![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
So, by then, the B-17 crews had figured out that high altitude level
bombing of moving ships wasn't working out very well? Did anyone ever try equipping the B-17 with torpedoes? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 3, 1:18*am, Bill Shatzer wrote:
wrote: So, by then, the B-17 crews had figured out that high altitude level bombing of moving ships wasn't working out very well? Did anyone ever try equipping the B-17 with torpedoes? Well, sorta. http://tinyurl.com/7sr3lmu Thank you! If this was 1940 than this stuff is huge! It's huge either way, but wow! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 03/04/2012 17:49, David E. Powell wrote:
On Apr 3, 1:18 am, Bill wrote: wrote: So, by then, the B-17 crews had figured out that high altitude level bombing of moving ships wasn't working out very well? Did anyone ever try equipping the B-17 with torpedoes? Well, sorta. http://tinyurl.com/7sr3lmu Thank you! If this was 1940 than this stuff is huge! It's huge either way, but wow! The GT-1 does not seem to have been tested until 1943, so the caption has to be wrong. The British Toraplane, a similar air launched gliding torpedo was around in 1940*, but, of course, that would not have been launched from a B-17. * Work started in 1939 but was abandoned in 1942, as it proved to be very inaccurate. Colin Bignell |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Nightjar" wrote in message ... On 03/04/2012 17:49, David E. Powell wrote: On Apr 3, 1:18 am, Bill wrote: wrote: So, by then, the B-17 crews had figured out that high altitude level bombing of moving ships wasn't working out very well? Did anyone ever try equipping the B-17 with torpedoes? Well, sorta. http://tinyurl.com/7sr3lmu Thank you! If this was 1940 than this stuff is huge! It's huge either way, but wow! The GT-1 does not seem to have been tested until 1943, so the caption has to be wrong. The British Toraplane, a similar air launched gliding torpedo was around in 1940*, but, of course, that would not have been launched from a B-17. * Work started in 1939 but was abandoned in 1942, as it proved to be very inaccurate. Colin Bignell A field-expedient PBY torpedo attack from Guadalcanal: http://www.daveswarbirds.com/cactus/jackcram.htm jsw |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 6, 2:37*am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote:
"Nightjar" wrote in message ... On 03/04/2012 17:49, David E. Powell wrote: On Apr 3, 1:18 am, Bill *wrote: wrote: So, by then, the B-17 crews had figured out that high altitude level bombing of moving ships wasn't working out very well? Did anyone ever try equipping the B-17 with torpedoes? Well, sorta. http://tinyurl.com/7sr3lmu Thank you! If this was 1940 than this stuff is huge! It's huge either way, but wow! The GT-1 does not seem to have been tested until 1943, so the caption has to be wrong. The British Toraplane, a similar air launched gliding torpedo was around in 1940*, but, of course, that would not have been launched from a B-17. * Work started in 1939 but was abandoned in 1942, as it proved to be very inaccurate. Colin Bignell A field-expedient PBY torpedo attack from Guadalcanal:http://www.daveswarbirds.com/cactus/jackcram.htm For decades, we had a docent taking tickets at our front desk that kept a photo nearby of his "Black Cat" following a successful mission - they were hit on their run and a shell carried away one of their props, narrowly missing the cockpit as it careened on by with a roar. Already committed, the pilot got his bombs off and accounted for a troop ship with his single-engine Catalina. Just a little reminder that men that go to war in elegant, pedestrian seaplanes are just a little different than most. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
-"Gordon" wrote -For decades, we had a docent taking tickets at our front desk that -kept a photo nearby of his "Black Cat" following a successful mission -- they were hit on their run and a shell carried away one of their -props, narrowly missing the cockpit as it careened on by with a roar. -Already committed, the pilot got his bombs off and accounted for a -troop ship with his single-engine Catalina. Just a little reminder -that men that go to war in elegant, pedestrian seaplanes are just a -little different than most. I'm impressed that they patrolled for reported (MAGIC) enemy carriers, trusting their lives to their ability to hide from the CAP in whatever clouds they might find. jsw |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 6, 1:54*am, Nightjar wrote:
On 03/04/2012 17:49, David E. Powell wrote: On Apr 3, 1:18 am, Bill *wrote: wrote: So, by then, the B-17 crews had figured out that high altitude level bombing of moving ships wasn't working out very well? Did anyone ever try equipping the B-17 with torpedoes? Well, sorta. http://tinyurl.com/7sr3lmu Thank you! If this was 1940 than this stuff is huge! It's huge either way, but wow! The GT-1 does not seem to have been tested until 1943, so the caption has to be wrong. The British Toraplane, a similar air launched gliding torpedo was around in 1940*, but, of course, that would not have been launched from a B-17. * Work started in 1939 but was abandoned in 1942, as it proved to be very inaccurate. Colin Bignell Similar objects, (encased flying torpedos), were tried on Zeppelin L-35 (LZ-80) during secret experiments in 1918 at Jueterbog (S. of Berlin). Accuracy was said to be a problem then as well. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Airmen honor POWs, MIAs | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 21st 03 09:49 PM |