A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

an interesting in flight experiment



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 18th 09, 04:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default an interesting in flight experiment

"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"twdeckard" wrote

I am sure you know all of this (grin), I just chimed in becuase its a
check best done on the run-up pad.


He did not say you shouldn't do it at run-up. He was just pointing out
that your engine could run very rough if you lose one side while cruising.

--
Jim in NC

I am really not sure exactly what he tried to say; but, in his initial post,
it was clear that he had lost the use of all of one mag and a part of the
other--or the plugs or wires attached to it.

The problem with that is that mags have a couple of failure modes that are
common to all breaker point ignition systems in addition to the failure
modes that are peculiar to magnetos.

As far as I know, it is still a common practice to simply set the timing and
perform a runup type mag check as part of an annual and not open the mags to
gap and visually check the points. That leaves the door a lot farther open
for the failure modes involving erosion of the points--which is related to
one of the two failure modes of the capacitor a/k/a condenser--and also to
wear of the cam follower. Both of those failure modes usually make the
engine harder to start long before they will fail in flight, or at runup
test; but are masked sufficiently by electric starters that they can go
virtually unnoticed--unless the pilot is so dilligent as to carefully prime
and set the throttle and then count the blades on nearly every start.

Peter



  #2  
Old October 18th 09, 05:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
a[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 562
Default an interesting in flight experiment

On Oct 18, 10:40*am, "Peter Dohm" wrote:
"Morgans" wrote in message

...

"twdeckard" wrote


I am sure you know all of this (grin), I just chimed in becuase its a
check best done on the run-up pad.


He did not say you shouldn't do it at run-up. *He was just pointing out
that your engine could run very rough if you lose one side while cruising.


--
Jim in NC


I am really not sure exactly what he tried to say; but, in his initial post,
it was clear that he had lost the use of all of one mag and a part of the
other--or the plugs or wires attached to it.

The problem with that is that mags have a couple of failure modes that are
common to all breaker point ignition systems in addition to the failure
modes that are peculiar to magnetos.

As far as I know, it is still a common practice to simply set the timing and
perform a runup type mag check as part of an annual and not open the mags to
gap and visually check the points. *That leaves the door a lot farther open
for the failure modes involving erosion of the points--which is related to
one of the two failure modes of the capacitor a/k/a condenser--and also to
wear of the cam follower. *Both of those failure modes usually make the
engine harder to start long before they will fail in flight, or at runup
test; but are masked sufficiently by electric starters that they can go
virtually unnoticed--unless the pilot is so dilligent as to carefully prime
and set the throttle and then count the blades on nearly every start.

Peter


To put several of your minds at ease, of course I did the conventional
both-right-both-left mag check at runup, but at 1900 RPM. I had not
had one bank of spark plugs go in/op ever until the in flight failure
a little while ago, and my post was simply to suggest pilots go to one
mag while at cruise rpm and engine loading to see what happens. In my
case the engine ran a bit rougher -- rpms stayed where they were set,
of course, because prop pitch changed to accommodate the reduction in
power.

I am sure I make lots of inadvertent errors when flying: missing a mag
check is not one of them.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting and different flight on OLC Dave Nadler Soaring 2 August 4th 09 02:06 PM
Solar Flight Much more interesting than Hilarious Video Richard[_1_] Soaring 0 December 5th 08 05:07 PM
Interesting 2-plane takeoff at BWI 4-28-06 (formation flight) Gary G General Aviation 2 May 1st 06 09:42 PM
An interesting trial flight attempt... [email protected] Soaring 35 February 12th 06 08:31 PM
A small experiment Mike Borgelt Soaring 16 May 6th 05 07:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.