![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote...
Ed did not address the use of spoiler flap as used to cancel adverse Yaw, produced by roll steering. Ed's description of the spoiler is refers only to a spolier flap in a speedbrake configuration and while textbook in nature, has been false for airliners since the 707; except twins. (engine out regulations for twins require a tall tail, so the mechinisation of a spoiler flap carrys too large a weight penalty to be practical) I don't think any of us have ever seen any documentation in any book or technical publication that refers to a "spoiler flap" -- so far, the term appears to have been created by Tarver, here in the newsgroup. OTOH, through the years I have seen several just-as-ridiculous descriptions of aeronautical equipment and their [alleged] functions in the popular press (newspapers and non-technical magazines, apparently written by people not familiar with airplanes. The statement "a spoiler flap in a speedbrake configuration and while textbook in nature, has been false for airliners since the 707; except twins" sounds like a new Tarverism, worthy of archiving. Its actual meaning escapes me, though the misinterpretations and misinformation that could easily be drawn from it by people looking for information are numerous. Just a few examples: I have never read about "a spoiler flap in a speedbrake configuration" in any textbook. Anyone else? From "false for airliners since the 707; except twins" it is possible to infer that the L-1011, DC-10, MD-11, 747, and other 3- and 4-engine airliners do not have spoilers or speedbrakes. Of course, we all know that is false. The statement that "engine out regulations for twins require a tall tail" is clearly false in the general case, as evidenced by the DC-9, MD-80, and B-717, as well as numerous business jets with fuselage-mounted engines. And finally, "...require a tall tail, so the mechinisation of a spoiler flap carrys too large a weight penalty to be practical" makes no sense whatsoever, because: (1) we don't yet know what a "spoiler flap" is; (2) spoilers "mechani[zed]" as speedbrakes are in fact used on virtually every modern airliner; and (3) the height of an airplane's tail has no bearing on whether or not spoilers "mechani[zed]" as speedbrakes are practical -- they are apparent on both tall-tail (e.g., 777) and short-tail (e.g., MD-80) airliners. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John R Weiss" wrote in message news:0nZLb.16052$na.13316@attbi_s04... snip of Weiss way behind the power curve I have never read about "a spoiler flap in a speedbrake configuration" in any textbook. Anyone else? You might want to look at the recorded parameters for the DFDR on your 747-400. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:46:52 +0000, John Mullen
wrote: Not to mention 'splaps', but that's getting a bit technical... John I wondered how long it would take. Mere minutes... Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:46:52 +0000, John Mullen wrote: Not to mention 'splaps', but that's getting a bit technical... I wondered how long it would take. Mere minutes... It is what the troll is about, Ed. I wrote kreuger and fowler flaps, as full names of wing extensions, and so the discussion came here. Surely you must understand the sweet irony I am enjoying. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Rasimus wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:46:52 +0000, John Mullen wrote: Not to mention 'splaps', but that's getting a bit technical... John I wondered how long it would take. Mere minutes... Heh heh! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Mullen" wrote in message ... Ed Rasimus wrote: On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:46:52 +0000, John Mullen wrote: Not to mention 'splaps', but that's getting a bit technical... John I wondered how long it would take. Mere minutes... Heh heh! And yet, all Mullen did was demonstrate his own ignorance. You have to love the irony. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Rasimus" wrote...
Slats are typically UN-powered devices on the leading edge that extend simply by the reduced dynamic pressure against them as airspeed slows. Example would be the leading edge extensions of the F-86 and F-100. There are powered examples as well, such as the A-6 and EA-6B. Some leading and trailing edge flaps are "slotted" meaning they create a gap in the airfoil when extended. There are all sorts of variations including Krueger flaps, Fowler flaps, "BLC" (boundary layer control) blown flaps, flaperons that combine both flap and aileron functions, and spoilers which disrupt airflow across the top of the wing to reduce lift/increase drag. Just so there is no confusion, flaperons and spoilers are not [normally] used as leading edge devices. It may be a matter of semantics on different airplanes types, but "flaperons" as used by Grumman on the A-6 and EA-6B serve as spoilers and ailerons, but NOT as flaps. There ARE several aircraft such as the F-4 that used drooped ailerons as flaps, but I have not heard or seen them called "flaperons." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John R Weiss" wrote in message news:9WYLb.15782$na.12393@attbi_s04... "Ed Rasimus" wrote... Slats are typically UN-powered devices on the leading edge that extend simply by the reduced dynamic pressure against them as airspeed slows. Example would be the leading edge extensions of the F-86 and F-100. There are powered examples as well, such as the A-6 and EA-6B. Some leading and trailing edge flaps are "slotted" meaning they create a gap in the airfoil when extended. There are all sorts of variations including Krueger flaps, Fowler flaps, "BLC" (boundary layer control) blown flaps, flaperons that combine both flap and aileron functions, and spoilers which disrupt airflow across the top of the wing to reduce lift/increase drag. Just so there is no confusion, flaperons and spoilers are not [normally] used as leading edge devices. It may be a matter of semantics on different airplanes types, but "flaperons" as used by Grumman on the A-6 and EA-6B serve as spoilers and ailerons, but NOT as flaps. I like the B-52 contrast in tail heights as an excellnt demonstration of the advantages of spoilers as a control surface, as opposed to the speed brake configuration. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"B2431" wrote...
Splaperons? Only in Tehachipi... OK, maybe I could have resisted ![]() But why? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS - Propeller leading edge protective tape | Sammy | Home Built | 0 | July 6th 04 12:06 PM |
Leading edge protection search | Tim Hickey | Home Built | 0 | June 28th 04 02:45 AM |
A Bush C150? With Leading Edge Slats? | [email protected] | Home Built | 33 | May 27th 04 05:39 PM |
-7 wing leading edge 'glitch' ? | Charlie England | Home Built | 0 | March 7th 04 12:27 AM |
tail buffeting and leading edge fillets, strakes | Wallace Berry | Home Built | 1 | September 26th 03 10:48 PM |