1-26 for first glider, or not?

Wow, I posted this, went out and ran some errands, came back and I see
19 replies already! I knew it would be some great reading!

I should have mentioned, I am on the east coast of the US, central
Florida (ie: no ridges). So far wind is usually under 10 knots, and
bases at around 4,000 - 6,000 MSL. Well, in the summer anyway.

So far, the 1-26, Ka6, and 1-34 or 1-35. Interestingly these are the
planes I have been seeing often in the classifieds within my price
range, the 1-26 and Ka6 being the most affordable.

How would you compare the assembly/disassembly among the four?

Not interested in having a partner just yet, so that is not an option.

Thanks!
Tom

On Nov 12, 6:13*pm, tstock wrote:
Wow, I posted this, went out and ran some errands, came back and I see
19 replies already! *I knew it would be some great reading!

I should have mentioned, I am on the east coast of the US, central
Florida (ie: no ridges). *So far wind is usually under 10 knots, and
bases at around 4,000 - 6,000 MSL. *Well, in the summer anyway.

So far, the 1-26, Ka6, and 1-34 or 1-35. *Interestingly these are the
planes I have been seeing often in the classifieds within my price
range, the 1-26 and Ka6 being the most affordable.

How would you compare the assembly/disassembly among the four?

Not interested in having a partner just yet, so that is not an option.

Thanks!
Tom

I have a 1-35 and the trailer next to me is a Discus "C." If we help
one another with wings we're done in the same amount of time. He has
to add the 18m tips. I have to connect the ailerons and tape the
turtledeck so it's a wash.

What about a 1-23? Everyone likes those.

agl

"AGL" wrote in message ...
On Nov 12, 6:13 pm, tstock wrote:


I have a 1-35 and the trailer next to me is a Discus "C." If we help
one another with wings we're done in the same amount of time. He has
to add the 18m tips. I have to connect the ailerons and tape the
turtledeck so it's a wash.

What about a 1-23? Everyone likes those.

agl

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schweizer_SGS_1-23

It is the sailplane that Paul Bikle flew when setting the world altitude gain record in 1961.

On Nov 12, 5:55*pm, AGL wrote:
On Nov 12, 6:13*pm, tstock wrote:



Wow, I posted this, went out and ran some errands, came back and I see
19 replies already! *I knew it would be some great reading!

I should have mentioned, I am on the east coast of the US, central
Florida (ie: no ridges). *So far wind is usually under 10 knots, and
bases at around 4,000 - 6,000 MSL. *Well, in the summer anyway.

So far, the 1-26, Ka6, and 1-34 or 1-35. *Interestingly these are the
planes I have been seeing often in the classifieds within my price
range, the 1-26 and Ka6 being the most affordable.

How would you compare the assembly/disassembly among the four?

Not interested in having a partner just yet, so that is not an option.

Thanks!
Tom

I have a 1-35 and the trailer next to me is a Discus "C." *If we help
one another with wings we're done in the same amount of time. *He has
to add the 18m tips. *I have to connect the ailerons and tape the
turtledeck so it's a wash.

What about a 1-23? *Everyone likes those.

agl

Oh Yes! the 1-23 is also a good choice, better performance than the
26 and just as crashworthy. But, they are gonna cost more like 10K.
The 34 is a great machine too. Though flaps aren't a big deal you may
find yourself spending an entire season getting confident with
landings in a 35 when you could be flying cross country. We have 2 of
those at my home club and they never go anywhere. For my money it's
hard to beat the K6. The performance is sweet and the handling is
legendary. I know one that recently sold for $4500 to a new glider
pilot who started flying it cross country his first season. You can
buy a LOT of tows with the money saved.

On Nov 12, 9:36*am, tstock wrote:
I know I will get replies on each end of the spectrum...

SNIP

We have a few 1-26's at our club and often can’t fly them because it's
too windy. Our club rule is to never fly a 1-26 downwind. From time
to time someone vows to try landing one backwards against a headwind.
As well, our cloudbase is usually low so a 1-26 doesn’t have a good
enough L/D to get you to the next thermal.

If there was usually less than 5 knots of wind and a decent cloudbase
they would be a lot of fun.

agl

On Nov 12, 2:48*pm, AGL wrote:
On Nov 12, 9:36*am, tstock wrote:

I know I will get replies on each end of the spectrum...

SNIP

We have a few 1-26's at our club and often can’t fly them because it's
too windy. Our club rule is to never fly a 1-26 downwind. * From time
to time someone vows to try landing one backwards against a headwind.
As well, our cloudbase is usually low so a 1-26 doesn’t have a good
enough L/D to get you to the next thermal.

If there was usually less than 5 knots of wind and a decent cloudbase
they would be a lot of fun.

agl

get the trailer set up. if you are spending all your effort trying to
stay upwind in a 1-26 I can see why you don't like. Little known
secret of low performance soaring: All the FUN is downwind of the
airport.

On Nov 12, 2:59*pm, Tony wrote:
On Nov 12, 2:48*pm, AGL wrote:





On Nov 12, 9:36*am, tstock wrote:

I know I will get replies on each end of the spectrum...

SNIP

We have a few 1-26's at our club and often can’t fly them because it's
too windy. Our club rule is to never fly a 1-26 downwind. * From time
to time someone vows to try landing one backwards against a headwind.
As well, our cloudbase is usually low so a 1-26 doesn’t have a good
enough L/D to get you to the next thermal.

If there was usually less than 5 knots of wind and a decent cloudbase
they would be a lot of fun.

agl

get the trailer set up. if you are spending all your effort trying to
stay upwind in a 1-26 I can see why you don't like. *Little known
secret of low performance soaring: All the FUN is downwind of the
airport.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don't discount "old wood" I am having a ball with my Ka-6, and they do
come up for sale on a regular basis. $6000 should buy you a pretty
nice Ka-6, and while it isn't a lead sled it will go upwind. On the
plus side it's still a floater, so if you live in the midwest it's
hard to beat. Remember the Ka-6 was the hot standard class ship in the
late 50's and early 60's.

Pete

Ka-6Cr

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:42:00 -0800, vontresc wrote:

Don't discount "old wood" I am having a ball with my Ka-6, and they do
come up for sale on a regular basis. $6000 should buy you a pretty nice
Ka-6, and while it isn't a lead sled it will go upwind. On the plus side
it's still a floater, so if you live in the midwest it's hard to beat.
Remember the Ka-6 was the hot standard class ship in the late 50's and
early 60's.

I've never heard anybody say bad things about the Ka-6.

One of our guys has a very nice one with a few decent toys on the panel.
It has an excellent trailer too, not that he lands out often. He's had it
for 12 years and done several 300s in it, almost always off the winch.
Thats in UK conditions - moderate breeze, cloud base 4000-5000ft or
6000ft if you're lucky and thermals in the 3 - 5 kt band.

Its on my list of gliders I'd like to fly some time.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |

On Nov 12, 1:59*pm, Tony wrote:
On Nov 12, 2:48*pm, AGL wrote:





On Nov 12, 9:36*am, tstock wrote:

I know I will get replies on each end of the spectrum...

SNIP

We have a few 1-26's at our club and often can’t fly them because it's
too windy. Our club rule is to never fly a 1-26 downwind. * From time
to time someone vows to try landing one backwards against a headwind.
As well, our cloudbase is usually low so a 1-26 doesn’t have a good
enough L/D to get you to the next thermal.

If there was usually less than 5 knots of wind and a decent cloudbase
they would be a lot of fun.

agl

get the trailer set up. if you are spending all your effort trying to
stay upwind in a 1-26 I can see why you don't like. *Little known
secret of low performance soaring: All the FUN is downwind of the
airport.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I will second the good trailer idea. I could assembly my 1-26 almost
as fast as the local glass ships (15-20 minutes)
The tail stayed assembled on the open trailer so no assembly there, so
just attach the wings hook up the ailerons and spoilers, tighten the
wing pins attach and tape the turtle deck and I was ready to fly.

One consideration is what do your other local area pilots fly, If you
have at least one other 1-26 or simliar performance airplane the fun
level of the 1-26 can increase exponationally as you can fly together,
if every one is flying 35+:1 gliders then you will probably quickly
tire if being left behind or landing on days when everyone else is
still flying.

Brian

On Nov 12, 7:36*am, tstock wrote:
I know I will get replies on each end of the spectrum... but for a
first glider, low time pilot, it seems like a 1-26 would be a good
choice. *Easy to fly, easy to land in tight spaces, cheap to maintain,
and very common and there are a few 1-26 groups, so help is
available. *It's inexpensive (well under $10,000 USD, more like $6K).
I happen to like "old" stuff, like VW busses, etc, so the vintage
aspect of the 1-26 appeals to me. *Also, I like the idea of starting
"at the beginning", maybe that's just me.

Of course, there is the option to buy an early fiberglass glider for
around 10K, but at that price it's likely a fairly uncommon glider,
hard to find parts for, and maybe not a good plane for a low time
pilot (flaps, etc). *20K would be better but right now that is outside
by budget.

I admit, reading the entire issue of the last soaring issue dedicated
to the 1-26 did lead me down this path. *My wife read it also and
started asking me questions about the 1-26.

So, before I start looking for a 1-26 is there any reason I should
not? *My plan would be to fly the 1-26 for about 5 years and then find
something more modern when funds allow and I've gained more
experience.

Opinions? *If prefer to stay out of the debate you can always email me
privately.

Thanks
-tom

The only thing I will mention is to consider where you are located and
the flying conditions. In some areas the thermals are close enough
spaced that a 1-26 is just fine, other you will be very limited on
where you can fly.

In Northern Utah a 1-26 would not be very useful. The thermals are
often too far apart to jump the gaps between valleys and on ridge days
the lack of l/d especially at higher speeds and penetration would
leave you stuck at home when everyone else is gone.

As always the suggestion of partners in a good glass ship is worth
looking into. For 18 to 20K you can have a much higher performance
ship with two partners. It is a good way to start flying and provides
a built in crew system.