![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:56:40 GMT, Dave Hyde wrote:
My hypothesis is that the sloppy spring links let you get a bunch of rudder deflection before you get much tailwheel deflection, and this is good at, say, 40MPH and above. This is interesting. One of the things my inspector asked me to fix was the slop in the tailwheel springs. I got almost all of it out, and the airplane handles very well on the ground, but I haven't had it up to 40 mph yet. I've flown two RV's with loose springs and I thought mine handled better at low speed, but that may just be wishful thinking. I've seen lots of recommendations from RV people to make sure there's at least a little slack in the springs, and I don't recall ever seeing any RV-flyer recommend NO slack. My head hurts :-) Dave 'still ground-bound' Hyde ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Your setup is fine... for NO wind or wind STRAIGHT down the runway. In a crosswind with CONTROLS CROSSED and you're about to 3 point... guess what you got? Yep... a rudder AND a tailwheel aimed towards the boondocks. The stronger the crosswind, the more problematic this can become. depending on a lot of factors.... including one's experience level. The following is my GENERAL statement: YMMV. For the most pleasant transition.... The aircraft needs springs that can yield sufficiently in a timely manner, some 'slack' to ameliorate this golly-woppled condition or a combination of both. A lot of the setup depends on pilot preferences. Can one do without the above suggestions? Sure. Beat your head against the wall, too. That's my 2 cents - given many, many tailwheel years and hours and I'm sticking to it. g P.S. Let me add... it's as much 'art' as science. Barnyard BOb - no advocate of wheel landings |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think all this toein/toeout stuff comes into play before the tailwheel is
even down.-- walt evans NX140DL "Stealth Pilot" wrote in message ... I should add that in the considerations regarding handling of a taildragger tyre pressure and tailwheel alignment and gearing are quite critical as well. 25psi on my tailwind has as much bearing as anything regarding handling. below 25psi and it is directionally interesting, much above 25psi and it is a bugger to land but very easy to bounce, and bounce, and bounce. having the neutral point of the rudder and tailwheel together is critical. if they are offset from each other you get this very squirrelly roll out as one has effect, then the other, then the other until you finally run out of rudder. the gearing of the tailwheel is important to relaxed landing as well. having the tailwheel overgeared makes the landing a nightmare. I tamed mine by moving the link arm in to about half the prior distance where it attaches to the rudder. these are all items just as important as toe in/out when considering taildragger gear. Stealth Pilot btw how anyone lands a taildragger with sloppy spring links to the tailwheel is beyond me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:37:52 -0500, "w b evans"
wrote: I think all this toein/toeout stuff comes into play before the tailwheel is even down.-- walt evans NX140DL comes into play at any time you get the aircraft off line and are recovering to straight. regardless of where the tailwheel is. if you keep it dead straight it is all insignificant. Stealth Pilot |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:07:59 -0800, Joa wrote:
OK, I've researched this a fair bit and am still hearing two definite different views. One one hand you have those that swear you need toe-out and then on the other you have (among others- these are the few I'm certain about) Cessna 100 series, Huskies, and Pitt's that all are set with slight toe-in by the factory. Granted these are set without weight on the aircraft and the toe-in may change slightly when under load. I think it boils down to what wins when you start to go into a turn with a taildragger- does the toed-in outside wheel "drag" and thus want to straighten you back out or does the toed-out outside wheel get weight transferred to it and tend to straighten you out (vs tightening the turn)? Anybody with some definite answers based on physics? There's lots of emperical and experiential opinions out there, anybody with some more factual answers to the argument? J oa Toe in vs Toe out depends on the type of gear you have your wheels connected to. This is the absolute first thing to consider before even thinking about setting toe. If your gear is articulated you need neutral or toe-in. Why? Because the gear legs will be forced apart with toe out and the plane will start to sink on its gear. And it will happen as you push it out of the hanger. It takes very little to get the gear legs to spread if there is toe out. The rate at which it will sink depends on the amount of toe out. So if you have bungees or springs on some sort of A arm gear legs please don't use any toe-out. If you have fixed gear like a one piece steel or aluminum unit then you can consider all these other posts about how it should be set. Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:21:21 GMT, Mr Nobody
wrote: J oa Toe in vs Toe out depends on the type of gear you have your wheels connected to. This is the absolute first thing to consider before even thinking about setting toe. If your gear is articulated you need neutral or toe-in. Why? Because the gear legs will be forced apart with toe out and the plane will start to sink on its gear. And it will happen as you push it out of the hanger. It takes very little to get the gear legs to spread if there is toe out. The rate at which it will sink depends on the amount of toe out. So if you have bungees or springs on some sort of A arm gear legs please don't use any toe-out. I'll take issue here. Your plane is so light the wheels will "scuff" long before they squat the suspension enough to affect anything. Particularly when talking only a few degrees of toe-out. Now, if you were putting thousands of miles on the plane on the ground tire wear would possibly become an issue, but you FLY the thing. If you have fixed gear like a one piece steel or aluminum unit then you can consider all these other posts about how it should be set. Mike |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One other thing to consider (and I can't help but wonder if it makes a greater
difference than initial toe in or out setting) is the angle (camber) of the tire as it sits on the ground. The camber obviously changes with the weight on the gear at any time. The problem is the bias ply tires that are on light aircraft. They normally tend to want to steer toward the way they are leaning as slight as that may be. Inflation could also effect this tendency. Jim |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|