![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our regular glider DPE asks me to fan my rudder at 1000 feet AGL
during a checkride to see if the glider pilot candidate understands what the signal means. We do it at 1000 feet close in to the field so that if he mistakenly releases, he can make a normal pattern and land. Our instructors are good at ensuring glider students get to see the rudder wag and the waveoff during their training. Radios are primary for communicating between the glider and towplane but the battery in the glider is subject to petering out so the visual signals are there as a backup. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What Gary said… Flying a glider without direct tow plane radio
communication is sheer foolishness. With today’s radio/battery technology, or at minimum a handheld w/ PTT, there is zero excuse for not having every glider and tow plane equipped with a radio. We would never allow a glider to launch from our airport without a working radio and contact with the towplane. In the case of open dive brakes, the often misinterpreted and ambiguous rudder waggle becomes replaced by a simple radio call and the problem goes away with no guessing on either end of the string. There is little chance the FAA will address the issue, so here’s a controversial thought… maybe we should encourage insurance companies to “adjust” their rates based on having a radio on board… that will get the anti-progress crowd fired up! Bob |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 22, 9:01*am, RL wrote:
What Gary said… Flying a glider without direct tow plane radio communication is sheer foolishness. With today’s radio/battery technology, or at minimum a handheld w/ PTT, there is zero excuse for not having every glider and tow plane equipped with a radio. *We would never allow a glider to launch from our airport without a working radio and contact with the towplane. In the case of open dive brakes, the often misinterpreted and ambiguous rudder waggle becomes replaced by a simple radio call and the problem goes away with no guessing on either end of the string. There is little chance the FAA will address the issue, so here’s a controversial thought… maybe we should encourage insurance companies to “adjust” their rates based on having a radio on board… that will get the anti-progress crowd fired up! Bob I don't disagree with RL in any way. However, AM simplex aviation radio is an anachronism dating from before WW2 which has real limitations. Every procedure in aviation has backups for radio communication failure including tower light signals and IFR communications failures among others. We're no different. For aviation radio to work it must be: 1. Turned on. (Battery charged) 2. Set to right frequency. 3. Squelch set correctly. 4. Volume set correctly. 5. Selected frequency free of interfering radio traffic - including that from the station you're trying to contact. There's a lot of room for radio communications to fail in a critical moment. Even with radios, we still need the rudder wag signal as a backup - and pilots have to know it. If you don't, you're going to bust your next checkride or Flight Review. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 22, 9:53*am, Bill D wrote:
On Jul 22, 9:01*am, RL wrote: What Gary said… Flying a glider without direct tow plane radio communication is sheer foolishness. With today’s radio/battery technology, or at minimum a handheld w/ PTT, there is zero excuse for not having every glider and tow plane equipped with a radio. *We would never allow a glider to launch from our airport without a working radio and contact with the towplane. In the case of open dive brakes, the often misinterpreted and ambiguous rudder waggle becomes replaced by a simple radio call and the problem goes away with no guessing on either end of the string. There is little chance the FAA will address the issue, so here’s a controversial thought… maybe we should encourage insurance companies to “adjust” their rates based on having a radio on board… that will get the anti-progress crowd fired up! Bob I don't disagree with RL in any way. *However, AM simplex aviation radio is an anachronism dating from before WW2 which has real limitations. *Every procedure in aviation has backups for radio communication failure including tower light signals and IFR communications failures among others. *We're no different. For aviation radio to work it must be: 1. Turned on. (Battery charged) 2. Set to right frequency. 3. Squelch set correctly. 4. Volume set correctly. 5. Selected frequency free of interfering radio traffic - including that from the station you're trying to contact. There's a lot of room for radio communications to fail in a critical moment. *Even with radios, we still need the rudder wag signal as a backup - and pilots have to know it. *If you don't, you're going to bust your next checkride or Flight Review. There is no excuse for gliders or tow planes not to have radios but that will never be infallible and here is also no excuse for tow and glider pilots not to be proficient with the signals. I'd hope the radio is always the tool of first use however. But to emphasize the radio does have limitations I'll add these issues - o Properly installed with a good well positioned speaker or use of a headset. o Environmental noise appropriately managed (e.g. noisy side vents that an interfere with listening). (Bumper's quiet vent kit helps if you want to keep the vent scoop open on tow). o Audio conflicts in the cockpit e.g. passenger/co-pilot/instructor speaking at the same time. o Use of confusing speech/phraseology, so even if the message is heard it is not quickly understood. Whats are tow pilots expected to say on the radio if spoilers appear deployed where you fly? --- I'd like to always see careful use even of the radio e.g. tow to a safe location/altitude if at all possible if spoilers are deployed - before even using the radio which in itself could cause confusion and a unintended release. And when made make it a very clear radio call with the glider call-sign and "check spoilers" If that fails then rudder waggle. Darryl |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Did they not have radios? *Over the years I have collected many stories of accidents that almost happened and at some point during the story I have to add, "Oh, and back then we did not have radios." Every glider should have a radio and a PPT on the stick! Boggs A couple of gliders I've flown were so noisy I couldn't even understand my handheld. I turned it off, it was functioning only as a noisy distraction. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 22, 5:55*am, Pat Russell wrote:
The towplane rudder waggle signal has done more harm than good. *We have spent at least ten years trying to educate our pilots about this signal, and we have failed. *It is time we got rid of the signal. http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/br...15X11650&key=1 -Pat Almost the same thing happened at Minden a few years back, with the same results......one dead, one seriously injured! Time to ALL get radios and use them! My best friend collided with a tow plane in the pattern..................the tow ship didn't have a radio, so he didn't hear that a glider was trying to land on the same runway at the same time! Refuse to take a tow with a tug that isn't equipped with a working radio and do a quick 'com-check', before hooking up to your tug. We all know what can (will) go wrong: Dead battery, Wrong frequency, Squelch not set, Radio not on. Klem Bowman died because he was on the wrong frequency! Don't wait for the FAA or SSA to do something, they probably will never get the message. It's your life, act accordingly. JJ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 22, 5:55*am, Pat Russell wrote:
The towplane rudder waggle signal has done more harm than good. *We have spent at least ten years trying to educate our pilots about this signal, and we have failed. *It is time we got rid of the signal. http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/br...15X11650&key=1 -Pat Worked for me, shortly after taking off from Crystal several years ago the tow plane waggled his rudder, looking at the wings I noticed spoilers open. No radios there but I agree that this is the 21st century and radio communication is cheap now. Now if he had of rocked his wings that means get off or I'm going to dump you. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 22, 8:55*am, Pat Russell wrote:
The towplane rudder waggle signal has done more harm than good. *We have spent at least ten years trying to educate our pilots about this signal, and we have failed. *It is time we got rid of the signal. http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/br...15X11650&key=1 -Pat maybe it doesn't work because it's never taught, except out of a book. I've never seen this practiced anywhere, ever. I suggest CFIG instruct student to open spoilers on tow at safe altitude (smoothly, please), tow pilot (briefed ahead of time) gives the rudder wag when he notices. We practice wave offs from time to time, we can do this too. Radios are good. Reliance on the radio is foolish. They are by far the most unreliable pieces of equipment we use. -Evan Ludeman / T8 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 22, 9:28*am, T8 wrote:
On Jul 22, 8:55*am, Pat Russell wrote: The towplane rudder waggle signal has done more harm than good. *We have spent at least ten years trying to educate our pilots about this signal, and we have failed. *It is time we got rid of the signal. http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/br...15X11650&key=1 -Pat maybe it doesn't work because it's never taught, except out of a book. I've never seen this practiced anywhere, ever. *I suggest CFIG instruct student to open spoilers on tow at safe altitude (smoothly, please), tow pilot (briefed ahead of time) gives the rudder wag when he notices. *We practice wave offs from time to time, we can do this too. Radios are good. *Reliance on the radio is foolish. *They are by far the most unreliable pieces of equipment we use. -Evan Ludeman / T8 Repeating what I wrote in the other thread: Folks, the problem is not just lack of knowledge or practice, it is the human nature of confusion and tunnel vision under stress! Imagine you are on tow and barely climbing (since your spoilers are out), your first thought is that something is wrong with the tow plane, and once you see the tow pilot waggle the rudder (which may also cause the wings to rock a little), I bet over 90% of pilots will release, even if they just practiced this manuver a week ago. There are many examples confirming this, luckily not all of them resulted in accidents. Bottom line: Use radios! If this doesn't work, do not waggle rudders until at safe altitude, unless the tow plane can not climb at all. Ramy |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the standard and enforced use of signals is the best way all
around. Too many times when things get busy, radios or mikes are dropped, misplaced, tuned off frequency or you name it. Too many clubs start introducing their own idiosyncratic signals. Standardize them. But what do I know? MSL seems logical to me, but some insist on AGL. Sometimes when reading these threads, especially if one is an infrequent follower, one comes away with the impression, "I'm glad I'm not flying with him" followed very quickly with "I'm glad he's not flying with me". Lots of emotion out there. Leave the FAA out of things. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rudder waggle | toad | Soaring | 33 | November 21st 07 05:44 AM |
DG Rudder AD - DONE! - Notes from my work | ContestID67 | Soaring | 0 | March 30th 06 07:36 PM |
CH Rudder pedals, why don't they work | wan2fly99 | Simulators | 2 | January 12th 06 12:30 PM |
signal splitter | Tri-Pacer | Home Built | 2 | November 5th 05 09:47 PM |