![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the inputs. I currently have:
Minolta 35-105 f3.5-4.5 ProSpec 28-70 f3.5-4.5 ProSpec 75-300 f4.5-5.6 He's now given them to me officially, which takes some pressure off replacing them and returning them to him. So looks like a 70-200 something in a quality lens would probably be the first one to buy, and that's helpful. Generally, looking at airshow type shots, both static displays and flybys. Here at the Grass Valley airport, one cannot get too close to the runway along which most flybys occur, but one can get fairly close to the taxiway. And in the static displays, close enough to touch for the most part. I do understand the cost/quality issue. It's not that I am a cheap tightwad, but probably not going to be buying $1000 lenses anytime soon unless I find a screaming deal on a CZ 16-35... I'm moving to Australia next year and struggling to come up with the $20k it'll take to move my machine shop and pay immigration fees. But stuff like this is cheaper to buy and have shipped here, so want to get a good basic kit together before I move. Jon |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jon, Don't forget that Sony still also uses older Minolta lenses. You might be able to get some good deals on used Minolta lenses at your local photography shop. Make sure the autofocus works. A friend of mine got an excellent 50mm f1.4 for about $50.00. He also purchased a newer Sony 70-300 G Series lens for around $900.00. It is very sharp. Good Luck, Oldman On Sun, 22 May 2011 09:59:12 -0800, Jon Anderson wrote: After years of dreaming and lusting, I finally have a quality camera, a Sony A700. Bought the body only, but my brother has loaned me several lenses until I can get my own. My overall interests are scenery and closeup (flowers, insects, etc). But I'm also quite interested in taking great photos of airplanes, static and in the air. I don't have a lot of money to blow on fancy lenses. And boy in looking around, cameras are like a Bridgeport mill. Machine itself may not be cheap, but tooling up to make it useful is where the money really is... But this group inspires me, and so I thought I'd inquire here. So looking for recommendations on some good basic lenses. Zooms are a given, but also quite open to fixed focal. And, any sites to recommend with tips on getting good aviation shots? Looking forward to finally taking shots worthy of sharing here. Thank you, Jon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/25/2011 3:12 AM, oldman wrote:
Don't forget that Sony still also uses older Minolta lenses. You might be able to get some good deals on used Minolta lenses at your local photography shop. Make sure the autofocus works. A friend of mine got an excellent 50mm f1.4 for about $50.00. He also purchased a newer Sony 70-300 G Series lens for around $900.00. It is very sharp. Yeah, looking into that too. One lens I really want is a 100mm true macro. They are not cheap, but just found a Minolta 100mm Macro w/1:1 tube, and MD mount. Looks like I can get an adapter for around $30. For this type of close up, not having auto focus doesn't seem like a bad thing, but for other lenses, I would want direct compatible mounts w/AF. I'm even looking at entire camera kits. With patience and luck, just might bag a couple useful lenses, filters, and a bag in one shot, for what a lens alone might cost. I've seen a few go for under $50. I did get sorta wowed by AF, never had a film camera with that feature. But really, unless it's a moving subject, I'm perfectly capable of doing that myself. But it sure is nice having all the other features of the digital age! Thank you, Jon |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 25 May 2011 10:00:23 -0800, Jon Anderson
wrote: On 5/25/2011 3:12 AM, oldman wrote: Don't forget that Sony still also uses older Minolta lenses. You might be able to get some good deals on used Minolta lenses at your local photography shop. Make sure the autofocus works. A friend of mine got an excellent 50mm f1.4 for about $50.00. He also purchased a newer Sony 70-300 G Series lens for around $900.00. It is very sharp. Yeah, looking into that too. One lens I really want is a 100mm true macro. They are not cheap, but just found a Minolta 100mm Macro w/1:1 tube, and MD mount. Looks like I can get an adapter for around $30. For this type of close up, not having auto focus doesn't seem like a bad thing, but for other lenses, I would want direct compatible mounts w/AF. I'm even looking at entire camera kits. With patience and luck, just might bag a couple useful lenses, filters, and a bag in one shot, for what a lens alone might cost. I've seen a few go for under $50. I did get sorta wowed by AF, never had a film camera with that feature. But really, unless it's a moving subject, I'm perfectly capable of doing that myself. But it sure is nice having all the other features of the digital age! I believe 'oldman' was specifically referring to the Minolta Maxxum/Dynax line of AF lenses, which are compatible with the Sony AF mount. Most of my lens collection dates back to the early 1990s and even a couple from the first Maxxum 7000 from 1985. All work fine with my current Sony. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/25/2011 2:25 PM, Bob (not my real pseudonym) wrote:
I believe 'oldman' was specifically referring to the Minolta Maxxum/Dynax line of AF lenses, which are compatible with the Sony AF mount. Yes, I knew that, and I'm watching several on ebay. But my brother had also talked about using an adapter with the older MD lenses which can often be had real cheap. No AF, and a few other compromises, but for macro work, that's not an issue. Wouldn't use MD mount lenses to shoot action or just walking around taking pictures. And, the airshow is in Grass Valley this year (they alternate every with nearby Auburn). My brother might come up for this. With his help and advise I should get some shots worthy of posting! Jon |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 25 May 2011 22:10:20 -0800, Jon Anderson
wrote: On 5/25/2011 2:25 PM, Bob (not my real pseudonym) wrote: I believe 'oldman' was specifically referring to the Minolta Maxxum/Dynax line of AF lenses, which are compatible with the Sony AF mount. Yes, I knew that, and I'm watching several on ebay. But my brother had also talked about using an adapter with the older MD lenses which can often be had real cheap. No AF, and a few other compromises, but for macro work, that's not an issue. Wouldn't use MD mount lenses to shoot action or just walking around taking pictures. And, the airshow is in Grass Valley this year (they alternate every with nearby Auburn). My brother might come up for this. With his help and advise I should get some shots worthy of posting! Please share your results with us! Bob ^,,^ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Camera mounts for small digital camera | kestrel254 | Soaring | 5 | August 19th 08 04:03 PM |
Good airshow lens? | Peter.D.Evans | Aviation Photos | 27 | October 30th 07 01:08 AM |
right place, wrong lens.... | Tom Callahan | Aviation Photos | 1 | May 2nd 07 01:27 AM |
Contact lens and medical | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 37 | December 17th 06 10:25 PM |
Aviation Through A Lens Part 2 | Jay Beckman | Piloting | 6 | January 19th 06 03:26 PM |