Detained at the whim of the president

From:
Date: 12/15/2003 7:48 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In rec.food.cooking Jarg wrote:
Hhahahahahah "Texas Tard" Hahahahahah Did you think that one up yourself?

Interesting how the left's true believers are incapable of coherent debate,
and must resort to personal insult. I bet Bush is significantly brighter
than most of these people.

A personal insult? It is a matter of historical fact that Bush said
the world would be a better place if he was dictator. That's not
an insult, its a simple fact.


Please cite a verifiable source.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

B2431 wrote:
From:
Date: 12/15/2003 7:48 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In rec.food.cooking Jarg wrote:
Hhahahahahah "Texas Tard" Hahahahahah Did you think that one up yourself?

Interesting how the left's true believers are incapable of coherent debate,
and must resort to personal insult. I bet Bush is significantly brighter
than most of these people.

A personal insult? It is a matter of historical fact that Bush said
the world would be a better place if he was dictator. That's not
an insult, its a simple fact.


Please cite a verifiable source.

Your wish is my command, courtesy of Google:



Newsday
Transition of Power: President-Elect Bush Meets With Congressional Leaders on
Capitol Hill
Aired December 18, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE
UPDATED.

FRANK SESNO, CNN ANCHOR: In the nation's capital, it's all about George W.
Bush -- he's here and doing business -- while in state capitals, it's the day
the Electoral College meets and votes. And if all goes as planned, the electors
will certify Bush's narrow victory in last month's election.

He's already looking forward as he makes the rounds here in the nation's
capital. A key item on his agenda today: meeting congressional leaders.

CNN's Chris Black joins us from Capitol Hill with more now -- Chris.

CHRIS BLACK, CNN CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENT: Frank, President- elect George W.
Bush came to Capitol Hill today for the first time since the election intending
to listen to congressional leaders, the bipartisan congressional leadership. But
he also made it clear to them, in more than two and a half hours of meetings,
that he intends to stand by his tax cut proposal and other planks in his
campaign agenda.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

GOV. GEORGE W. BUSH (R-TX), PRESIDENT-ELECT: I told all four that there were
going to be some times where we don't agree with each other. But that's OK. If
this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm
the dictator.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

George Z.





Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

From: "George Z. Bush" am
Date: 12/15/2003 5:57 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

B2431 wrote:
From:
Date: 12/15/2003 7:48 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In rec.food.cooking Jarg wrote:
Hhahahahahah "Texas Tard" Hahahahahah Did you think that one up
yourself?

Interesting how the left's true believers are incapable of coherent
debate,
and must resort to personal insult. I bet Bush is significantly brighter
than most of these people.

A personal insult? It is a matter of historical fact that Bush said
the world would be a better place if he was dictator. That's not
an insult, its a simple fact.


Please cite a verifiable source.

Your wish is my command, courtesy of Google:



Newsday
Transition of Power: President-Elect Bush Meets With Congressional Leaders on
Capitol Hill
Aired December 18, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE
UPDATED.

FRANK SESNO, CNN ANCHOR: In the nation's capital, it's all about George W.
Bush -- he's here and doing business -- while in state capitals, it's the day
the Electoral College meets and votes. And if all goes as planned, the
electors
will certify Bush's narrow victory in last month's election.

He's already looking forward as he makes the rounds here in the nation's
capital. A key item on his agenda today: meeting congressional leaders.

CNN's Chris Black joins us from Capitol Hill with more now -- Chris.

CHRIS BLACK, CNN CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENT: Frank, President- elect George
W.
Bush came to Capitol Hill today for the first time since the election
intending
to listen to congressional leaders, the bipartisan congressional leadership.
But
he also made it clear to them, in more than two and a half hours of meetings,
that he intends to stand by his tax cut proposal and other planks in his
campaign agenda.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

GOV. GEORGE W. BUSH (R-TX), PRESIDENT-ELECT: I told all four that there were
going to be some times where we don't agree with each other. But that's OK.
If
this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm
the dictator.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

George Z.


Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

Well, if you took that seriously you were probably the only one.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

Humor. Not meant to be taken literally. Surely you knew that?!

Jarg

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...
B2431 wrote:
From:
Date: 12/15/2003 7:48 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In rec.food.cooking Jarg wrote:
Hhahahahahah "Texas Tard" Hahahahahah Did you think that one up
yourself?

Interesting how the left's true believers are incapable of coherent
debate,
and must resort to personal insult. I bet Bush is significantly
brighter
than most of these people.

A personal insult? It is a matter of historical fact that Bush said
the world would be a better place if he was dictator. That's not
an insult, its a simple fact.


Please cite a verifiable source.

Your wish is my command, courtesy of Google:



Newsday
Transition of Power: President-Elect Bush Meets With Congressional Leaders
on
Capitol Hill
Aired December 18, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY
BE
UPDATED.

FRANK SESNO, CNN ANCHOR: In the nation's capital, it's all about George W.
Bush -- he's here and doing business -- while in state capitals, it's the
day
the Electoral College meets and votes. And if all goes as planned, the
electors
will certify Bush's narrow victory in last month's election.

He's already looking forward as he makes the rounds here in the nation's
capital. A key item on his agenda today: meeting congressional leaders.

CNN's Chris Black joins us from Capitol Hill with more now -- Chris.

CHRIS BLACK, CNN CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENT: Frank, President- elect
George W.
Bush came to Capitol Hill today for the first time since the election
intending
to listen to congressional leaders, the bipartisan congressional
leadership. But
he also made it clear to them, in more than two and a half hours of
meetings,
that he intends to stand by his tax cut proposal and other planks in his
campaign agenda.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

GOV. GEORGE W. BUSH (R-TX), PRESIDENT-ELECT: I told all four that there
were
going to be some times where we don't agree with each other. But that's
OK. If
this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as
I'm
the dictator.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

George Z.





Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

"Jarg" wrote in message
. com...
They can ask but they can't do anything about it because the United States
is there legally under the terms of the lease. And your rumour is just
that, a rumour. I'm sure the presence of US forces in Cuba irritates
Castro
(and his left wing buddies like you) to no end.

Jarg

Anyone that doesn't agree with you is left wing? What are you, some kind of
communist? The land belongs to Cuba, they can tell the US to get the ****
out whether we like it or not. Leases can be broken. Where is the U.S.
going to sue to perfect their "lease" in the Cuban courts? Here in the
U.S.?

I laugh at your nonsense. Just because a so called lease exists doesn't
mean the U.S. government can lay claim to the lands and tenements of another
country. Whether or not the Gitmo irritates Castro or not, the land still
belongs to Cuba and if they want to break the lease, they can. You seem to
be implying that U.S. law extends to Cuba, I assure you, it does not. If
the lease calls for payment in gold, and the U.S. sends a check, then they
are, and have been in breach of contract for years and rightfully, Cuba
could easily evict them and abandon the "lease".

My point was very clear, and you attempted to subvert it. Cuba LIKES the
fact that Gitmo is there, but you shouldn't be surprised that they don't put
that fact up on billboards!

No, I would imagine that people who disagree with me hold a variety of
polical views. But am I far off about you? I doubt it.

You may laugh all you want but the fact remains the US will continue to
enforce this lease and there isn't a thing Castro can do about it.

Jarg


"None" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Jarg" wrote in message
. com...
They can ask but they can't do anything about it because the United
States
is there legally under the terms of the lease. And your rumour is just
that, a rumour. I'm sure the presence of US forces in Cuba irritates
Castro
(and his left wing buddies like you) to no end.

Jarg

Anyone that doesn't agree with you is left wing? What are you, some kind
of
communist? The land belongs to Cuba, they can tell the US to get the ****
out whether we like it or not. Leases can be broken. Where is the U.S.
going to sue to perfect their "lease" in the Cuban courts? Here in the
U.S.?

I laugh at your nonsense. Just because a so called lease exists doesn't
mean the U.S. government can lay claim to the lands and tenements of
another
country. Whether or not the Gitmo irritates Castro or not, the land still
belongs to Cuba and if they want to break the lease, they can. You seem
to
be implying that U.S. law extends to Cuba, I assure you, it does not. If
the lease calls for payment in gold, and the U.S. sends a check, then they
are, and have been in breach of contract for years and rightfully, Cuba
could easily evict them and abandon the "lease".

My point was very clear, and you attempted to subvert it. Cuba LIKES the
fact that Gitmo is there, but you shouldn't be surprised that they don't
put
that fact up on billboards!

None wrote:


I laugh at your nonsense. Just because a so called lease exists doesn't
mean the U.S. government can lay claim to the lands and tenements of another
country. Whether or not the Gitmo irritates Castro or not, the land still
belongs to Cuba and if they want to break the lease, they can. You seem to
be implying that U.S. law extends to Cuba, I assure you, it does not. If
the lease calls for payment in gold, and the U.S. sends a check, then they
are, and have been in breach of contract for years and rightfully, Cuba
could easily evict them and abandon the "lease".


How, exactly could Cuba enforce that eviction notice?

RogerM wrote:



None wrote:


I laugh at your nonsense. Just because a so called lease exists doesn't
mean the U.S. government can lay claim to the lands and tenements of another
country. Whether or not the Gitmo irritates Castro or not, the land still
belongs to Cuba and if they want to break the lease, they can. You seem to
be implying that U.S. law extends to Cuba, I assure you, it does not. If
the lease calls for payment in gold, and the U.S. sends a check, then they
are, and have been in breach of contract for years and rightfully, Cuba
could easily evict them and abandon the "lease".


How, exactly could Cuba enforce that eviction notice?

They tried that before when they cut off Gitmo's water. The U.S. built
desalinization plants.

In article , RogerM
says...


None wrote:


I laugh at your nonsense. Just because a so called lease exists doesn't
mean the U.S. government can lay claim to the lands and tenements of another
country. Whether or not the Gitmo irritates Castro or not, the land still
belongs to Cuba and if they want to break the lease, they can. You seem to
be implying that U.S. law extends to Cuba, I assure you, it does not. If
the lease calls for payment in gold, and the U.S. sends a check, then they
are, and have been in breach of contract for years and rightfully, Cuba
could easily evict them and abandon the "lease".


How, exactly could Cuba enforce that eviction notice?

Stomp their feet and pout.



--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

"Pan Ohco" wrote in message
...

Oh, who flew the planes in to the twin towers?

Saudis, and don't you forget it!