally meant "grave and imminent danger to vessel (or aircraft)". It doesn't have to be your own: if you see a ship sinking or a glider lose a wing then you are perfectly justified in calling Mayday. It did not - the last time I checked, and when I was examined in such things by a Marconi man - mean "grave and imminent danger to a person". Various authorities - starting, I think, with the Royal Yachting Association in the UK - have tried to extend the meaning de facto, but as far as I am aware it's not official. Theoretically, therefore, you could be in trouble for calling Mayday for a man overboard. However, I doubt if anyone would prosecute in practixe, and if my crew fell overboard I'd call any damn thing I thought would help and deal with the consequences later. To return to the distinction, Pan Pan means "this is nasty, but nothing is on the point of sinking or crashing and "Securite securite means "look out, folks". Calling Mayday causes all sorts of things to happen. Everybody else will stop transmitting (even pan pans). Every available receiver will be tuned in to you. Recorders will start running. People will be called in from rest periods. Air crews will warm up helicopters. Huge amounts of money will be spent. It is absolutely, grossly, terribly irresponsible to use it for anything other than dreadful emergency. "I might screw up this landing so I'd better ask for help just in case" is NOT a dreadful emergency. Ian |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonas Eberle wrote:
On 19 Jun., 10:33, Ian wrote: On 12 Jun, 15:56, 5Z wrote: Pilot is soaring over remote Utah with some reasonably safe looking dry lakes, pastures, whatever below. Runs out of lift and decides it's time to start the engine while within easy range of one of these landing options. The engine fails to start, the location is extremely remote, so pilot makes a MAYDAY call while still in the landing pattern to ensure someone will come get him if problems arise. That would be a gross misuse - an abuse - of the MAYDAY call. You are NOT supposed to use it on the off chance that something might go wrong later. Ian On the discussion Pan-Pan vs. Mayday: As I learned it (and is content of German PPL exams), Mayday means declaring an emergency for your OWN plane, whereas Pan-Pan means you noticed an emergency on someone else. An engine failure on your plane would in this sense be a Mayday, an observed car crash or a broken glider on the ground would be a Pan- Pan. Somehow I get confused because Wikipedia states it different: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-pan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayday_(distress_signal) They refer to the lower/higher order of the emergency situation. Can anyone clarify that? Here is text regarding marine VHF use of mayday and pan pan. I recall learning the same for aircraft use as well (USA)... 7. Emergency signals: * "MAYDAY": this distress signal is to be used only when threat of grave and iminent danger exists; requests immediate assistance. “MAYDAY” has priority over all other messages. * "PAN PAN": this urgency signal is to be used when the safety of vessel or person(s) is in jeopardy. (From website: http://www.co.escambia.fl.us/departm...Procedures.php ) Scott |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 19, 2:33*am, Ian wrote:
That would be a gross misuse - an abuse - of the MAYDAY call. You are NOT supposed to use it on the off chance that something might go wrong later. You're in a remote area, you're high enough to make a radio call, but don't know how much lower you can be and still communicate, so you want to notify *someone* of your predicament. So you tune 121.5 and say...???? -Tom |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5Z wrote:
You're in a remote area, you're high enough to make a radio call, but don't know how much lower you can be and still communicate, so you want to notify *someone* of your predicament. So you tune 121.5 and say...???? PAN PAN in Europe, which would have the desired effect. I've heard this is not fully recognised in the US - true or not? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Tom
This is RAS - so the advice is only guaranteed to be worth every cent you pay, but here is my opinion for what it is worth. I believe the adage is Aviate, navigate, communicate (My corollary is - and know the consequences.) Having aviated into a hazardous situation - however we got there, the thing to do is to fly the aeroplane, to as safe a location as possible under the circumstances (minimise the risk of damage and injury), and communicate the situation (location and risk of damage or injury) as clearly as possible. Part of mitigating risk to yourself and others is to ensure the people at your home airfield and or SAR know where you are, and what your intentions are. The cost and risks associated with a large scale search when there is limited information available is much higher. So - You're in a remote area, you're high enough to make a radio call, but don't know how much lower you can be and still communicate, so you want to notify *someone* of your predicament. So you tune 121.5 and say...???? My call is - PAN PAN "... I have the following situation." But my understanding is that the controllers / SAR / contest directors would like to know the situation whatever you call it- as long as you explain the situation. If you mistakenly use "Mayday", the person you are talking to "should" ask if you really want to declare an emergency. Then remember to tell the same people once you are down what the new (hopefully - "no problem") situation is. Even in remote areas you may be able to relay via an airliner - who should be listening for your call if you made a PAN announcement. If they don't hear from you cancelling the PAN (Possible Assistance Needed )call all the expensive stuff will start on the assumption that it is no longer a possible, but an actual "assistance needed" situation - but you won't be on the hook for futile expenses. I you cry wolf - You will, of course, aggravate a lot of people you might really want on your side in a real emergency. And they will bill you. Communicating anything can save a lot of aggravation - Consider the contest pilot who got too busy to call landing out in the middle of nowhere on a contest day that developed massive storm fronts. Last contact on the radio was around two hours before eventual landing. That is a lot of ground for a modern 18m ship. On the ground , he had no cell reception, deserted farmhouses and too little radio range (flat battery) to reach anyone. Having lost track of exactly where he was in the excitement he was unaware/unsure of how to reach the nearest town which was 13km away. Out of options and ideas he slept uncomfortably in the cockpit while the storm blew itself out - which is more than can be said for a lot of others who spent much of the night up and arranging a search at dawn. Then seven aircraft started a grid search, with most burning two hours of tach time by the time the aircraft was located, and they got back home. Then the issue of cost comes up... The take away from that one for me was - have decent battery endurance available, and try to have two cellular phones so that you may be able to get alternative comms working. The field we found him in had reasonable cellular coverage by the alternative network, not his service provider. Could/should have been a simple retrieve. Sometimes abuse is preferable to non-use. 5Z wrote: On Jun 19, 2:33 am, Ian wrote: That would be a gross misuse - an abuse - of the MAYDAY call. You are NOT supposed to use it on the off chance that something might go wrong later. You're in a remote area, you're high enough to make a radio call, but don't know how much lower you can be and still communicate, so you want to notify *someone* of your predicament. So you tune 121.5 and say...???? -Tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sparrowhawk 300 km in Utah | Mike the Strike | Soaring | 8 | May 6th 07 03:33 AM |
MAYDAY in the Everglades | Marty from Sunny Florida | Owning | 46 | May 16th 05 10:01 PM |
Utah Bush Flying | O-Usagi | Piloting | 3 | March 22nd 04 04:24 PM |
Region 9 - Parowan Utah | Dirk Elber | Soaring | 0 | February 9th 04 12:54 AM |
St George Utah | Casey Wilson | Piloting | 6 | August 9th 03 04:17 AM |