![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And if it was me
flying I wouldn't be any lower than I had to be. Right. I have read about a B-17 that had to raise a wing tip to miss a church steeple as it beat feet across Belgium egressing the continent. But since I have to mount the model on a base, it can't be more than about 20 scale feet above the ground. Walt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "WalterM140" wrote in message ... | And if it was me | flying I wouldn't be any lower than I had to be. | | Right. | | | I have read about a B-17 that had to raise a wing tip to miss a church steeple | as it beat feet across Belgium egressing the continent. But since I have to | mount the model on a base, it can't be more than about 20 scale feet above the | ground. | | Walt Sounds interesting - would love to see it when it's done. Cheers Dave Kearton |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: B-17s at Low Level
From: "Dave Kearton" Date: 3/12/04 6:12 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "WalterM140" wrote in message ... | And if it was me | flying I wouldn't be any lower than I had to be. | | Right. | | | I have read about a B-17 that had to raise a wing tip to miss a church steeple | as it beat feet across Belgium egressing the continent. But since I have to | mount the model on a base, it can't be more than about 20 scale feet above the | ground. | | Walt Sounds interesting - would love to see it when it's done. Cheers Dave Kearton For a true life description of a similiar situation go to my website and click on, the story " Little Friend Brings Big Brother home". Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When you've finished it, why not take a pic of it and send it over the web!!
I dont know wether the guys on here allow pics on this N.G. but take my e-mail addy and let me see it, i'd love a look at it!! "WalterM140" wrote in message ... Hi, I am building a diorama with a 1/48th scale B-17 at low altitude. It will have two engines turning and two shut down. My question is, would a B-17 have its landing flaps deployed at all at this lower speed and altitude if it was not landing, just hedge-hopping home? And if so, how much? Thanks, Walt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My question is, would a B-17 have its landing flaps deployed at all at this
lower speed and altitude if it was not landing, just hedge-hopping home? And if so, how much? no, the flaps on the -17 were mostly drag devices, and did not help generate lift. Matt Gunsch, A&P,IA,Private Pilot Riding member of the 2003 world champion drill team Arizona Precision Motorcycle Drill Team GWRRA,NRA,GOA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(N329DF) wrote: no, the flaps on the -17 were mostly drag devices, and did not help generate lift. Well, they help a little. Book shortfield procedure calls for 10-20 degrees of flap. Flaps do allow you to liftoff a little sooner/slower. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dale wrote:
In article , (N329DF) wrote: no, the flaps on the -17 were mostly drag devices, and did not help generate lift. Well, they help a little. Book shortfield procedure calls for 10-20 degrees of flap. Flaps do allow you to liftoff a little sooner/slower. Of course, most a/c use some flaps for takeoff but it would have only a detrimental effect (I'm pretty sure) at cruise...I know two pilots who will swear on their mothers' grave to this.... Cruising along on a 'boring holes' exercise (quite boring indeed) a couple pilots and I were discussing the possibilities of this...my position was that even a couple degrees of flap would be detrimental, one of the pilots was 'certain' that it would help, the other was undecided. We had quite a discussion going and ended up with a substantial bet between I and the sure guy, to be paid in beer at the next squadron bash. (all that one can drink - woohoo) We were at 'range power', an airspeed that produces maximum range at the particular weight. we had been there for long enough that our airspeed was stable, co-jo inched down a couple degrees of flap (very slowly and carefully) I waited a few seconds then carefully inched the cowl flaps open quite a few degrees. Airspeed slowly decreased...co-jo inched the flaps back up and I followed by inching the cowl flaps closed. We did this several times till he was convinced. (the pilots cannot see the cowl flap position gauges nor the switches which are behind them on the F/E's panel on the Argus. I never did tell them different. Fun. -- -Gord. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Gord Beaman" ) wrote: Airspeed slowly decreased...co-jo inched the flaps back up and I followed by inching the cowl flaps closed. We did this several times till he was convinced. (the pilots cannot see the cowl flap position gauges nor the switches which are behind them on the F/E's panel on the Argus. I never did tell them different. Fun. You're a baaaad boy!! G -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: B-17s at Low Level
From: Dale Date: 3/14/04 12:59 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: In article , "Gord Beaman" ) wrote: Airspeed slowly decreased...co-jo inched the flaps back up and I followed by inching the cowl flaps closed. We did this several times till he was convinced. (the pilots cannot see the cowl flap position gauges nor the switches which are behind them on the F/E's panel on the Argus. I never did tell them different. Fun. You're a baaaad boy!! G -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html I assume that this was not on a combat mission. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Horsepower required for level flight question... | BllFs6 | Home Built | 17 | March 30th 04 12:18 AM |
Q for Jim Weir or others: solid state fuel level probes? | Charlie England | Home Built | 11 | March 12th 04 12:35 AM |
Heads up: threat level going to orange | richard riley | Home Built | 6 | December 23rd 03 10:49 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |