![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Old thread but I'm enjoying the movie. I stood up after a 5:35 flight and was happy to walk away from the Pilatus. Was 54 at the time, but my wife and I were training for triathlons and in pretty good shape. Took 3 water bottles with me, poured the last over my head too.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 16:47 30 March 2016, Jonathan St. Cloud wrote:
Boy who flew with condors youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqHXiaMhSIo More on "Boy Who Flew with the Condors." On Chris Jury, yes, as mentioned, he flew and was the son of a TWA Captain. And yes, sadly lost in a powered aircraft accident. Never met either, although we were all circulating in the sport as youngsters about the same time...I was East Coast, they West. The movie was one of the reasons, as opinioned by Paul Schweizer, that helped the late sixties surge in the sport. Other two were the National Geographic article on the Reno 1966 Nationals, and Bob Buck's articles in Air Facts Magazine/Reader's Digest. On low saves, why couldn't you from 200 feet...if you really have to try it? Hopefully you make a good call on what's smart...what's not...for both the concept as well as how you, aircraft and weather fit into the equation on that day, at that time. Chatted with a pilot at the 1973 Liberal Nationals, the evening after he'd thermaled away from 50 feet in an ASW-12. Yup...50 feet. Not off the wall, really, as over a West Kansas section, not field, he ran into the lift on low final and continued in a shallow bank knowing if it all quit he'd just level out and land...stubble field. Well, finally coming around in a wide 360 he was 100 feet, and the process continued until thousands of feet and on his way! Was flying the meet in our Libelle, and on discussing it with him, remembering it a relatively calm day and it actually all made sense! Simpler times, few gadgets, more stick think. Do it today, wiser, older, and less sharp? Why? On long cockpit sits in a 1-26, or any of those upright gliders of the day, we didn't know any better, so did it. We were flying, man! Marfa 1967, in a 1-23, averaged about 6+ hours a day for eight in a row, with a couple pushing 8 hours. Of course I was 18, had a lot of foam jammed between the chute and small of the back, but last day was convinced I had a wound on my butt. Back still hurts today...but wouldn't have traded the opportunity for the world! Diamond C? We called them whatever. Three diamonds, diamond badge, diamond C, etc. Figured when you earned it, you could call it what you wished. Saw some who put diamonds on a Silver badge, for the heck of it...could do it on a C badge if ya wanted...ya earned it and the three diamonds told the story. Bronze C...back in '60's didn't exist, so C Badge was same as today's Bronze C. Later, with better gliders, stretched it out a bit. Unbelievable motivation when, on landing in a 2-22 with C-Badge duration your instructor handed you a C Badge, as Bernie Carris did to me in 1964 at Schweizers in Elmira. Badges are still marvelous tools today, that if properly presented and mentored, both compliments and encourages! RB- Buck |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 8:30:10 PM UTC-7, Robert Buck wrote:
At 16:47 30 March 2016, Jonathan St. Cloud wrote: Boy who flew with condors youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqHXiaMhSIo More on "Boy Who Flew with the Condors." On Chris Jury, yes, as mentioned, he flew and was the son of a TWA Captain. And yes, sadly lost in a powered aircraft accident. Never met either, although we were all circulating in the sport as youngsters about the same time...I was East Coast, they West. The movie was one of the reasons, as opinioned by Paul Schweizer, that helped the late sixties surge in the sport. Other two were the National Geographic article on the Reno 1966 Nationals, and Bob Buck's articles in Air Facts Magazine/Reader's Digest. On low saves, why couldn't you from 200 feet...if you really have to try it? Hopefully you make a good call on what's smart...what's not...for both the concept as well as how you, aircraft and weather fit into the equation on that day, at that time. Chatted with a pilot at the 1973 Liberal Nationals, the evening after he'd thermaled away from 50 feet in an ASW-12. Yup...50 feet. Not off the wall, really, as over a West Kansas section, not field, he ran into the lift on low final and continued in a shallow bank knowing if it all quit he'd just level out and land...stubble field. Well, finally coming around in a wide 360 he was 100 feet, and the process continued until thousands of feet and on his way! Was flying the meet in our Libelle, and on discussing it with him, remembering it a relatively calm day and it actually all made sense! Simpler times, few gadgets, more stick think. Do it today, wiser, older, and less sharp? Why? On long cockpit sits in a 1-26, or any of those upright gliders of the day, we didn't know any better, so did it. We were flying, man! Marfa 1967, in a 1-23, averaged about 6+ hours a day for eight in a row, with a couple pushing 8 hours. Of course I was 18, had a lot of foam jammed between the chute and small of the back, but last day was convinced I had a wound on my butt. Back still hurts today...but wouldn't have traded the opportunity for the world! Diamond C? We called them whatever. Three diamonds, diamond badge, diamond C, etc. Figured when you earned it, you could call it what you wished. Saw some who put diamonds on a Silver badge, for the heck of it...could do it on a C badge if ya wanted...ya earned it and the three diamonds told the story. Bronze C...back in '60's didn't exist, so C Badge was same as today's Bronze C. Later, with better gliders, stretched it out a bit. Unbelievable motivation when, on landing in a 2-22 with C-Badge duration your instructor handed you a C Badge, as Bernie Carris did to me in 1964 at Schweizers in Elmira. Badges are still marvelous tools today, that if properly presented and mentored, both compliments and encourages! RB- Buck You would like my book Rob. gary kemp |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On low saves, why couldn't you from 200 feet...if you really have to
try it? Hopefully you make a good call on what's smart...what's not...for both the concept as well as how you, aircraft and weather fit into the equation on that day, at that time. Chatted with a pilot at the 1973 Liberal Nationals, the evening after he'd thermaled away from 50 feet in an ASW-12. Yup...50 feet. Not off the wall, really, as over a West Kansas section, not field, he ran into the lift on low final and continued in a shallow bank knowing if it all quit he'd just level out and land...stubble field. Well, finally coming around in a wide 360 he was 100 feet, and the process continued until thousands of feet and on his way! Was flying the meet in our Libelle, and on discussing it with him, remembering it a relatively calm day and it actually all made sense! Simpler times, few gadgets, more stick think. I was newly into the sport at the time of the 1973 Liberal Nationals (which occurred roughly coincident with achieving my license), and did my best to pick the brains of my officemate, who was that ASW-12 pilot, upon his return from a portion of the country to which I'd not then been. That particular save was one of his vignettes from the contest. Lacking then the experience and knowledge to be able to put the tale into any sensible perspective, I enjoyed it as best I could and more or less promptly (well, except for the "height warnings" inherent to the telling of the tale) forgot about it until now! I, too, seem to remember it was told without bravado, but more a sense of amazement at the differences to be (occasionally) found between soaring in the mountains of Maryland and the plains of western Kansas. With the perspective of years and improved geographic knowledge/experience, I can better appreciate the tale now. Thin margins are thin margins, and always to be seriously respected by Joe Pilot, but I've never seen in them a need to universally, rigidly, apply someone else's sense of "safe" to the pilot world at large. My lowest save was from 650' agl (Texas, above a WW-II field) and lowest pattern entry ~400 feet (Texas, huge, disked half-section), and the former was much tougher due to the 20+ knot wind roiling things up, whereas the nearly-sunset latter was pretty much a breeze-free, "close your eyes and wait" sort of approach to a pre-ordained safe touchdown (so long as flying speed was maintained). I also witnessed a save from ~400' agl from the downwind-to-base turn (Texas, again), and except for the height agl, it was pretty much as described by the ASW-12 pilot...not "obviously and TV-dramatically" dodgy at all due to its being prudently performed...though distinctly unusual to vicariously experience because of the - by then well-understood - thin margin. My anxiety meter was glad I knew who that (conservative, prudent) pilot was, having by then seen many dodgier patterns at each of my hop-scotched home fields. ![]() I've sometimes tried to imagine my reaction to "The Boy Who Flew With Condors" had I seen it before becoming a participant in the sport! Bob W. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are many tails of Wally Scott thermaling away from a 200 foot auto tow.
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 7:08:57 AM UTC-7, BobW wrote: On low saves, why couldn't you from 200 feet...if you really have to try it? Hopefully you make a good call on what's smart...what's not...for both the concept as well as how you, aircraft and weather fit into the equation on that day, at that time. Chatted with a pilot at the 1973 Liberal Nationals, the evening after he'd thermaled away from 50 feet in an ASW-12. Yup...50 feet. Not off the wall, really, as over a West Kansas section, not field, he ran into the lift on low final and continued in a shallow bank knowing if it all quit he'd just level out and land...stubble field. Well, finally coming around in a wide 360 he was 100 feet, and the process continued until thousands of feet and on his way! Was flying the meet in our Libelle, and on discussing it with him, remembering it a relatively calm day and it actually all made sense! Simpler times, few gadgets, more stick think. I was newly into the sport at the time of the 1973 Liberal Nationals (which occurred roughly coincident with achieving my license), and did my best to pick the brains of my officemate, who was that ASW-12 pilot, upon his return from a portion of the country to which I'd not then been. That particular save was one of his vignettes from the contest. Lacking then the experience and knowledge to be able to put the tale into any sensible perspective, I enjoyed it as best I could and more or less promptly (well, except for the "height warnings" inherent to the telling of the tale) forgot about it until now! I, too, seem to remember it was told without bravado, but more a sense of amazement at the differences to be (occasionally) found between soaring in the mountains of Maryland and the plains of western Kansas. With the perspective of years and improved geographic knowledge/experience, I can better appreciate the tale now. Thin margins are thin margins, and always to be seriously respected by Joe Pilot, but I've never seen in them a need to universally, rigidly, apply someone else's sense of "safe" to the pilot world at large. My lowest save was from 650' agl (Texas, above a WW-II field) and lowest pattern entry ~400 feet (Texas, huge, disked half-section), and the former was much tougher due to the 20+ knot wind roiling things up, whereas the nearly-sunset latter was pretty much a breeze-free, "close your eyes and wait" sort of approach to a pre-ordained safe touchdown (so long as flying speed was maintained). I also witnessed a save from ~400' agl from the downwind-to-base turn (Texas, again), and except for the height agl, it was pretty much as described by the ASW-12 pilot...not "obviously and TV-dramatically" dodgy at all due to its being prudently performed...though distinctly unusual to vicariously experience because of the - by then well-understood - thin margin. My anxiety meter was glad I knew who that (conservative, prudent) pilot was, having by then seen many dodgier patterns at each of my hop-scotched home fields. ![]() I've sometimes tried to imagine my reaction to "The Boy Who Flew With Condors" had I seen it before becoming a participant in the sport! Bob W. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Also, available for purchase legally he http://www.cumulus-soaring.com/video...lewWithCondors Good Soaring, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. _______________________________________ "Jonathan St. Cloud" wrote in message ... Boy who flew with condors youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqHXiaMhSIo |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 5:39:40 AM UTC-4, wrote:
Old thread but I'm enjoying the movie. How little has changed in 50 years. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And of Dick Johnson wafting away from hanger top height, in a Skylark 4 I believe..
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dick Johnson Video Interview | Kemp[_2_] | Soaring | 3 | August 7th 08 07:37 PM |
Dick Johnson is gone. | Burt Compton - Marfa | Soaring | 23 | July 27th 08 05:38 PM |
Updated Boy Who Flew With Condors page | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | June 28th 08 03:56 AM |
Contacts of Dick Johnson | Francisco De Almeida | Soaring | 1 | January 1st 06 06:07 PM |
SSA Dick Johnson sailplane reviews: available to all | Martin Gregorie | Soaring | 13 | September 27th 05 06:41 PM |