![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 7:52*pm, ContestID67 wrote:
Some comments; 1) Crimping is very much the way to go. *The heat of soldering (unless you are very careful) can easily damage the dielectric insulator. Invariably you are then left with a blob of solder that must be wittled away to make thing fit. *Ugh. 2) The less expensive sub-$50 (but not dirt cheap) crimpers seem to work fine. *Ratcheting type is highly recommended as they enforce the correct amount of pressure. *The $200 units are made to hold up to repeated use over years, something most of us are unlikely to need. 3) Male/Female versus Two Males with coupler (whoa!) - Stick with the fewest possible connections. *Not only for the fact that there are fewer things to go wrong but because each extra connection looses 2db (rule of thumb) of your power. 4) While the boom is open, think about (if possible/practical/useful) pulling extra air lines, coax, etc. 5) Test, test, test, test and test again before buttoning this up. Get a professional to help out. *Well worth the expense. *Much better now than later. 6) If you are on the scene of a boom break (I have), resisting with all your might the temptation of cutting all the lines (air, coax) to speed up the removal of the dead beast from the scene of the crime. It is much better to try to take the time to disconnect things at the cockpit end and pull them back so that any necessary splicing is done in a easily accessible place. Enjoy, John DeRosa I'd raise that price limit a bit, the $50 crimpers I've seen will not be able to crimp tight enough to achieve a proper connection. Will it work most of the time. Sure. But I'd not want them in my aircraft. The ratcheting type crimpers have enough jaw pressure to properly crimp the wires (collapses a large % of the voids in the wire bundles, creates cold welds). The ratchet makes sure you crimp it all the way. And since many come with interchangeable dies once you need to crimp more than one type of connector the total cost is not too bad. The high end crimpers also have properly shaped hardened and polished steel jaws that will crimp with high pressure without deforming the connector. BTW I like the Ideal Crimpmaster because they are reasonably priced ~ $50 for the bare handle with die sets ~$30-$40 each. Crimpmaster handles and and a few dies are available at Home Depot etc. A great web site with good selection of dies is http://www.mytoolstore.com/ideal/ide08-11.html 3M, Amp and Anderson also make great high end ratcheting crimp tools for their line of crimp connectors. These are often ~$200-$300, feature heavier duty construction, fine tuning of crimp pressure, etc. Some crimp on connectors are more sensitive to others about using the right crimp tool, e.g. some fully insulated spade/ring connectors and Anderson PowerPole connectors. Not that I think JJ was really posting to ask for any advice, ... but I'd also not use a coupler. I'd just go inline M-BNC to F-BNC connectors. It is never too late to cut the tail off again and do it properly :-) Make sure they have gold plated pins for corrosion resistance. I'd also put a sleeve of heat shrink over the connectors to keep everything sealed from humidity/moisture etc. Some of the very high-shrink type that fit over the connectors but shrink to the coax. Darryl |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 25, 11:38*am, Darryl Ramm wrote:
Make sure they have gold plated pins for corrosion resistance. I'd also put a sleeve of heat shrink over the connectors to keep everything sealed from humidity/moisture etc. Some of the very high-shrink type that fit over the connectors but shrink to the coax. Darryl - Good idea to use gold plated pins for corrosion resistance. However, I am unsure if I would put the heat shrink over the connectors. While it might keep dust and dirt out, it will also serve to keep any condensation inside and not allow evaporation, in effect accelerating corrosion. Instead, I use a dielectric compound like Dow Corning #4 (http:// www.skygeek.com/dc4.html). It keeps the moisture out, prevents corrosion and doesn't dry up. It is also especially good on trailer light connectors. My $0.02. - John "67" DeRosa PS - If you must use heat shrink, avoid the cheap Radio Shack stuff like the plague. It doesn't shrink enough and becomes very stiff. Find a source for good quality heat shrink and be willing to pay $2-$4 per 3 foot piece. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 26, 10:40*pm, ContestID67 wrote:
On Jun 25, 11:38*am, Darryl Ramm wrote: Make sure they have gold plated pins for corrosion resistance. I'd also put a sleeve of heat shrink over the connectors to keep everything sealed from humidity/moisture etc. Some of the very high-shrink type that fit over the connectors but shrink to the coax. Darryl - Good idea to use gold plated pins for corrosion resistance. However, I am unsure if I would put the heat shrink over the connectors. *While it might keep dust and dirt out, it will also serve to keep any condensation inside and not allow evaporation, in effect accelerating corrosion. Instead, I use a dielectric compound like Dow Corning #4 (http://www.skygeek.com/dc4.html). It keeps the moisture out, prevents corrosion and doesn't dry up. *It is also especially good on trailer light connectors. My $0.02. - John "67" DeRosa PS - If you must use heat shrink, avoid the cheap Radio Shack stuff like the plague. *It doesn't shrink enough and becomes very stiff. *Find a source for good quality heat shrink and be willing to pay $2-$4 per 3 foot piece. To add one more penny's worth: If the connection is a straight section that won't need flexibility, the dielectric compound for the internals of the connector, then the high end heat shrink tubing with the sealer/adhesive coating inside is the cat's meow. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"3) Male/Female versus Two Males with coupler (whoa!) - Stick with the
fewest possible connections. Not only for the fact that there are fewer things to go wrong but because each extra connection looses 2db (rule of thumb) of your power." Comment: While I am not an authority on connector loss, my opinion is that the estimated 2 db loss per connector is high. I have built an EME (Earth - Moon - Earth) communicatons system where an extra .1 db loss is the difference between success and failure and carefully monitored losses. It is easy to measure the loss in connectors and it is rare that 2 db is lost on the relatively low frequency of 123 MHz. I think the norm is .1 to .2 db per BNC connector. However, I had a box of short BNC jumper cables (commercially made) and about one in 10 had a 2 db loss. I have never determined why and simply discarded the high loss jumpers. I checked a number of source books to see if I could find any defninitive statement about "average" loss per connector at a certain frequency, and could not find any. The type of BNC connectors that are assembled by screwing together are much more likely to have high losses than a properly crimped connector. Colin Lamb |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 25, 7:56*am, "COLIN LAMB" wrote:
"3) Male/Female versus Two Males with coupler (whoa!) - Stick with the fewest possible connections. *Not only for the fact that there are fewer things to go wrong but because each extra connection looses 2db (rule of thumb) of your power." Comment: While I am not an authority on connector loss, my opinion is that the estimated 2 db loss per connector is high. *I have built an EME (Earth - Moon - Earth) communicatons system where an extra .1 db loss is the difference between success and failure and carefully monitored losses. *It is easy to measure the loss in connectors and it is rare that 2 db is lost on the relatively low frequency of 123 MHz. *I think the norm is .1 to ..2 db per BNC connector. *However, I had a box of short BNC jumper cables (commercially made) and about one in 10 had a 2 db loss. *I have never determined why and simply discarded the high loss jumpers. I checked a number of source books to see if I could find any defninitive statement about "average" loss per connector at a certain frequency, and could not find any. The type of BNC connectors that are assembled by screwing together are much more likely to have high losses than a properly crimped connector. Colin Lamb Colin, he was making a JOKE about various Male/Female ratios etc. I work instrumentation on military aircraft. Mil spec connectors, crimpers, etc. Done correctly, soldered connectors and crimped connectors are equally good. Done badly, neither is worth the trouble they'll cause. That said, it is EASIER to assemble a soldered connector BADLY, so crimping (with GOOD tools) would be my choice if I actually GOT a choice. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 7:52*pm, ContestID67 wrote:
6) If you are on the scene of a boom break (I have), resisting with all your might the temptation of cutting all the lines (air, coax) to speed up the removal of the dead beast from the scene of the crime. It is much better to try to take the time to disconnect things at the cockpit end and pull them back so that any necessary splicing is done in a easily accessible place. I too helped to retrieve a glider with a boom break. We splinted the boom with trailer jack handles and lots of duct tape and put the fuselage in the trailer in one piece. (Thanks to PC2 who had been there, and done that, before.) Andy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You make a very good point, the beast may be broken but it isn't
terminal if you use a little common sense getting it apart and back in the box. I have seen a G-103 where the club members used a crow-bar to get the wings off because the aft lift fitting carry-through tube was bent and wouldn't release the wings. Bad way to go, the ship was repairable before the club got there. I also have seen a Cirrus push- rods cut with a hack-saw, right next to the Hotiellier rfittings. Use a little common sense, the bird still has value. BTW, prop up the fin and the radio may just work to get a message out. The Nimbus 3 that was missing for 3 days at Uvalde had a good radio, battery and antenna. All the pilot had to do was prop up the fin and talk to all the folks that were looking for him. JJ Andy wrote: On Jun 24, 7:52�pm, ContestID67 wrote: 6) If you are on the scene of a boom break (I have), resisting with all your might the temptation of cutting all the lines (air, coax) to speed up the removal of the dead beast from the scene of the crime. It is much better to try to take the time to disconnect things at the cockpit end and pull them back so that any necessary splicing is done in a easily accessible place. I too helped to retrieve a glider with a boom break. We splinted the boom with trailer jack handles and lots of duct tape and put the fuselage in the trailer in one piece. (Thanks to PC2 who had been there, and done that, before.) Andy |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WX-950 installation | Kyprianos Biris | Owning | 5 | October 23rd 07 01:37 PM |
US ELT Installation | mhr | Soaring | 57 | December 31st 05 07:39 PM |
installation xcsoar | junior | Soaring | 0 | February 23rd 04 11:50 AM |
2-33 battery installation | Kurt | Soaring | 2 | January 27th 04 01:36 PM |
EGT installation | Andre | Home Built | 4 | August 27th 03 08:33 AM |