![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 10, 12:23*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote: On Sep 10, 2:09*am, Mxsmanic wrote: Mark writes: Relatively speaking the price of an airplane today is much higher than they were in the 1970's as compared to the value of a dollar and average wages back then. *And really, if you look at the price of complex automobiles with all the bells and whistles there really is no justification for planes to be priced so high. There just isn't that much more technology or material. A shrinking market, Why do you think the market is shrinking? *I think it's growing. Then your thinking is clouded. The market has been shrinking for a couple of decades, but I believe there is a resurgence of interest at this time. Unfortunately the economy right now is killing growth. The sales numbers are out there for anyone to see and the market is shrinking in all sectors from GA to airliners. Yes sales are off. Interest is still high. Conclusion: The friggin' planes cost too much. ever-increasing potential liability in a society obsessed by frivolous litigation With insurance I just can't see this being a factor that would drive up the price of planes, and really do you suppose that many pilots find themselves as defendents? The liability is on the manufacturer and liability insurance costs big money. Ok, thanks for the clarification. Insurance companies are robber-barons. Look at the spread sheets. ( A.I.G.) So, basically, GREED is driving up the cost of planes. and the high cost of certification probably all contribute to the prices of airplanes. How so? *Yes certification is expensive but that money goes to the flight school. The airplane itself and each piece and part has to be certified. That costs the manufacturer big bucks. The certification testing of a new airplane design can take years. Reminiscent of the FDA. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark wrote:
On Sep 10, 12:23Â*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: A shrinking market, Why do you think the market is shrinking? Â*I think it's growing. Then your thinking is clouded. The market has been shrinking for a couple of decades, but I believe there is a resurgence of interest at this time. Your thoughts are not reflected by sales figures. The sales numbers are out there for anyone to see and the market is shrinking in all sectors from GA to airliners. Yes sales are off. Interest is still high. And from what market study did you get that information? The liability is on the manufacturer and liability insurance costs big money. Ok, thanks for the clarification. Insurance companies are robber-barons. Look at the spread sheets. ( A.I.G.) So, basically, GREED is driving up the cost of planes. Nope, basically a litigious society winning suites for airplanes built over two decades ago are driving up the cost of planes and driving parts makers out of business. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 10, 7:53*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote: On Sep 10, 12:23*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: A shrinking market, Why do you think the market is shrinking? *I think it's growing. Then your thinking is clouded. The market has been shrinking for a couple of decades, but I believe there is a resurgence of interest at this time. Your thoughts are not reflected by sales figures. Yes, and you want to know why? Because the planes are overpriced. The sales numbers are out there for anyone to see and the market is shrinking in all sectors from GA to airliners. Yes sales are off. *Interest is still high. And from what market study did you get that information? It's a culmulative understanding from multiple sources, and partially driven by baby boomers who now have interest in the LSA market. I've also been to 3 different flight schools in the last year, and reading extensively from AOPA and other sources. Yes it's my opinion, and I find it trivial to dig up hard numbers. Market studies are usually agenda driven. The liability is on the manufacturer and liability insurance costs big money. Ok, thanks for the clarification. Insurance companies are robber-barons. *Look at the spread sheets. *( A.I.G.) *So, basically, GREED is driving up the cost of planes. Nope, basically a litigious society winning suites for airplanes built over two decades ago are driving up the cost of planes and driving parts makers out of business. So you're saying tort reform would entice companies like Arion aircraft and Piper sport to stop asking 135,000.00? Heh. Thanks for your input Jim. I'll look into it. --- Mark -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark wrote:
On Sep 10, 7:53Â*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: On Sep 10, 12:23Â*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: A shrinking market, Why do you think the market is shrinking? Â*I think it's growing. Then your thinking is clouded. The market has been shrinking for a couple of decades, but I believe there is a resurgence of interest at this time. Your thoughts are not reflected by sales figures. Yes, and you want to know why? Because the planes are overpriced. No, it is because most people have no interest what so ever in owning an airplane and in fact a very large number of people are scared of "little" airplanes. Yes sales are off. Â*Interest is still high. And from what market study did you get that information? It's a culmulative understanding from multiple sources, and partially driven by baby boomers who now have interest in the LSA market. Mostly because the operating costs are low and you don't need to be able to pass a medical. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 10, 9:30*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote: On Sep 10, 7:53*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: On Sep 10, 12:23*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: A shrinking market, Why do you think the market is shrinking? *I think it's growing. Then your thinking is clouded. The market has been shrinking for a couple of decades, but I believe there is a resurgence of interest at this time. Your thoughts are not reflected by sales figures. Yes, and you want to know why? *Because the planes are overpriced. No, it is because most people have no interest what so ever in owning an airplane and in fact a very large number of people are scared of "little" airplanes. Yes sales are off. *Interest is still high. And from what market study did you get that information? It's a culmulative understanding from multiple sources, and partially driven by baby boomers who now have interest in the LSA market. Mostly because the operating costs are low and you don't need to be able to pass a medical. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. I wrote something about this a while ago, paraphrasing here I use general aviation a lot, and own a Mooney built 30 some years ago. I think the opportunities for general aviation have been going down, as measured by the size of the fleet, the number of pilots, and hours flown -- all generally available information -- since about the 70s. Fuel costs will keep rising, the demand for oil products is overtaking overtaking supply, increased regulation will add artificial costs that have to paid for with real dollars, and the need for physical travel will probably decline with increasing digital communication. I see this happening now -- decision makers that I used to visit are happier to take a virtual meeting than a real one, and the coming generation is better at that kind of communication than we are. A for electric airplanes, it's going to be a long time before anything weighing 6 pounds and occupying 231 cubic inches will hold the amount of easily controlled energy a gallon of av-gas does. OK, think like a manager. Do a strategic plan. We start with a SWOT analysis -- strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Do you hear of any venture capitalists lining up to invest in general aviation? It's a weak and declining market, the threats are commercial aviation and digital communications, virtual travel. The strength for non hobby SEL is, economic door to door travel time in the 200 to say 700 or 900 mile range is probably faster in an M20J than other methods. The door to door time means deciding when to travel on your own schedule, not an airline's. That also means if a business meeting ends early or late, I can still be wheels up 15 minutes after getting to the airport, and I can use an outlier airport if it's closer to where I'm going. And the opportunity? When companies like Mooney and Cessna and the like, managed by people whose careers depend on being on top of things, are struggling, there simply isn't much opportunity. I'm not going to bother looking it up, but would probably bet the average in use SEL general aviation airplane is at least 25 years old. If true that does not say much for the state of the art, does it? I can hear my grand children, in an oil poor world a couple of decades from now, saying "Granddad A, you flew your own airplane? Why?" |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 10, 9:30*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote: On Sep 10, 7:53*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: On Sep 10, 12:23*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: A shrinking market, Why do you think the market is shrinking? *I think it's growing. Then your thinking is clouded. The market has been shrinking for a couple of decades, but I believe there is a resurgence of interest at this time. Your thoughts are not reflected by sales figures. Yes, and you want to know why? *Because the planes are overpriced. No, it is because most people have no interest what so ever in owning an airplane and in fact a very large number of people are scared of "little" airplanes. So you're saying the decline in aviation sales is due to: 1) fear 2) lack of interest I won't implore you to provide a "market survey" to cooberate your opinion but my opinion is that general aviation is simply pricing itself out of business. Yes sales are off. *Interest is still high. And from what market study did you get that information? It's a culmulative understanding from multiple sources, and partially driven by baby boomers who now have interest in the LSA market. Mostly because the operating costs are low and you don't need to be able to pass a medical. I agree 100% --- Mark -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark wrote:
On Sep 10, 9:30Â*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: On Sep 10, 7:53Â*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: On Sep 10, 12:23Â*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: A shrinking market, Why do you think the market is shrinking? Â*I think it's growing. Then your thinking is clouded. The market has been shrinking for a couple of decades, but I believe there is a resurgence of interest at this time. Your thoughts are not reflected by sales figures. Yes, and you want to know why? Â*Because the planes are overpriced. No, it is because most people have no interest what so ever in owning an airplane and in fact a very large number of people are scared of "little" airplanes. So you're saying the decline in aviation sales is due to: 1) fear 2) lack of interest No I'm saying the general public, most people, the mass market, has no interest in owning an airplane. Sales are shrinking mostly because we are in an economic downturn, not because airplanes are "overpriced", whatever that means. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark writes:
So you're saying tort reform would entice companies like Arion aircraft and Piper sport to stop asking 135,000.00? It would reduce prices somewhat, just as it induced manufacturers to start building private airplanes again after liability crises some years ago. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark wrote:
So you're saying tort reform would entice companies like Arion aircraft and Piper sport to stop asking 135,000.00? Um, the Arion Lightning is available for just under US$94k.[1] It can be flown at 138 mph to any airfield in the U.S. A 2010 Aston Martin Rapide has a list price of US$200k. A 2010 Dodge Viper has a list price of US$91k. The fastest either of those two sports cars can be driven on highways in the U.S. is 80 mph.[3] A Sonex aircraft (low wing, two person, metal construction) could be built for under US$40k and be flown at 170 mph to any airfield in the U.S. A 2010 Porsche Boxster has a list price of US$48k and is limited to 80 mph (and typically less) on U.S. roads. The limiting factor of airplanes is that they only take you from one airfield to another. Ground transportation is needed at both ends. This is, in my view, the aspect that limits the utility of airplanes. [1] http://www.flylightning.net/images/p...ht%20Sport.pdf [2] http://www.automotive.com/new-cars/p...rts/index.html [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_l..._United_States [4] http://www.sonexaircraft.com/aircraft/sonex.html [5] http://www.sonexaircraft.com/kits/pricing.html |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 11, 3:06*pm, Jim Logajan wrote:
Mark wrote: So you're saying tort reform would entice companies like Arion aircraft *and Piper sport to stop asking 135,000.00? Um, the Arion Lightning is available for just under US$94k.[1] It can be flown at 138 mph to any airfield in the U.S. A 2010 Aston Martin Rapide has a list price of US$200k. A 2010 Dodge Viper has a list price of US$91k. The fastest either of those two sports cars can be driven on highways in the U.S. is 80 mph.[3] A Sonex aircraft (low wing, two person, metal construction) could be built for under US$40k and be flown at 170 mph to any airfield in the U.S. A 2010 Porsche Boxster has a list price of US$48k and is limited to 80 mph (and typically less) on U.S. roads. The limiting factor of airplanes is that they only take you from one airfield to another. Ground transportation is needed at both ends. This is, in my view, the aspect that limits the utility of airplanes. [1]http://www.flylightning.net/images/pdf/2009%20Price%20Sheet%20Light%2.... [2]http://www.automotive.com/new-cars/pricing/27/sports/index.html [3]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_limits_in_the_United_States [4]http://www.sonexaircraft.com/aircraft/sonex.html [5]http://www.sonexaircraft.com/kits/pricing.html I'm not sure why you've listed expensive autos here. Look at the KIA sorento. For 20K you can get this vehicle which looks very nice inside and out. (yes, I know...autos, mass production, etc) http://www.bing.com/autos/search?yea...re nto+prices Or more for my tastes, the Ford F-250 Super Duty often lists (decked out) near 60K, but you can pick them up all day long (used) for 22K. What "grinds my gears" is the fact that planes used to be accessable to middle class America and now even the most rudimentary planes (usually a pre-owned home built) cost double what a very nice auto does. If the reasons are research and development, certification, liability, and interest to investors, well this wasn't a big problem during the 70's and '80's. Planes were 5 times cheaper. In other news: You can have a rental car waiting for you in my area for a little over 20 bucks. That's negligible if you don't do it every day. However I just bought one of these, and I love it: http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/story/fx/ --- Mark |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AV gas prices | Stuart & Kathryn Fields | Home Built | 54 | June 5th 08 04:58 PM |
| AV gas prices | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | May 7th 08 06:41 AM |
| AV gas prices | BradGuth | Home Built | 0 | May 6th 08 03:29 AM |
| Ford Tri-Motor ground handling in FS2004 is ridiculous. | Bass | Simulators | 3 | December 19th 04 09:37 PM |
| soaring high w/ ridiculous knowledge | The Admiral | Soaring | 0 | December 3rd 04 08:34 PM |