![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Thomas Schoene" wrote in message thlink.net...
R. David Steele wrote: On 14 Apr 2004 22:44:09 -0700, (KDR) wrote: If necessary, is it possible to use F-76 as aviation fuel? I've read somewhere that the RN's Invincible class carrier can trade off her endurance for embarked air group's endurance by using ship fuel tanks as 'swing tanks'. Can anyone confirm this one way or the other? Thanks in advance Do a little research. I suggest the same for you, especialy before you dismiss a reasonable question from a regualr, and usually well-informed, poster. 1) Ship power plants are not "jet engines" -- they are marine gas turbines. Sometimes these are derived from aircraft jet engines, but they are not the same. Terminology matters. 2) Marine gas turbines can burn fuels, like F76 diesel, that are not considered suitable for aircraft engines. They can also burn jet fuel, but the reverse is not true. A jet aircraft probably cannot burn F76, at least not for very long. So I'd agree with several earlier posts that this "swing" tankage would be jet fuel diverted to ship propulsion if need be, rather than F76 diverted to aircraft use. Most modern destroyers and cruisers are powered by jet engines. The Ticonderoga ( CG-47) class and the Spruance class (DD-963) plus new DD-X series (DD-21) are jet powered (four engines to two shafts). The Perry class frigate had two engines. They have not announced how many engines DD(X) will use, but they have said that it will probably be Rolls Royce MT-30s, not the GE LM2500s used in other USN ships. DD(X)'s arrangements may be substantially different from the other ships, since all-electric propulsion means that none of the engines will be coupled directly to a propellor shaft. Originally they were the same engines as used by the L1011 (2500). Nope. The L-1011 used the Rolls Royce RB211. I don't know if this has a direct marine derivative. I suppose the MT30/Trent could be regarded as the great-great great grand-daughter of the RB211-22B on the Tristar David The GE LM2500 is derived from the TF39 (military) and CF6 (commercial) engin es. These are used in the C-5 as well as the DC-10 and many other airliners, but not the L-1011. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 11:43 PM |
| General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 11th 04 11:43 PM |
| Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 18 | January 20th 04 05:02 PM |
| Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 13th 04 09:26 PM |