![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Stickney" wrote in message ... The squared-off currugated ones are Ju 52s. The more rounded one on the left is a Ju 88. Now this is interesting: I'm finding pictures on the web of Ju 88s with different tail designs. At http://www.ju88.net they are rebuilding one and http://www.ju88.net/comparisonbilder/tailplanedraw.jpg clearly shows the vertical separation between the vertical stabilizer & rudder. While http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/types/ge...8/Ju_88_nf.htm has this picture http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/types/ge.../junkers-2.jpg about a third of the way down showing the style of rudder you see in the picture that started this thread. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "John Keeney" wrote in message ... Ju 58's were transports and used every where by the WWII Germans: they filled the same roles as the American C-47, just not as well. Funny I thought the aircraft that filled that role was the Ju-52 Crap. All right, replace every time I've type Ju 58 over the last couple of days with Ju 52. Heck, I said right up front that WWII German planes weren't my strong suit. I wonder where I got Ju 58? I googled up "German trimotor" before I posted... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ju 58's were transports and used every where by the WWII Germans:
they filled the same roles as the American C-47, just not as well. I think you mean Ju 52 or to be even more accurate Ju 52-3m. For Junkers model 52 trimotor since the first Ju 52s were single engine. I wonder if there was ever a Ju 52 2m? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Apr 2004 12:21:51 GMT, (JDupre5762) wrote:
Ju 58's were transports and used every where by the WWII Germans: they filled the same roles as the American C-47, just not as well. I think you mean Ju 52 or to be even more accurate Ju 52-3m. For Junkers model 52 trimotor since the first Ju 52s were single engine. I wonder if there was ever a Ju 52 2m? No, they just added two engines on the wings to turn the original single-engined Ju 52 into the 3m. AFAIK, there neber was a two-engined Ju 52. -- __________ ____---____ Marco Antonio Checa Funcke \_________D /-/---_----' Santiago de Surco, Lima, Peru _H__/_/ http://machf.tripod.com '-_____|( remove the "no_me_j." and "sons.of." parts before replying |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Keeney" wrote in message ... "Ryan" wrote in message ... While going through my grandfather's war photo album, I came across a photo of some German aircraft wreckage. Only the tail sections are visible, and despite my efforts, I can't identify them. http://www.geocities.com/newsgrouppictures/ The biggest part of them appear to be JU 58's: all that corrugated sheet metal is a big tip off. I think what may be confusing you is that the rudders are missing from nearly all the vertical stabilizers; the one exception near the center of the frame shows the over-all shape you're looking for. Possibly 52s instead of 58s. The left most tail section is something else. The tail's different (the rudder appears to be that old style that extends a top portion forward of the hinge line), not corrugated, comparable in size to the Ju58, kind of slab sided, horizontal tail plane mounted high on the fuselage; probably another transport or large bomber. But I haven't a clue which one. He 177 with the rear turret mashed-up perhaps? Certainly of a similar size tail section to those 52s, with the same shape vertical stabiliser as shown in the picture, but I guess that's hardly uncommon. There just isn't enough of that large piece to the far right for me to guess about what part of a plane it might be. German planes aren't my strong point. I would be fascinated to know what planes these are and any information about when and where they were used. Ju 58's were transports and used every where by the WWII Germans: they filled the same roles as the American C-47, just not as well. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 15:23:37 GMT, Ryan wrote:
While going through my grandfather's war photo album, I came across a photo of some German aircraft wreckage. Only the tail sections are visible, and despite my efforts, I can't identify them. http://www.geocities.com/newsgrouppictures/ I would be fascinated to know what planes these are and any information about when and where they were used. -Ryan I believe that they are probably JU-52/3m. The corrugated skin and the vertical fins are clues. Al Minyard |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
FA: WWII B-3jacket, B-1 pants, Class A uniform | N329DF | Military Aviation | 1 | August 16th 03 03:41 PM |
Vitre d'avion de la WWII ? WWII planes panes ? | Dessocea | Military Aviation | 0 | August 15th 03 07:07 PM |
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt" WWII Double Feature at Zeno'sDrive-In | Zeno | Aerobatics | 0 | August 2nd 03 07:31 PM |
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt": An Awesome WWII DoubleFeature at Zeno's Drive-In | zeno | Military Aviation | 0 | July 14th 03 07:31 PM |