![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kirk, I was at the same tour that Jim was. The scenario was in
relationship to how a controller sees aircraft on his screen and what alarms go off when two aircraft are near each other. Here's how I understood it. In general, two aircraft squawking 1200 are on VFR, not talking to the controller, and if they get close to each other, as say a towplane and glider might, or two gliders in the same thermal or wave might be, no alarm goes off and the controller won't (and really can't) do anything. He's not talking to either plane and they might not even be on his frequency. However, if a plane is assigned a discrete code, anytime that plane goes near another plane, including those squawking 1200, an alarm will go off on the controllers screen about potential collisions. Now, with gliders, this isn't going to happen all that much. Unless another GA plane on flight following comes nearby or a glider asks for clearance in a wave window, I don't think that we end up with discrete squawk codes all that often. In Cal City, there are two possible wave window clearance dictates, and with one of them, discrete codes are not necessarily assigned. However, in the other one, they are, and there is the possibility that two gliders on discrete clearance codes can (and may want to) fly near each other. This obviously will drive controllers nuts, so it may simply be courteous to mention to the controller than you are going to fly near each other as a flight, and switch your transponder to standby if the controller agrees. Of course, if you break away, notify the controller again such that he still knows where you are. This has nothing to do with standard VFR 1200 traffic. Nor anything to do with the special 0440 code used in the Reno area (and which is specially programmed into the Reno area controller's screens to behave like a 1200 squawk). In the MOA's around Cal City, in one of the wave window clearance, all non-1200 traffic is diverted around the window, so the only potential conflicts are other gliders. In the other, military traffic may use the same area as the wave window, and the military planes may or may have the transponder data from gliders with discrete codes (we didn't really talk about that). But military pilots probably will end up staying away from the wave window area if they're smart once the controller mentions that the window is active and there are gliders in the area. I think that summed up the brief talk had with the controller supervisor at Joshua. Maybe someone else who was there can correct me. Jason Kramb On 3/7/2010 1:22 PM, kirk.stant wrote: On Mar 7, 10:57 am, wrote: I must have been hallucinating during the briefing at Joshua approach. Time to give up. Jim Jim, I'd be really interested to hear what what is being said in the Joshua approach briefing. It could be a misunderstanding, or an actual lack of knowledge between agencies and users on each other's capabilities - not the first time that has happened. Has there been a reciprocal briefing of glider operations and capabilities to Center and AF personnel? I know when I've worked with the AF on similar issues in the Luke area (coordinating for regional contest, which would be transiting hot MOAs during the week), there were often misconceptions (!!) that had to be cleared up, on both sides. Cheers, Kirk 66 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jason,
Thanks for the explanation; that all makes sense. It would seem that if the discrete code becomes a problem in a wave window, then a common code (like the Reno 0440 code) would be one way for ATC to handle it - that would still give TCAS protection for airliners, bizjets, etc. It looks like there was some confusion about military aircraft transponder use - bottom line: in common use (civilian and military) airspace, military aircraft are handled just like civilian aircraft with transponders - if IFR they are talking to center and get normal IFR handling, if VFR (say in a MOA running low altitude intercepts) then they are like other VFR traffic with transponders (and many with TCAS and interrogators): They may not be talking to center (they will be on their own freq) so having a TPAS in a glider will definitely help, and a transponder in the glider may help the military aircraft detect and avoid the glider. Good conversation, all in all, IMHO. Cheers, KIrk 66 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
transponders in EU | Sandro | Soaring | 2 | February 2nd 07 01:02 PM |
Saw an Interesting thing this weekend at the airport | Kevin Kubiak | Piloting | 12 | December 8th 05 11:19 PM |
Mode S transponders | Wallis | Home Built | 4 | March 10th 05 10:33 AM |
Transponders | [email protected] | Home Built | 2 | March 2nd 05 02:39 AM |
Transponders | Mil80C | Soaring | 64 | February 12th 04 05:46 PM |