A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Discus 2a vs Arcus @ 200km/h - EGC 2013



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old July 24th 13, 11:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
jfitch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,134
Default Discus 2a vs Arcus @ 200km/h - EGC 2013

On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 7:40:07 AM UTC-7, GC wrote:
On 24/07/2013 23:10, brayera wrote:



This video presents final glide of his Discus 2a wing to wing with




Arcus flying at 200km/h. As you can see at this speed performance




of 20m span glider is no better than 15m Discus 2a.






course not. the drag penalty for the extra span kills you at high


speeds. when they slow down the arcus will walk away.




When they slow down a Libelle would walk away from both of them. But

that's evading the issue. 200ks (108 kts) is hardly high speed in a

modern glider. When DOES the Arcus earn its keep?



GC


Increasing wing span is the solution to induced drag. At high speeds, Cl is low therefore Ci is low therefore wingspan is no longer the solution. We are not breaking new ground here, this is 100 year old information. However against the Libelle, my money is on the Arcus at any speed.
  #3  
Old July 25th 13, 02:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
waremark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 377
Default Discus 2a vs Arcus @ 200km/h - EGC 2013

"When DOES the Arcus earn its keep? "

In a difficult early stage of my task this afternoon with weak climbs, I was embarassed that in my Arcus M (at 750kg) I was struggling to keep up with a less experienced if very promising pilot in a Cirrus. Later in the day, the Cirrus landed in a field and I completed my task satisfactorily.

The Arcus handles like a modern 18m glider, and performs more or less like one except in very strong or very weak conditions. It is also the best handling two seater (I hope I won't become jealous when the ASG32 and Twin Shark are available in the market). Nobody would suggest buying any of these gliders if you did not want a two seater.

Is it good value? Well, you could have just as much 2 seat fun in a K7. When asked about the cost of gliding, I always say that you can have as much fun in a glider you buy for $10k as in a $400k supership, and that people spend as much on their gliders as they want to. I enjoy the feeling that I have the best of its particular type and I guess that's why I spent the money..

Mark Burton, flying an Arcus M and an ASH 26E from London Gliding Club, UK.

On Friday, 19 July 2013 10:47:45 UTC+1, Wolf Aviator wrote:
Hi ladies and gents,



Here is a video made by Sebastian Kawa on ECG 2013 at Ostrów in

Poland.



This video presents final glide of his Discus 2a wing to wing with

Arcus flying at 200km/h. As you can see at this speed performance

of 20m span glider is no better than 15m Discus 2a.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xrDLQ61474



quote (1m 8s of video):

"A why they're buying such expensive gliders...".

Regards

Wolf

http://youtube.com/user/WolfTheAviator


  #4  
Old July 25th 13, 02:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default Discus 2a vs Arcus @ 200km/h - EGC 2013

"my Arcus M (at 750kg)"

I saw an Arcus being positioned on a grid. It took way to many people to move it. The second day when the owner looked for help every one looked the other way . The darn thing is just heavy.
  #5  
Old July 25th 13, 08:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
waremark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 377
Default Discus 2a vs Arcus @ 200km/h - EGC 2013

It's a 2 seater. It should not need more than 2 to push it. And it does not need much pushing. Tow out, taxi to the front of the grid when ready to go. Having said that, it did not like the soft ground at my club's grass airfield during the winter.
  #6  
Old July 25th 13, 07:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 374
Default Discus 2a vs Arcus @ 200km/h - EGC 2013

On Friday, July 19, 2013 10:47:45 AM UTC+1, Wolf Aviator wrote:
Hi ladies and gents,



Here is a video made by Sebastian Kawa on ECG 2013 at Ostrów in

Poland.



This video presents final glide of his Discus 2a wing to wing with

Arcus flying at 200km/h. As you can see at this speed performance

of 20m span glider is no better than 15m Discus 2a.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xrDLQ61474



quote (1m 8s of video):

"A why they're buying such expensive gliders...".

Regards

Wolf

http://youtube.com/user/WolfTheAviator


The video - its contest day 7 at the EGC Ostrow, 17/7/2013, Sebastian Kawa and Belgian Arcus 2AS both finish at 16:21:11. Sebastian wins the Standard class day (and the comp) and during a relaxing final glide at 200kph in close formation with the Arcus he fills his time by hand filming the other glider. Cool!

John Galloway
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discus 2a vs Arcus @ 200km/h Wolf Aviator Soaring 1 July 19th 13 04:31 PM
FS: Arcus T [email protected] Soaring 0 February 22nd 13 10:50 PM
Arcus - first impressions Andreas Maurer Soaring 1 July 7th 09 01:35 PM
Discus CS and Duo Discus Wing Inspections Nolaminar Soaring 0 October 24th 03 01:15 AM
[LBA] Schempp-Hirth - Discus bT - Discus Frederic FUCHS Soaring 0 September 17th 03 08:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.