![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Phone call to John got answer as 74300 Euro UH Now let's talk benefits. our club (chicago glider) bought a brand new ASK21 last year. The thing is gorgeous. It flies much more nicely than the other ASK21 in our club (much older). Controls are crisp, handling great, and it's a pleasure to give rides in a nice new glider.Get and use the spin weights too. John Cochrane |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kirk,
Buy new PW-6. In most respects as good as K-21 . For the money you'll save you can add a couple of used PW-5. Great set for any Club. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 21, 8:53*pm, RRK wrote:
Kirk, Buy new PW-6. In most respects as good as K-21 . For the money you'll save you can add a couple of used PW-5. Great set for any Club. I've flown both and while the PW-6 is a very nice glider, it's not in the same league as the ASK-21. The two ASK-21's I fly are 30 years old having led a hard life with the USAFA and CAP but they still look almost new with barely any cracks in the gelcoat. ASK-21's are RUGGED! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 21, 11:57*pm, bildan wrote:
I've flown both and while the PW-6 is a very nice glider, it's not in the same league as the ASK-21. "bildan" would you elaborate a little bit more on your's opinion. You stated that PW-6 is in the different league than K-21. Why? Since you flown both of them, I'm sure it will be easy to justified you conclusion. Could you share it with us ? Please. RRK |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 23, 12:53*am, RRK wrote:
On Oct 21, 11:57*pm, bildan wrote: I've flown both and while the PW-6 is a very nice glider, it's not in the same league as the ASK-21. "bildan" * * * * * * * would you elaborate a little bit more on your's opinion. You stated that *PW-6 is in the different league than K-21. Why? Since you flown both of them, *I'm sure it will be easy to justified you conclusion. Could you share it with us ? Please. RRK It's just my humble opinion. To me the ASK-21 feels more solid, more rugged. The ASK-21's larger wing seems to hold on to weak lift better and the controls are better harmonized. The 21's cockpit is bigger. I love the docile stall behavior. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks to all the replies - both online and direct. Now comes the
hard part - convincing the old guard that it's time to retire the 2-33 and move on. As far as the suggestion to get a motorglider - not interested. It may be the perfect plane for some people & clubs, but not for ours. I've considered the PW-6 and looked at one (did not get to fly it, unfortunately) and it's an interesting little glider - second on my list. I confess to a lot of time in K-21s, including giving commercial acro rides, and really like the way it flies. And it's a tough ship - far stronger than the Grob 103, IMO. Again, thanks for the feedback; hopefully at some time in the future I'll be able to report the purchase of a new glider... Kirk 66 |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 23, 10:54*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
Thanks to all the replies - both online and direct. *Now comes the hard part - convincing the old guard that it's time to retire the 2-33 and move on. As far as the suggestion to get a motorglider - not interested. *It may be the perfect plane for some people & clubs, but not for ours. I've considered the PW-6 and looked at one (did not get to fly it, unfortunately) and it's an interesting little glider - second on my list. *I confess to a lot of time in K-21s, including giving commercial acro rides, and really like the way it flies. *And it's a tough ship - far stronger than the Grob 103, IMO. Again, thanks for the feedback; hopefully at some time in the future I'll be able to report the purchase of a new glider... Kirk 66 Last point. Often on ras people say that the 21 is a bad trainer because it can't stall or spin properly. The answer is, get the spin weights. I took ours out last weekend for spinning. (When giving a BFR, do something fun for the instructor!) With the spin weights on, it stalls and spins beautifully. With the spin weights off, the solo student is much less likely to get in trouble. The spin weights hang out in the breeze where you can't possibly fail to notice them. John Cochrane |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 23, 9:54*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
Thanks to all the replies - both online and direct. *Now comes the hard part - convincing the old guard that it's time to retire the 2-33 and move on. It's really inevitable. Whether it's an onerous AD or just members moving to clubs with better gliders, the 2-33's days are numbered. The trick is not to be the guys holding the bag when the 2-33 is grounded like the unfortunate L-13 owners. One ding or bit of corrosion in an unobtanium wing strut grounds a 2-33 - probably forever. The smart folks are moving on. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 10/23/2010 11:54 AM, kirk.stant wrote:
Thanks to all the replies - both online and direct. Now comes the hard part - convincing the old guard that it's time to retire the 2-33 and move on. As far as the suggestion to get a motorglider - not interested. It may be the perfect plane for some people& clubs, but not for ours. I've considered the PW-6 and looked at one (did not get to fly it, unfortunately) and it's an interesting little glider - second on my list. I confess to a lot of time in K-21s, including giving commercial acro rides, and really like the way it flies. And it's a tough ship - far stronger than the Grob 103, IMO. Again, thanks for the feedback; hopefully at some time in the future I'll be able to report the purchase of a new glider... Kirk 66 The other thing I would consider is fleet commonality. Not only does this simplify maintenance, but it is also a safety issue. The typical club pilot only flies maybe 10-20 flights per season. If you have a variety of different ships, and members fly them randomly, a pilot will never be really current in the plane he/she is flying. There's a big plus to always having all the controls and instruments in the same location when you get into trouble. -- Mike Schumann |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 23, 10:33*am, bildan wrote:
On Oct 23, 12:53*am, RRK wrote: On Oct 21, 11:57*pm, bildan wrote: I've flown both and while the PW-6 is a very nice glider, it's not in the same league as the ASK-21. "bildan" * * * * * * * would you elaborate a little bit more on your's opinion. You stated that *PW-6 is in the different league than K-21. Why? Since you flown both of them, *I'm sure it will be easy to justified you conclusion. Could you share it with us ? Please. RRK It's just my humble opinion. *To me the ASK-21 feels more solid, more rugged. *The ASK-21's larger wing seems to hold on to weak lift better and the controls are better harmonized. *The 21's cockpit is bigger. I love the docile stall behavior. Another factor is the rear cockpit. We (TSA) evaluated a PW-6 early on (2003?). Most instructors disliked the rear cockpit. It very much felt like an afterthought: cramped, poor forward visibility and communication with the front-seater because of the tall instrument panel. We now own three ASK-21's. They earn their keep. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|