Experimentals To Be Banned To Rural Airports?

In article ,
Gezellig wrote:

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 16:19:12 -0700, Tom C wrote:

"Gezellig" wrote in message
...

this opinion stated three or four times in this thread. Care to comment?

HUH???? What hazards of airparks? There has been nothing in this thread
about it!

What hazards? Get serious, air parks like any other airfield have
hazards.

Golf developments have more.

Tom "F*&^%$g sand traps" C

More? OK, at least there is a consensus that airparks, as golf courses,
are hazardous.

As I look back on the thread about this subject, I see the same sorts of
blinded airpark enthusiasm. What I find from "Living With Your Plane"
and many other rationale discussions is the admittance to the hazards.

WRONG!

What you see is people acknowledging risks associated with any endeavor
-- not specifically airparks. There is nothing to suggest any additional
hazard due to airparks. In fact, the presence of hangar space should
reduce hazards, due to lower environmental degradation than planes
exposed to the elements.

You will find your share of doofuses in any activity -- especially when
shaving or brushing your teeth.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.

In article ,
Gezellig wrote:

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:16:46 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:

In article ,
Gezellig wrote:

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:31:17 -0700, Tom C wrote:

Now you have this guy who hates GA and the clueless people who were
sold a bill of goods by developers that encroached on an airport that's
been
there since WW II and we have one melting ball of wax.

In another thread I was reading about the hazards of airparks. The
discussion were adamant about that not being the case yet here I have
this opinion stated three or four times in this thread. Care to comment?

HUH???? What hazards of airparks? There has been nothing in this thread
about it!

What hazards? Get serious, air parks like any other airfield have
hazards.

Just like roads, parking lots, water buckets, bicycles, frozen salmon...

On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:21:53 -0700, Steve Hix wrote:

In article ,
Gezellig wrote:

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:16:46 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:

In article ,
Gezellig wrote:

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:31:17 -0700, Tom C wrote:

Now you have this guy who hates GA and the clueless people who were
sold a bill of goods by developers that encroached on an airport that's
been
there since WW II and we have one melting ball of wax.

In another thread I was reading about the hazards of airparks. The
discussion were adamant about that not being the case yet here I have
this opinion stated three or four times in this thread. Care to comment?

HUH???? What hazards of airparks? There has been nothing in this thread
about it!

What hazards? Get serious, air parks like any other airfield have
hazards.

Just like roads, parking lots, water buckets, bicycles, frozen salmon...

Correct.