Daryl Hunt Rides Again (was [Admin] us.military.army FAQ M1A4 - Special Post -)

On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:18:41 GMT, Tank Fixer
wrote:


As for the A-12s, they were there in the 70s. I Physically saw them lined
up in a nice little row on the tarmak along with support equipment (power
units). What they were doing there, I have no idea.

IIRC there were what a half dozen or so A-12 built in the early 60's ?

Funny that you could see them in the 1970's when they had been retired and
placed in storage in 1968.

The "storage" was the ramp at AF Plant 42. They were pretty easy to
see, at least in later years, sprayed with some sort of white stuff.
I've saw the A-12s regularly. You could even snap photos while flying
near, but not over, Plant 42.

However, I have nothing to add regarding the rest of this except
agreement with Tank Fixer.

Mary

--
Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer

In article ,
says...
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:18:41 GMT, Tank Fixer
wrote:


As for the A-12s, they were there in the 70s. I Physically saw them lined
up in a nice little row on the tarmak along with support equipment (power
units). What they were doing there, I have no idea.

IIRC there were what a half dozen or so A-12 built in the early 60's ?

Funny that you could see them in the 1970's when they had been retired and
placed in storage in 1968.

The "storage" was the ramp at AF Plant 42. They were pretty easy to
see, at least in later years, sprayed with some sort of white stuff.
I've saw the A-12s regularly. You could even snap photos while flying
near, but not over, Plant 42.

Thanks, DM claims to have seen them at Groom Lake in the 1970's pre-
flighted and with start carts.

However, I have nothing to add regarding the rest of this except
agreement with Tank Fixer.





--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

"Mary Shafer" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:18:41 GMT, Tank Fixer
wrote:


As for the A-12s, they were there in the 70s. I Physically saw them
lined
up in a nice little row on the tarmak along with support equipment
(power
units). What they were doing there, I have no idea.

IIRC there were what a half dozen or so A-12 built in the early 60's ?

Funny that you could see them in the 1970's when they had been retired
and
placed in storage in 1968.

The "storage" was the ramp at AF Plant 42. They were pretty easy to
see, at least in later years, sprayed with some sort of white stuff.
I've saw the A-12s regularly. You could even snap photos while flying
near, but not over, Plant 42.

However, I have nothing to add regarding the rest of this except
agreement with Tank Fixer.

Except you just disagreed with him in his assessment that the A-12 could not
possibly be there. You and I both know they were. What you saw was them
putting them into mothballs. I saw them prior to that just before they were
mothballed.

In article , says...

"Mary Shafer" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:18:41 GMT, Tank Fixer
wrote:


As for the A-12s, they were there in the 70s. I Physically saw them
lined
up in a nice little row on the tarmak along with support equipment
(power
units). What they were doing there, I have no idea.

IIRC there were what a half dozen or so A-12 built in the early 60's ?

Funny that you could see them in the 1970's when they had been retired
and
placed in storage in 1968.

The "storage" was the ramp at AF Plant 42. They were pretty easy to
see, at least in later years, sprayed with some sort of white stuff.
I've saw the A-12s regularly. You could even snap photos while flying
near, but not over, Plant 42.

However, I have nothing to add regarding the rest of this except
agreement with Tank Fixer.

Except you just disagreed with him in his assessment that the A-12 could not
possibly be there. You and I both know they were. What you saw was them
putting them into mothballs. I saw them prior to that just before they were
mothballed.



You claim to have seen them in the 1970's.

The remaining A12's were mothballed in 1968.

Which is it daryl?

--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

Admin wrote:

"Mary Shafer" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:18:41 GMT, Tank Fixer
wrote:


As for the A-12s, they were there in the 70s. I Physically saw them
lined
up in a nice little row on the tarmak along with support equipment
(power
units). What they were doing there, I have no idea.

IIRC there were what a half dozen or so A-12 built in the early 60's ?

Funny that you could see them in the 1970's when they had been retired
and
placed in storage in 1968.

The "storage" was the ramp at AF Plant 42. They were pretty easy to
see, at least in later years, sprayed with some sort of white stuff.
I've saw the A-12s regularly. You could even snap photos while flying
near, but not over, Plant 42.

However, I have nothing to add regarding the rest of this except
agreement with Tank Fixer.

Except you just disagreed with him in his assessment that the A-12 could not
possibly be there. You and I both know they were. What you saw was them
putting them into mothballs. I saw them prior to that just before they were
mothballed.

they were withdraw from service and mothballed in Palmdale CA, in 1968.
how could you see them in Nevada, in use, in the 1970's?

redc1c4
and you wonder why folks call you a bull****ter.
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide