![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David E. Powell" wrote in message ... Outspend em again? That will probably never happen again. Russia is quickly becoming an important oil exporter. Vaughn |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Outspend em again
in general, term "expensive" does not mean the best one we already have had G5 thing to try long time ago see, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6R2lm2QzCp8 Kind russian regards, Yuri www.testpilots.ru |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 18, 4:50 pm, wrote:
Outspend em again in general, term "expensive" does not mean the best one we already have had G5 thing to try long time ago see,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6R2lm2QzCp8 Kind russian regards, Yuri www.testpilots.ru Although I can respect the impressive engineering in the MiG 1.42, Su 27/37 series, S.47 I can not take them seriously as 5th generation fighters. They are barely 4th generation aircraft. They are barely and improvement over the F-15. The Americans have with the F22 produced an air superiority fighter that is vastly superior to anything else in the world whether that be French, European or CIS or Russian. By vastly superior I mean that the kill ratio will be in favour of the F-22 by a very large margin. This is easy to understand, the F-22 will detect any opposing aircraft first, it will then be able to fire a missile first and destroy the it enemy in large numbers. Modern missiles are quite reliable. The Russian officers and engineers who set out to produce the MiG 1.42 and S.47 and Su 37 set out to produce an aircraft better than the 35 year old F-15. They succeeded in producing a slightly better aircraft in some areas. The USAF strategists and engineers who created the F-22 produced a completely new concept that makes irrelevant these old ideas. What the Mikoyan and Sukhoi have succeeded in producing are aircraft that have the same thrust to weight ratio as the F-15 and the same armament levels but better instantaneous turn rates due to more complicated aerodynamics, possibly they have smaller radar signatures but only by a small amount (a reduction by a factor of 10 is insignificant). These so called 5th generation aircraft are only slightly better than the 35 year old F-15. When the F-15 is upgraded with modern radar (eg AESA) and missiles there is little better about the new Soviet fighters except better dog fighting though there climb rates and acceleration is likely to be little better. I understand that the Russian or CIS short range missiles have evolved exceptional maneuverability. The F-22 is designed to destroy its opponents well before a dogfight can occur. I'm sure if a dogfight does occur the F-22 with its truly exceptional thrust to weight ratio and very high cruise speed will do very well. In seeking to produce their own stealth fighters the Russian air force has acknowledged this. Attempts to produce stealth defeating radars based in impulses or bi static principles will loose much of their effectiveness in the presence of simple noise jamming. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Russian fighter...wow! | Ricky | Piloting | 25 | March 21st 08 01:42 AM |
New Russian Fighter? | [email protected] | Piloting | 9 | March 15th 08 01:13 PM |
What is a nth Generation fighter? | Tom Nealon | Military Aviation | 64 | December 17th 03 10:18 PM |
Russian Fighter Book | Charles Talleyrand | Military Aviation | 11 | September 13th 03 08:21 PM |
Joint Russian-French 5th generation fighter? | lihakirves | Military Aviation | 1 | July 5th 03 01:36 AM |