Disclosure Imminent? Eight + Underground NWO Bases Destroyed?

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having one
doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0500, Dan wrote:

On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having one
doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I've had several for several USAF, NSA and CIA projects including "Q"
and subsections of TS.

I fail to see the point you are making.

On 10/8/2011 3:53 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0500, Dan wrote:

On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having one
doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I've had several for several USAF, NSA and CIA projects including "Q"
and subsections of TS.

I fail to see the point you are making.

OK, since it is obvious you have never actually held a clearance I
will keep it simple. If person A and person B each hold an identical
clearance but work for different activities A doesn't have a need to
know what B is doing.

BTW, there's no such thing as a USAF clearance. The confidential,
secret and top secret clearances are DOD.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0500, Dan wrote:

On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there
will be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for
more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason
not to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered
years later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having
one doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I've had several for several USAF, NSA and CIA projects including "Q"
and subsections of TS.


Bull**** , if you had a security clearance at any level you would
recognize why.

Keith

On Oct 8, 2:53*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0500, Dan wrote:
On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

* *If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having one
doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I've had several for several USAF, NSA and CIA projects including "Q"
and subsections of TS.

I fail to see the point you are making.-

Then you know that George Lucas, Steven Spielberg, Madonna and many
others are not from earth, they are running the CIA and all
intelligence operations, which means staging PSYOPs and also control
all flying saucer space flight, the huge secret arsenal of technology
acquired from the 3rd Reich which is light years beyond all admitted
technology that NASA claims to have.

Disclosure is a must, you know Bob Lazar & Steve Greer are the same
individual, an Alpha Centaurian, who morphs the different body style
(Steven Greer a bodybuilder).

You guys got all these secret clearances lets make sure you don't
forget you're obliged to serve the common people namely the American
public.

Make disclosure happen...

In article 4ec11d49-36cf-4d78-b1fd-3c6790ccd6b1
@u24g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, - LIBERATOR spouted !
You guys got all these secret clearances lets make sure you don't
forget you're obliged to serve the common people namely the American
public.

Make disclosure happen...

Well..
Nothing in the files about aliens..
Lots of stuff about kooks who think aliens control the CIA...

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 02:21:46 -0700 (PDT), LIBERATOR wrote:

On Oct 8, 2:53*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0500, Dan wrote:
On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

* *If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having one
doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I've had several for several USAF, NSA and CIA projects including "Q"
and subsections of TS.

I fail to see the point you are making.-

Then you know that George Lucas, Steven Spielberg, Madonna and many
others are not from earth,

No I do not know this.

they are running the CIA and all intelligence operations, which means
staging PSYOPs and also control all flying saucer space flight, the
huge secret arsenal of technology acquired from the 3rd Reich which
is light years beyond all admitted technology that NASA claims to
have.

Neither this.

Disclosure is a must, you know Bob Lazar & Steve Greer are the same
individual, an Alpha Centaurian, who morphs the different body style
(Steven Greer a bodybuilder).

Neither this.

You guys got all these secret clearances lets make sure you don't
forget you're obliged to serve the common people namely the American
public.

Make disclosure happen...

The people who have MAGIC or equivalent clearances are very unlikely to
do much of anything. The few who have (Dan Crain/Burnisch et al) face a
"pull of the root".

Where we differ is in "knowing". I have many possibilities which
include parts of what you claim nothing of what you claim and most often
I choose mixes of what you claim appended with other possibilities.

What we don't appear to share is the acknowledgment that the
intellectual prowess..of ETs, NASA, military, intelligence
agencies...far exceeds our imagination. Why then would we expect to know
with certainty what it is they have accomplished or on their agenda?

On Oct 8, 3:41*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base surely they've been in there. Let's go together
with a camera to take pictures.

I mean they have to know this stuff somehow, so surely they have GPS
locations, pictures, etc. of these supposed secret bases.

Heck if we have satellite coordinates or GPS stuff Google Earth will
be our initial recon.

Please post GPS coordinates of these base complexes, we should be able
to see surface features or if collapsed a sunken area where the earth
or bunker caved in.

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:05:30 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

On Oct 8, 3:41*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base surely they've been in there.

No they have made it very clear that their information is not onsite.
Read the article.