![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mark Hansen" wrote in message ... If you reduce the weight of the prop, won't that move your CG aft? Requiring less weight in the tail (actually, anywhere behind the CG) to support the same flight envelope? (Let's see, how can I gracefully get out of this one...OK, I know...) Brain fart! Yes, you are 100% correct. We would need to saw off tail structure to fix the CG. (just kidding) Worst case, you would need to add weight as far forward as possible, and that added weight would have to be MORE than the weight that you saved by swapping the prop because it would necessarily need to be mounted closer to the CG than where the weight came off (the prop). Just to add a bit of noise to the discussion, an airplane operating at maximum allowed aft CG is actually more aerodynamically efficient. Sailplane pilots often add tail ballast for just this reason. -- Vaughn Nothing personal, but if you are posting through Google Groups I may not receive your message. Google refuses to control the flood of spam messages originating in their system, so on any given day I may or may not have Google blocked. Try a real NNTP server & news reader program and you will never go back. All you need is access to an NNTP server (AKA "news server") and a news reader program. You probably already have a news reader program in your computer (Hint: Outlook Express). Assuming that your Usenet needs are modest, use http://news.aioe.org/ for free and/or http://www.teranews.com/ for a one-time $3.95 setup fee. Will poofread for food. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually I think it was determined in the sailplane circles.. that having
the CG at the 85% point was the most efficient.. too far aft was too much and caused nose down stick putting the elevator down into the slip stream, and not far enough aft caused back stick or up elevator into the slip stream. Heavier pilots do add tail ballast which increases the minimum pilot weight for club gliders. BT Just to add a bit of noise to the discussion, an airplane operating at maximum allowed aft CG is actually more aerodynamically efficient. Sailplane pilots often add tail ballast for just this reason. -- Vaughn |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ground adjustable prop | [email protected] | Home Built | 1 | January 30th 05 07:15 AM |
| adjustable prop bearing | Joe | Home Built | 5 | October 23rd 04 01:00 PM |
| Cessna Prop Needed | Cy Galley | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 23rd 04 02:23 AM |
| Hydraulic CS prop converting to Adjustable prop? | Scott VanderVeen | Home Built | 0 | December 5th 03 06:54 PM |
| Adjustable prop experience? | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 0 | July 1st 03 05:07 AM |