A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Using ship fuel as aviation fuel?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 20th 04, 12:22 PM
David McArthur
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Thomas Schoene" wrote in message thlink.net...
R. David Steele wrote:
On 14 Apr 2004 22:44:09 -0700, (KDR)
wrote:

If necessary, is it possible to use F-76 as aviation fuel? I've read
somewhere that the RN's Invincible class carrier can trade off her
endurance for embarked air group's endurance by using ship fuel tanks
as 'swing tanks'. Can anyone confirm this one way or the other?

Thanks in advance


Do a little research.


I suggest the same for you, especialy before you dismiss a reasonable
question from a regualr, and usually well-informed, poster.

1) Ship power plants are not "jet engines" -- they are marine gas turbines.
Sometimes these are derived from aircraft jet engines, but they are not the
same. Terminology matters.

2) Marine gas turbines can burn fuels, like F76 diesel, that are not
considered suitable for aircraft engines. They can also burn jet fuel, but
the reverse is not true. A jet aircraft probably cannot burn F76, at least
not for very long. So I'd agree with several earlier posts that this
"swing" tankage would be jet fuel diverted to ship propulsion if need be,
rather than F76 diverted to aircraft use.

Most modern destroyers and cruisers are
powered by jet engines. The Ticonderoga ( CG-47) class and
the Spruance class (DD-963) plus new DD-X series (DD-21) are jet
powered (four engines to two shafts). The Perry class frigate
had two engines.


They have not announced how many engines DD(X) will use, but they have said
that it will probably be Rolls Royce MT-30s, not the GE LM2500s used in
other USN ships. DD(X)'s arrangements may be substantially different from
the other ships, since all-electric propulsion means that none of the
engines will be coupled directly to a propellor shaft.


Originally they were the same engines as used
by the L1011 (2500).


Nope. The L-1011 used the Rolls Royce RB211. I don't know if this has a
direct marine derivative.


I suppose the MT30/Trent could be regarded as the great-great great
grand-daughter of the RB211-22B on the Tristar

David


The GE LM2500 is derived from the TF39 (military) and CF6 (commercial) engin
es. These are used in the C-5 as well as the DC-10 and many other
airliners, but not the L-1011.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 03:26 PM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 May 11th 04 11:43 PM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aviation Marketplace 0 May 11th 04 11:43 PM
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! Jay Honeck Home Built 18 January 20th 04 05:02 PM
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals Mergatroide Aviation Marketplace 1 January 13th 04 09:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.