![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"FlyingStarts" wrote in message ... Thank you Peppo. I must confess that I had rushed to judgement myself on this case. Not for brags but context, I'm an 8KHr CFIIMEIG and like most of us I'm embarrassed to miss a call or flub a handoff/ checking in. Like many aviators I've also had an adversarial encounter with FAA inspectors intent on collecting scalps for transgressors, and like many Americans I am dismayed at the fascistic- esque/politicization (on the part of regulators throughout government) and apathy (on the part of "terrorized" citizenry) in our nation. Regardless, I did not buy the stories reported in the media, and had leapt to the same conclusion as some in high FAA/political places may have- that the Cpt and FO had both fallen asleep. Now, I think that legal counsel has done these pilots a disservice. When a case (or an entire transportation sector) becomes this politically-charged, there is a political job to do in addition to legal protection for the clients. We are an increasingly judgmental and impressionable society, and our regulatory and judicial systems are at the mercy of strong collective emotions, often hasty and irrational. I'm not immune to these failings myself, although I try to be. Thank you very much for opening my eyes to the aspects of this sad episode that I had not sufficiently considered. I had come to assume (without reliable evidence) that people are lying in order to bury controversy/panic over flight crew fatigue regulation. You have caused be to consider that we are instead experiencing deep societal ignorance and rashness, akin to book-burnings and inquisitions of sick societies past: We are (as a society) becoming over-sensitized to collectively-perceived and media-enhanced risks such as terrorism, liability, personal accountability, and the role of government. They don't call it the Holy Spanish Inquisition (just career-wrecking in the "interest" of "public safety") we're not burning books (just becoming hopelessly confused about portable devices, EFBs, etc.) and our government isn't openly messing up citizens' lives in order to intimidate us all (right?). Unless I pay careful attention, and stand up with and for my fellow Americans under the onslaught of authoritarianism, I'm a part of the problem, and not it's solution. Thanks for a very eye-opening post. I have some retractions to make now, for casual, cynical remarks I've made to various people, about hasty assumptions. I'm now ashamed to have doubted these fellow aviators. But I do wish that their lawyers had been more sensitive to the importance of communicating to the public in a credible way at the outset of another high-profile national witch-hunt. You've provided me much food for thought, Peppo. And my compliments on this Group in general (first post here) Blue skies, and not so much tailwind, should you ever (who me?) get behind the airplane again. -Rob Excellent response, and for a welcome change, perceptive and well spoken. Nicely done. Welcome to a much reduced group of long time regulars who are now mostly lurkers. I can only offer you a small warning to use caution and 'don't feed the trolls'. Happy landings, |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| National Seashore/bird sanctuary overflight altitudes? | TonyR | Piloting | 2 | November 19th 06 12:13 AM |
| Grand Canyon overflight proposal | john smith | Piloting | 71 | April 23rd 06 06:30 AM |
| Niagara Falls overflight | Bartscher | Piloting | 8 | May 31st 04 10:31 PM |
| Canada overflight question | SeeAndAvoid | Piloting | 15 | February 1st 04 11:00 PM |