![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Aug 13, 5:56*pm, Andy wrote:
What would be the consequence of using a link say 10% weaker than that specified? *If I know the link is weaker I can fly a less agressive climb profile and accept that I will get a lower launch altitude. *If I forget and climb agressively the link will break - so what? Andy The consequence of using a 10% weaker link would be a greater chance of a broken weak link and a failed launch, which might be hazardous in itself under some circumstances. If you use the correct link as specified by the glider designer and the glider is in airworthy condition, there should be no chance of a structural failure. All gliders in the UK have to have an annual inspection and airworthiness review. The glider that failed was a 30 year old wooden design. It has been suggested that the tapered main pin might not have been fully engaged, but the glider had survived a previous winch launch. My sincere condolences to the family and friends of this young lady pilot. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-10949058 Derek C |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| physics question about pull ups | John Rivers | Soaring | 59 | June 10th 10 01:21 PM |
| FS: Wings&Wheels Wing Stand | James Hamilton[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | September 12th 09 02:15 AM |
| Pull up a chair and hear me out: | Vaughn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 2nd 06 03:04 AM |
| Better GPS, Flight Computer, Variable Wing Geometry, abililty to Self-Launch | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 7 | May 2nd 05 07:02 PM |
| Glider pull-up and ballast | M B | Soaring | 0 | September 15th 03 07:29 PM |